Blog

  • Reliable Sources of Information Regarding Hurricane Irma: National Weather Service, National Hurricane Service, Florida Health, FEMA, US Army Corps of Engineers

    Editor’s Note: Other services are:  http://www.floridadisaster.org/index.asp (Florida Disaster has a section on Florida Shelters), National Hurricane Center (http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/)  


     
     
    National Weather ServiceUnited States Department of Commerce
     
     
     

    DANGEROUS HURRICANE IRMA HEADING FOR SOUTH FLORIDA

    **HURRICANE WARNING AND STORM SURGE WARNING NOW IN EFFECT** Take action now to protect against destructive winds, dangerous storm surge, and flooding rains. —— **Aviso de Huracán y Aviso de Marejada Ciclónica ahora en Efecto** Tome acción ahora para protegerse de los vientos destructivos, marejada ciclónica peligrosa e inundaciones por lluvias torrenciales. Read More >

    Click a location below for detailed forecast.

    Last Map Update: Fri, Sep. 8, 2017 at 3:54:29 pm EDT

         
      Storm Surge Warning    
         
      Hurricane Warning    
         
      Tropical Storm Warning    
         
      Flood Warning    
         
      Flash Flood Watch    
         
      Hurricane Watch    
         
      Hurricane Local Statement    
         
      Rip Current Statement    
         
      Hazardous Weather Outlook    
         
      Short Term Forecast    
     
     

     

     

     Hazardous Weather Headlines                                                                            
     HURRICANE WARNING ALL OF SOUTH FLORIDA
     STORM SURGE WARNING COASTAL AREAS

     

    Text Product Selector:

     — select a text product —   Area Forecast Discussion Coastal Hazards Message Coastal Waters Forecast Daily Climate Summary for Fort Lauderdale Daily Climate Summary for Miami Daily Climate Summary for Naples Daily Climate Summary for West Palm Beach Daily River and Lake Summary Fire Weather Forecast Fire Weather Smoke Management Forecast Fire Weather Watch/Red Flag Warning Fire Danger Rating Forecast Flash Flood Statement Flash Flood Warning Flood Statement Flood Watch Flood Warning Hazardous Weather Outlook Hourly Weather Roundup Hurricane Local Statement Hydrologic Outlook Hydrologic Summary Local Storm Report Local Tropical Cyclone Report Marine Weather Statement Monthly Climate Summary for Fort Lauderdale Monthly Climate Summary for Miami Monthly Climate Summary for Naples Monthly Climate Summary for West Palm Beach Non-Precipitation Hazards Message Point Forecast Matrices Public Information Statement Radar Coded Message Radar Status Message Record Event Report for Fort Lauderdale Record Event Report for Miami Record Event Report for Naples Record Event Report for West Palm Beach Regional Temp & Precip Table Severe Thunderstorm Warning Severe Weather Statement Short Term Forecast Special Marine Warning Special Weather Statement State Temp & Precip Table Terminal Aerodrome Forecast for KAPF Terminal Aerodrome Forecast for KFLL Terminal Aerodrome Forecast for KMIA Terminal Aerodrome Forecast for KPBI Terminal Aerodrome Forecast for KTMB Tornado Warning Tropical Disturbance Statement Tropical Weather Outlook Upper Air Sounding Freezing Level Upper Air Sounding Levels Upper Air Sounding Mandatory Levels Watch County Notification Winter Weather Message Zone Forecast Product   
  • A Better Way Forward on Title IX Enforcement? Remