A painting of La Beastia, the train that carries Central American migrants across Mexico, by artist Diego Rodarte
An art exhibition focusing on the train that carries up to half a million Central American migrants across Mexico toward the United States every year opens today at UC Berkeley’s Center for Latin American Studies (CLAS).
The exhibit, by the Artist Collective Against Discrimination, is titled Riding the Beast, named for the notorious train that carries desperate Central American and Mexican migrants as it rumbles across Mexico.
CLAS is mounting the exhibit in collaboration with the Mexican Museum, the Consulate General of Mexico in San Francisco and the Mexican Agency for International Development Cooperation.
Exhibit photo by Ken Li.
Center leaders said the exhibit is intended to help promote dialogue from people from both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border at a time of intense national debate about immigration, human rights, walls and deportation.
The exhibit will be open to the public from 1-5 p.m., Tuesday through Friday, through August 10 at 2334 Bowditch St., Berkeley, CA about two blocks from the south edge of campus.
MONTARlabestia is underwritten by Richard A. Levy, MD, and Andrew Kluger, in collaboration with the Mexican Museum, the Mexican Consulate General of San Francisco, and the Mexican Agency for International Development Cooperation.
“There’s a network of freight trains that runs the length of Mexico, from its southernmost border with Guatemala north to the United States. In addition to grain, corn or scrap metal, these trains are carrying an increasing number of undocumented immigrants whose aim is to cross into the U.S.
“And despite the many deadly challenges it poses, more and more children — both with adults and alone — have been making the risky journey. That prompted President Obama this week to warn of “an urgent humanitarian situation.”
“These aren’t passenger trains; there are no panoramic windows, seats or even a roof to guard from sun or rain. People call the train La Bestia, or The Beast. Some call it the Death Train.”
As if my wrinkles aren’t enough of a giveaway, all kinds of other factors are blabbing my age to the world at large.
Winston Churchill (1874-1965) with fiancée Clementine Hozier (1885-1977) shortly before their marriage in 1908; Wikimedia Commons
One stool pigeon is America Online. Yep, that’s still my internet service provider, which apparently immediately labels me as a codger. I love my AOL! As far as I’m concerned, it still beats some of those upstart ISPs like Yahoo and Gmail. (Yes, I know. They’re not exactly cutting edge either; but comparatively speaking they’re pretty avant-garde — well, to codgers anyway.)
My choice of music is another dead giveaway. The lyrics of my favorite songs tell sweet, romantic stories. No political statements, no anti-establishment rants, and not a single obscenity. Furthermore, the singers can actually sing — no screeching., whispering, or special-effect enhancements, I can understand the lyrics, and the melodies are melodic.
My clothes are another clue. No holes in my Mom jeans, no crotch-length skirts, no ridiculously tight dresses wrinkling across the tummy or behind (which definitely doesn’t protrude, by the way — a flat rear end has always been my goal). Add to that my lack of tattoos and piercings (except for one —and only one — discreet hole in each earlobe. Then there’s my hair, It’s not purple, pink, or green; and it doesn’t stand up in spikes all over my head.
Perhaps a less-obvious harbinger of my advanced years is any Word document on my computer. If you’ll check closely, you’ll find two spaces after every period I type. I know that’s no longer a thing, but I’ve been doing it since I learned to type eons ago on a clunky Royal manual typewriter (remember typewriters?). Hitting the space bar twice at the end of a sentence is such an ingrained habit, I physically can’t not do it. OOOPS, a double negative —which reminds me of how grammar rules have changed since I was young. In fact, my inability to let go of many of these now-obsolete directives is the biggest betrayal of how long I’ve been taking up space on this planet.
For example, I was taught to never split an infinitive — so I now force myself to always do it (twice in this sentence alone!) to indisputably prove (Hey! I did it again!) that I’m not an old fogey. I am trying to accept that it’s perfectly okay to boldly go where no well-educated person had gone before. But it’s hard for me.
That’s another thing — starting a sentence with “But” or “And.” GASP!!! Is it really okay to do that now? As for sentences, we don’t even need to use complete ones anymore. Like this one. Very confusing (yes, that one too). That’s still so foreign to me that I often resort to using dashes to make the fragmented phrase part of the preceding sentence, rather than send it to the page to stand alone (as I did in the first sentence of this paragraph).
And if you’re as old as I am you’ll remember Winston Churchill’s proclamation that trying not to end a sentence with a preposition was “the sort of bloody nonsense up with which I will not put.”
After all, what are rules for? To be broken sometimes. (Did you notice that I ended the first sentence in this paragraph with a preposition and followed that with another incomplete sentence? I’m on a roll! Drunk with power!)
And what’s with the rule that all forms of the verb “to be” take a subjective, rather than objective, pronoun. If someone asks you on the phone, “Who is this?” Do you respond “It’s me” or “It’s I”? The former, though grammatically incorrect, certainly sounds less awkward than the latter — which you would use if you wanted to let your interrogator know that you went to college.
But none of this matters. Try though I might to look and sound hep (OMG, I’m sure that word has been obsolete for decades), one of my accessories gives me away. No, I no longer wear a fanny pack (though it sure was handy); but I’m afraid there’s one thing I can’t give up that broadcasts my age to all — my cane! It’s gold. And it’s glitzy. And it’s pretty. And I hate it.
Is a walker next?
Hopefully, I’ll be wearing wings before that happens; and they will be all the support I need!
“In a state like New Mexico, with more than 20 American Indian tribes, vast tracts of public lands, federal water projects, myriad endangered species issues, large-scale oil and gas development and existing and proposed mines on public lands, the staffing changes — and what they signal— could have deep and long-lasting effects on the state’s landscapes, communities and future.”
Zinke Signs Secretarial Order To Streamline Process For Federal Onshore Oil And Gas Leasing Permits
US Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke today signed a secretarial order to tackle permitting backlogs and delays, identify solutions to improve the permitting process on federal lands, and to identify solutions to improve access to additional parcels of federal land that are appropriate for mineral development. As of January 31, 2017, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) had 2,802 Applications for Permit to Drill (APD) pending.
Despite the fact that statute requires that the Department and the BLM process APD review within 30 days, the average time to process an APD in FY16 was 257 days. The directive will improve the Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Program and the Federal Solid Mineral Leasing Program, which is a major source of income for the federal government and a critical component of American Energy Dominance.
“Oil and gas production on federal lands is an important source of revenue and job growth in rural America but it is hard to envision increased investment on federal lands when a federal permit can take the better part of a year or more in some cases. This is why I’m directing the BLM to conduct quarterly lease sales and address these permitting issues. We are also looking at opportunities to bring support to our front line offices who are facing the brunt of this workload.” said Secretary Zinke. “This is just good government and will further support the President’s goal of American energy dominance.”
As of January 31, 2017, the BLM had 2,802 APDs pending. The five BLM field offices with the highest number of pending APDs are listed below which account for 2,060 or approximately 74 percent of the total pending APDs.
Casper, Wyoming: APDs pending: 526
Vernal, Utah: APDs pending: 506
Dickinson, North Dakota: APDs pending: 488
Carlsbad/Hobbs, New Mexico: APDs pending: 388
Farmington, New Mexico: APDs pending: 152
Last year the Department canceled or postponed eleven lease sales. By contrast, the Trump Administration has already held more lease sales in the first six months than in the previous year, offered more acreage in those sales, and raised more revenue than in the same time period last year.
“The Department of the Interior will be a better neighbor in the new Trump Administration,” Zinke added. “As is outlined in this order, we will look at ways to improve the process and make sure regulations serve their intended purpose rather than create a mountain of useless paperwork. By streamlining approvals of responsible energy development on federal land, and actually holding lease sales, we will generate revenue for local communities and the Treasury to fund the things we all value like National Parks, infrastructure and education.”
The order also directs the BLM to address permitting backlogs and identify areas where improvements can be made in the permitting process to ensure the safe and timely exploration and development of our nation’s federal energy resources.
Currently, an applicant pays a non-refundable $9,610 processing fee to the BLM per APD filed. Approved APDs are valid for two years from the date of approval as long as the lease does not expire during that time. For FY18, the President’s budget proposal includes a $16 million increase in the Oil and Gas Management program to support permitting and rights-of-way processing.
Ciera Smith, 22, arrived at Rural Women’s Recovery Program on April 5. Smith said she misused gabapentin to give her energy and keep up with her 2-year-old daughter. (Carmen Heredia Rodriguez/KHN)
On April 5, Ciera Smith sat in a car parked on the gravel driveway of the Rural Women’s Recovery Program here with a choice to make: go to jail or enter treatment for her addiction.
Smith, 22, started abusing drugs when she was 18, enticed by the “good time” she and her friends found in smoking marijuana. She later turned to addictive painkillers, then anti-anxiety medications such as Xanax and eventually Suboxone, a narcotic often used to replace opioids when treating addiction.
Before stepping out of the car, she decided she needed one more high before treatment. She reached into her purse and then swallowed a handful of gabapentin pills.
Last December, Ohio’s Board of Pharmacy began reporting sales of gabapentin prescriptions in its regular monitoring of controlled substances. The drug, which is not an opioid nor designated a controlled substance by federal authorities, is used to treat nerve pain. But the board found that it was the most prescribed medication on its list that month, surpassing oxycodone by more than 9 million doses. In February, the Ohio Substance Abuse Monitoring Network issued an alert regarding increasing misuse across the state.
And it’s not just in Ohio. Gabapentin’s ability to tackle multiple ailments has helped make it one of the most popular medications in the US. In May, it was the fifth-most prescribed drug in the nation, according to GoodRx.
Gabapentin is approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat epilepsy and pain related to nerve damage, called neuropathy. Also known by its brand name, Neurontin, the drug acts as a sedative. It is widely considered non-addictive and touted by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as an alternative intervention to opiates for chronic pain. Generally, doctors prescribe no more than 1,800 to 2,400 milligrams of gabapentin per day, according to information on the Mayo Clinic’s website.
Gabapentin does not carry the same risk of lethal overdoses as opioids, but drug experts say the effects of using gabapentin for long periods of time or in very high quantities, particularly among sensitive populations like pregnant women, are not well-known.
S. 1456—Sen. Luther Strange (R-AL)/Judiciary (6/28/17)—A bill to provide that human life shall be deemed to begin with fertilization.
Child Protection
H.R. 3147—Rep. Kristi Noem (R-SD)/Judiciary (6/29/17)—A bill to amend the PROTECT Act to make Indian tribes eligible for AMBER Alert grants.
Rep. Kristi Noem, C-Span 2 video, questioning testimony, House Ways and Means Committee
Education
H.R. 3119—Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH)/Education and the Workforce (6/29/17)—A bill to provide grants to local educational agencies to encourage girls and underrepresented minorities to pursue studies and careers in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology.
H.R. 3137—Rep. Daniel Kildee (D-MI)/Education and the Workforce (6/29/17)—A bill to increase participation of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematic occupations.
Family Support
S. 1427—Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA)/Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (6/26/17)—A bill to provide states with the option of applying for and receiving temporary waivers for states to experiment with new approached that integrate federal programs in order to provide more coordinated and holistic solutions to families in need, and for other purposes.
H.R. 3151—Rep. Bruce Poliquin (R-ME)/Agriculture (6/29/17)—A bill to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Health
S. 1497—Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT)/Environment and Public Works (6/29/17)— A bill to provide a lactation room in public buildings, and for other purposes.
S. Res. 428—Rep. Tim Murphy (R-PA)/Energy and Commerce (6/29/17)—A resolution expressing support for the designation of “National Eating Disorders Awareness Week” and supporting the goals and ideals to raise awareness and understanding of eating disorders.
Human Trafficking
S. 1517—Sen. Dean Heller (R-NV)/Judiciary (6/29/17)—A bill to enhance the Human Exploitation Rescue Operations Act of 2015, and for other purposes.
S. 1504—Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)/Judiciary (6/29/17)—A bill to direct the attorney general to study issues relating to human trafficking, and for other purposes.
International
S. Res. 421—Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ)/Foreign Affairs (6/28/17)—A resolution urging the administration to develop more effective and timely responses to famine in Africa, especially efforts to end the conflicts in South Sudan, Nigeria, and other countries that cause or exacerbate famine.
Military
S. 1434—Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)/Armed Services (6/26/17)—A bill to enhance the military childcare programs and activities of the Department of Defense, and for other purposes.
S. 1506—Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)/Commerce, Science, and Transportation (6/29/17)—A bill to improve the handling of instances of sexual harassment, dating violence, domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking at the United States Merchant Marine Academy, and for other purposes.
H.R. 3157—Rep. Thomas Suozzi (D-NY)/Armed Services; Education and the Workforce; Transportation and Infrastructure (6/29/17)—A bill to improve the handling of instances of sexual harassment, dating violence, domestic violence, and stalking at the United States Merchant Marine Academy, and for other purposes.
Miscellaneous
S. 1498—Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME)/Rules and Administration (6/29/17)—A bill to establish in the Smithsonian Institution a comprehensive American women’s history museum, and for other purposes.
Research and text from Women’s Congressional Policy Institute; Congress is in recess until the week of July 10.
Three Flags, 1958, Jasper Johns, Encaustic on canvas; Whitney Museum of Art
APRIL 12, 2017
Q&A with David McCullough
David McCullough talked about his book, The American Spirit: Who We Are and What We Stand For, a selection of his speeches going back to 1989.
Brian Lamb
David McCullough, your new book “The American Spirit,” fifteen speeches since 1989 through 2016, when did you get the idea to do this?
David McCullough
Last summer, summer of 2016, and I just was not discouraged but distressed by the tone of the political campaign and the animosity and the nastiness of some of it.
David McCullough
And I thought, I’ve got to do something, maybe, that I – to help to bring some balance back and remind people of who we are and how we got to be where we are and what we stand for.
David McCullough
And I thought you’ve been speaking up and down the land for 40 years or more, maybe there’s some of those speeches, that if we dusted them off and put them together, not as a – an anthology but speeches, where I addressed ideas or – or subjects that pertain to reminding us about who we are and what our values had down the years.
David McCullough
And my daughter Dorie Lawson, who has been arranging all my speaking dates all these years, wanted very much to help with it and she had whatever records we had of what I said, as many of the speeches, there was no record of what I said but we had enough that there were manuscripts of it.
David McCullough
I’ve never wanted to give a commencement speech or a speech some – celebrating some important national event or anniversary that I didn’t put it on paper; I didn’t want to just wing it.
David McCullough
I love to speak and I – I’ve been able to speak often my whole working life. And I – I’ve been able to speak without notes, and it took a while to learn how to do that but I did.
David McCullough
But even though I can do that, I felt in many, many instances that I must commitment my thoughts to paper and work on it. And some of these speeches I – I would work on it for a week or more to get it to where – what I really wanted to say, and particularly if I felt it was an occasion of – of importance to our country.
David McCullough
And there are four of those speeches in the group, and – and reading them again after many years, I thought they hold up. Now, there were some that didn’t hold up and I didn’t include those.
David McCullough
There was some that were too first person singular and I didn’t include those. And my dedication in the book is to my grandchildren.
Brian Lamb
19.
David McCullough
19 of them, yes, that’s right. And so, I’m reaching out to that generation with the hope that they might draw some guidance or inspiration or motivation from what the old boy said in the days past.
David McCullough
My publisher – I didn’t know they would react to the idea, and they were enthusiastic from the beginning and thank – thank goodness. And they’ve done, I think, a beautiful job of publishing it with the photographs and the archival material that they reproduced.
Brian Lamb
But we – in the meantime, are you writing another book?
David McCullough
I am and the subject of the book is – is touched on in one of these speeches, the speech I gave at Ohio University in Athens.
David McCullough
I’m writing – I got very involved in the history of Ohio when I was writing my book about the Wright brothers and really fascinating aspect of the American story when you think of who came from Ohio and how relatively vast Ohio produces so many remarkable people.
David McCullough
More – more of our presidents have come any other state, Thomas Edison, the Wright brothers, and if you include the Northwest Territory, which is what much of the book is about, you have Abraham Lincoln, you have – it goes on and on.
David McCullough
The Northwest Territory was the subject I knew nothing about and very briefly, quickly, the Northwest Territory was ceded to us, to our country, by the British at the end of the Revolutionary War in the Treaty of Paris, 1783.
David McCullough
And it was a brilliant stroke of genius on the part of John Adams and others who were the diplomats on that occasion, because what they ceded to us equaled in size the entire area of the original 13 colonies.
David McCullough
In other words, we doubled the size of our country geographically, physically, with one stroke of the pen and there was nobody, except the natives – Native Americans, nobody living there, no settlements, no towns, nothing.
David McCullough
And there was sort of squatters and – and traders, fur dealers and trappers and so forth, but no – no settlement and the idea that was cooked up by this fellow Manasseh Cutler, and others from up around Boston, was to create a way of paying back to the veterans of the Revolution who never received any money for their service.
David McCullough
They received certificates but by the time the war was over, all of that was virtually worthless, about 10 cents of the dollar. So, this would be a way to provide the sale of land, primarily farmland would be – mainly farmland, to these veterans at about 8 cents an acre.
David McCullough
So – and as most people don’t know, and I didn’t know, there was very severe depression following the Revolution, as bad, proportionately, as was the Great Depression of the 1930s. So, every – everything was way down and it was hard as can be to get by and make a living.
David McCullough
And the man who put that bill through the Continental Congress, summer of 1787, the same – just before the Constitution, before we had a Constitution (so nobody) had no presidents yet, was this man Manasseh Cutler who was a minister and a doctor – physician and a lawyer and a brilliant botanist, astronomer.
David McCullough
He was an 18th century polymath at the ultimate peak, very much like Benjamin Franklin and he was often compared to Benjamin Franklin in that respect.
David McCullough
And he sold the Congress on the idea of creating this territory to comprise five states and in those five states – this is what’s so exciting about it, there would be complete freedom of religion, totally free from religion, there would government support, public support for education all the way through college, hence state universities came to be, and, and there’d be no slavery.
David McCullough
Now, there were slaves in all 13 colonies in the summer of 1787, but they passed this ordinance, as it was called, the Northwest Ordinance, so there’d be no slaves in half of the geographic reach of our country, but it also meant, of course, Brian, that the Ohio River – Northwest meant Northwest of the Ohio River.
David McCullough
The Ohio River now, if you could get across it and you were a slave, you were free. So, that’s where the whole advent or birth of the Underground Railroad came about. It was one of the most important decisions Congress every made.
David McCullough
And this one guy pulled it off and I thought to myself, “woah, who is he? Who was he?” and I got to know him and once I got into his life and what happened consequently, I thought “this is a great book, great subject.”
David McCullough
So, that’s what I’m working on, but it all began when I was invited to come to Ohio University to give the commencement speech the year they were celebrating the creation of the university in the central building in the university campus.
David McCullough
The oldest building is Cutler Hall, named for Manasseh Cutler. And we don’t sufficiently appreciate, I don’t think, how much education mattered to the founders and how much emphasis they put on education as being essential to whether the whole idea of democracy was going to work.
David McCullough
But Jefferson said any nation that expects to be ignorant and free expects what never was and never can be. Now that idea of the importance of education I think is extremely pertinent, relevant, and important today, if ever was. And I think that one of the things that we Americans don’t sufficiently appreciate is — a lot that we have a lot that we’ve achieved that we don’t sufficiently appreciate — but one of them is our college and university system.
David McCullough
Yes they’ve gotten very expensive, too expensive. And yes some of them have gotten too politically correct or incorrect or whatever. But we have created the greatest universities and colleges in the world. And we have more of them than any country in the world. And now the percentage of who gets to go to college it keeps rising steadily. I don’t know about how it was with you, my father didn’t go to college.
David McCullough
He graduated from high school and that was thought to be pretty darn good. And that aspect of trying to reach greater understanding through learning in order to perfect society, to improve the problems that need to be solved, and so forth, is one of the major lessons of our story as a people.
Brian Lamb
You point out in a book that the Northwest Ordinance creates basically Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
David McCullough
Yes.
Brian Lamb
This speech was given at Ohio University in 2004.
David McCullough
Yes.
Brian Lamb
Why were you going to Ohio? Why did you agree to go there?
David McCullough
They invited me to come and give a speech of the year of their bicentennial.
Brian Lamb
So do you remember when you went through the process how did you — how long did you take to get ready for this speech?
David McCullough
Well I had been spending about four years in Ohio working on the Wright brothers’ book. I was not living there but going back and forth. And I got very interested in its history and met a lot of people that I thought were extremely interesting. Both people, you know, from the past and present day people.
David McCullough
And so when I was invited to give the commencement speech in this fascinating state whether — it was the first university west of the Allegheny Mountains. I thought, I’d love to, so I just did the digging, did the homework, and came up — ran into this guy Cutler. And
Brian Lamb
Manasseh
David McCullough
Manasseh Cutler.
Brian Lamb
Who also went to your school, Yale.
David McCullough
Yes, and I found out he went to Yale. And then I found out that for three years he lived on Martha’s Vineyard running a store there in Edgartown and had two of his sons were born there on the vineyard not very far from our house. And that of course — oh and to get to Ohio you have to through Pittsburgh which is my hometown so it was — it was in the cards. It was in the stars. I had to do it.
Brian Lamb
How long is the perfect speech? In minutes?
David McCullough
In my judgment? Speeches in general?
Brian Lamb
Yes. In other words when your speaking to a graduation?
David McCullough
Oh, no more than 20 minutes.
Brian Lamb
Why?
David McCullough
Well because it — you’re part of a ceremony. And the ceremony has many elements and you don’t want to hog more space than you should. I’ve never been told how long my speech could be or how short it must be or any of that. Now if I’m invited to come to a university to address a general audience then it’s expected that you’re talk will run about 45 minutes.
Brian Lamb
Let’s look at a speech that was given back in 1989 that kicks off this book. This is only about 30 seconds and you gave this speech in the House of Representatives.
David McCullough
Yes. No, joint session.
Brian Lamb
Joint session?
David McCullough
Yes, in the House.
Brian Lamb
And how often does that happen to a historian in history?
David McCullough
Well, someone who is not in the congress is very rarely ever invited to address a joint session. If it is it’s somebody like the President of another country or.
Brian Lamb
The Pope.
David McCullough
Yes, or General Lafayette. So it was a very high compliment.
Brian Lamb
Well, let’s watch a little bit of it just so we get the flow.
David McCullough
Oh, I’ve never seen it.
Brian Lamb
Really?
David McCullough
No.
David McCullough
(Begin Video Clip)
David McCullough
The 20th century Senator that has been written about the most is Joe McCarthy. There are a dozen books about McCarthy yet there is no biography of the Senator who had the backbone to stand up to him first. Margaret J. Smith. I speak as a Republican she said on that memorable day in the Senate. I speak as a woman. I speak as a United States Senator. I speak as an American. I don’t want to see the Republican Party ride to political victory on the Four Horsemen of Calumny — fear, ignorance, bigotry, and smear.
David McCullough
(End Video Clip)
Brian Lamb
Do you remember how you went about preparing for that speech?
David McCullough
Oh, you know, I go about it. Hardest I’ve ever worked on anything I’ve ever delivered from a podium. And that line, just then, I just recently looked up calumny again. To make sure I know — it means untruthful, audacious, defamation of somebody else’s character.
Brian Lamb
Joe McCarthy.
David McCullough
Yes. And then there’s a wonderful line — let me just see. I can’t quote it off hand, where Truman, who — he was President, and had been President — speech was given in 19 — her speech 1954. Harry Truman later said to Senator Smith, Mrs. Smith, your declaration of conscious was one of the finest things to happen here in Washington in all my years in the Senate and in the White House.
David McCullough
President of the other party. But he saw what courage that took. And he knew a lot about courage — he — and strength of character. And he was never reluctant to praise somebody who disagreed with him or was on the other side politically if he felt that they deserved praise.
Brian Lamb
Here’s a speech August 5, 1994 at Monticello.
Brian Lamb
(Begin Video Clip)
David McCullough
The Declaration of Independence was not a creation of the Gods, but of living men. And let us never forget extremely brave men. They were staking their lives on what they believed. Pledging as Jefferson wrote in the memorable final passage of the Declaration, our lives, our fortunes, our sacred honor.
David McCullough
(End Video Clip)
Brian Lamb
How’s Jefferson doing in history?
David McCullough
Well he’s having a little trouble and he’ll have more because there’s an awful lot about his time and his nature that seems inconsistent and hypocritical. But we should never ever dismiss someone whose values counted in the long run because aspects of their way of life are no longer tolerable.
Brian Lamb
Why do you think the founding fathers came up, you know, we’re all created equal and they really didn’t seem to mean it?
David McCullough
Well, some of them meant it. John Adams never owned a slave.
Brian Lamb
But the first seven Presidents besides John Adams and John Quincy Adams all had slaves.
David McCullough
That’s right. Yes. It just doesn’t gel — it doesn’t jive. The pieces of the puzzle don’t fit. I think that what it was that the people who are appalled by slavery, who hated slavery, and there are lots of them. It wasn’t just John Adams and Abigail and their son John Quincy, lots of the people who went out to Ohio, for example, to settle that territory — they didn’t want slavery because they didn’t like slavery.
David McCullough
They thought it was evil. An evil. But I think that the original founders who were against slavery though we’ll never pull all these colonies together — which are really like, in many ways, as different one from another as foreign countries were — we’ll never get ahead with it if we don’t tolerate this for a while. But when you think that with one stroke of the pens of the members of Congress in 1787 they eliminated slavery completely in this vast territory.
David McCullough
What if they had done it for the whole deal then? Or what if the government prior to the Civil War had offered to buy the slaves? It would have been a bargain price compared to the horrific cost of that war. I’m just talking financially, let alone the lives lost.
Brian Lamb
May 30, 1998. This is a speech at the University of Massachusetts at the graduation:
Brian Lamb
(Begin audio clip): From history we learn that sooner is not necessarily better. That what we don’t know can indeed hurt us very often and badly. And there, and that there is no such thing as a self-made man or woman. We all got where we are as did everyone before us with the help of others. (End audio clip)
There’s a fashion surge for ekphrastic poetry these days. Most simply, that means poetry based on specific works of art in another form than poetry. After reading other things having to do with the effects on one’s mind of images (in whatever form) that lodge there, the whole notion of saving memories seems to have taken root in my head. *
It occurs to me that while the ‘human condition’ is in no way monolithic, there might be some divisions of sensitivities to varied experience. In a word, maybe some people are born luckier than others in their abilities to respond to what they experience. After reading W. H. Merwin’s, Old Man at Home Alone in the Morning, (an essay anyone of any age should read and enjoy) the following changes began to bother me.
Now I’m an old woman burdened with all I’ve known and now can no longer recall as I wish. So much from childhood is gone, but what isn’t keeps bubbling up through the muck of forgetfulness when I least expect it to. Some of those bubbles make me wish I’d been aware of them when I was a mother. Oh, of course, I’m still a mother because one can’t go backward, but now for me, that’s a status without much meaning since nearly all of my grandchildren are older than I was when I became a mother.
Take for instance, the preoccupation with the names of things, that was so essential to my father, and that I’ve retained, yet can’t recall whether I ever consciously tried to pass on. Even my dearest companion was somewhat afflicted with this (I hope minor) obsession. And why does it loom now so large as a matter of consequence to my bumbling consciousness? Even wrote about it for SWW (Renewing Respect for Language: The Subjunctive Is a Governor of the Consciousness That Uses It). Did I fail in a relatively simple matter of pointing out things to our children? Do any of them care half as much as we did?
In these pleasant, lonely rooms, my thoughts come out in sentences half the time, as if I were speaking aloud to a human listener. When they’re allowed, or more accurately, when they’re able to float free, they seem cloudy and dulled. I realize I’m not able to be back in the place and time that gave them rise, but am forever exiled from what made just being alive so precious.
I can recreate an occasional seminal moment if I’ve written about it at some time, (immediately giving rise to regret that keeping a journal was such sometime thing). A few of the best and worst remain vivid even without that help, but no amount of effort to fill in lost detail or to bring back anything concrete about some of the most important events makes anything fully clear again. Should I be glad of the lack?
After perhaps half my life had gone, I began to notice how only what included my husband seemed to have had anything much to do with whatever I became. Now, of course, I see the error in that, yet it’s as if I was at best, half-formed before he entered my life.
The fact that I must look at photographs to be sure I recall his face, though his body comes clearly into my mind, distresses me. I can’t remember exactly how his voice sounded, after sixty years of listening to it in every possible mood and tone. A month or so ago, another man kissed me on the lips as a gesture of a suggestion that I couldn’t accept, and suddenly, I could remember the lips of my lost love as though I had felt them yesterday.
The experience has taught me that the past is with me like the skin on my body, never to be changed. And, like that skin, can’t be peeled back to reveal anything without acute pain, even if one could figure out how to do it.
I’m exhilarated and humbled — and apprehensive. Without a doubt, I’m not unique in these contradictory feelings, yet I hope I might at least be especially blessed, like someone born with a ‘silver spoon’ in my mouth. I understand that there’s no obvious way to find out whether that’s the case, or if 99% are there with me.
Ask Siri to find a math tutor to help you ‘grasp’ calculus and she’s likely to respond that your request is beyond her abilities. That’s because metaphors like ‘grasp’ are difficult for Apple’s voice-controlled personal assistant to, well, grasp. But new UC Berkeley research suggests that Siri and other digital helpers could someday learn the algorithms that humans have used for centuries to create and understand metaphorical language.
Mapping 1,100 years of metaphoric English language, researchers at UC Berkeley and Lehigh University in Pennsylvania have detected patterns in how English speakers have added figurative word meanings to their vocabulary. The results, published in the journal Cognitive Psychology, demonstrate how throughout history humans have used language that originally described palpable experiences such as “grasping an object” to describe more intangible concepts such as “grasping an idea.”
“The use of concrete language to talk about abstract ideas may unlock mysteries about how we are able to communicate and conceptualize things we can never see or touch,” said study senior author Mahesh Srinivasan, an assistant professor of psychology at UC Berkeley. “Our results may also pave the way for future advances in artificial intelligence.”
The findings provide the first large-scale evidence that the creation of new metaphorical word meanings is systematic, researchers said. They can also inform efforts to design natural language processing systems like Siri to help them understand creativity in human language.
“Although such systems are capable of understanding many words, they are often tripped up by creative uses of words that go beyond their existing, pre-programmed vocabularies,” said study lead author Yang Xu, a postdoctoral researcher in linguistics and cognitive science at UC Berkeley.
CBO and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimate that enacting the legislation — which would repeal or modify many provisions of the Affordable Care Act — would reduce federal deficits by $321 billion over the coming decade.
CBO and JCT estimate that in 2018, 15 million more people would be uninsured under the legislation than under current law. After additional changes to subsidies for insurance purchased in the nongroup market and to the Medicaid program took effect, the increase in the number of uninsured people would rise to 19 million in 2020 and then to 22 million in 2026.
The Congressional Budget Office and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) have completed an estimate of the direct spending and revenue effects of the Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017, a Senate amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 1628. CBO and JCT estimate that enacting this legislation would reduce the cumulative federal deficit over the 2017-2026 period by $321 billion. That amount is $202 billion more than the estimated net savings for the version of H.R. 1628 that was passed by the House of Representatives.
The Senate bill would increase the number of people who are uninsured by 22 million in 2026 relative to the number under current law, slightly fewer than the increase in the number of uninsured estimated for the House-passed legislation. By 2026, an estimated 49 million people would be uninsured, compared with 28 million who would lack insurance that year under current law.
Following the overview, this document provides details about the major provisions of this legislation, the estimated costs to the federal government, the basis for the estimate, and other related information, including a comparison with CBO’s estimate for the House-passed act.
Effects on the Federal Budget
CBO and JCT estimate that, over the 2017-2026 period, enacting this legislation would reduce direct spending by $1,022 billion and reduce revenues by $701 billion, for a net reduction of $321 billion in the deficit over that period (see Table 1, at the end of this document):
The largest savings would come from reductions in outlays for Medicaid—spending on the program would decline in 2026 by 26 percent in comparison with what CBO projects under current law—and from changes to the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA’s) subsidies for nongroup health insurance (see Figure 1). Those savings would be partially offset by the effects of other changes to the ACA’s provisions dealing with insurance coverage: additional spending designed to reduce premiums and a reduction in revenues from repealing penalties on employers who do not offer insurance and on people who do not purchase insurance.
The largest increases in deficits would come from repealing or modifying tax provisions in the ACA that are not directly related to health insurance coverage, including repealing a surtax on net investment income and repealing annual fees imposed on health insurers.
Pay-as-you-go procedures apply because enacting this legislation would affect direct spending and revenues. CBO and JCT estimate that enactment would not increase net direct spending or on-budget deficits in any of the four consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2027. The agencies expect that savings, particularly from Medicaid, would continue to grow, while the costs would be smaller because a rescinded tax on employees’ health insurance premiums and health plan benefits would be reinstated in 2026. CBO has not completed an estimate of the potential impact of this legislation on discretionary spending, which would be subject to future appropriation action.
Effects on Health Insurance Coverage
CBO and JCT estimate that, in 2018, 15 million more people would be uninsured under this legislation than under current law —primarily because the penalty for not having insurance would be eliminated. The increase in the number of uninsured people relative to the number projected under current law would reach 19 million in 2020 and 22 million in 2026. In later years, other changes in the legislation—lower spending on Medicaid and substantially smaller average subsidies for coverage in the nongroup market—would also lead to increases in the number of people without health insurance. By 2026, among people under age 65, enrollment in Medicaid would fall by about 16 percent and an estimated 49 million people would be uninsured, compared with 28 million who would lack insurance that year under current law.
New roofs are coming to Africatown, a hamlet of crumbling shotgun houses amid ancient pecan trees northwest of Mobile Bay.
The replacements, many of which will go to the neighborhood’s poor and aging homeowners, are being paid for by a first-of-its-kind state grant program that aims to lower homeowners’ insurance rates and reinforce Alabama homes against future windstorms.
Alabama officials, like state and local leaders around the country, expect disaster recovery costs to continue to grow as people live in vulnerable areas and climate change increases the frequency and intensity of natural disasters. At the same time, the Federal Emergency Management Agency is considering a plan that would shift more recovery costs to the states.
In response, some states are taking steps to ensure that communities can better survive disasters, efforts they hope will lower recovery costs down the line.
Charleston, South Carolina, is spending millions to send flood water back to the ocean through underground tunnels and pumping stations. Miami has been working on flood prevention as the ocean inundates the city with greater frequency. And in the wake of Superstorm Sandy in 2012, New Jersey began taking over vulnerable properties and rebuilding coastline to better protect communities just beyond the dunes.
But homeowners, too, have to be ready for storms. A quick return of residents after a disaster can deter blight and boost local businesses.
Brian Powell, director of the Alabama grant program, hopes the improvements homeowners are making will encourage insurance companies to reduce rates and be more willing to cover coastal properties — and make rebuilding fast and economical the next time a hurricane sweeps up the Gulf of Mexico or a tornado rips through the state’s rural, northern counties.
“We figured the only way to reduce [insurance] rates was to reduce risk,” he said.
The new roofs are built using a method developed by the industry-funded Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety (IBHS). The “Fortified” standard — which can be used for a roof or an entire house — requires special nails, a specific system for layering roofing material, and more secure connections between the roof, walls, and foundation of a house. It is higher than most local building codes, even in hurricane zones.
Alabama’s embrace of Fortified has made it an unlikely leader in building and retrofitting houses to survive big storms. It not only boasts the grant program, which helps pay for new roofs in the state’s two coastal counties and eventually will reach the rest of the state, but also requires insurance companies to offer premium discounts to homeowners who have built or upgraded their homes and been certified as Fortified.
A number of jurisdictions in Alabama have adopted Fortified as their minimum standard.
‘”A lot of people say, ‘Never again,’ but they have actually taken steps to mean ‘Never again,’ ” said Julie Rochman, president of IBHS.
The program is new, but it is catching on, Rochman said. She points to at least 80 chapters of Habitat for Humanity that are building Fortified roofs and homes. Louisiana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island and South Carolina are also encouraging the construction of Fortified homes.
Some Alabama homeowners are upgrading their homes without state help. But many people in poor communities like Africatown, which is home to descendants of slaves who were illegally brought to the United States in 1860, cannot afford to replace their roofs without the grant.
The homes here, built mostly before 1965, with some dating back to the early 20th century, are not designed to withstand the storms that can roll in from the Atlantic Ocean, through the Gulf of Mexico, and up Mobile Bay, like Hurricane Ivan did in 2004.
In communities like Africatown, taking steps now to strengthen homes could mean the difference between being able to recover and getting wiped off the map. (more…)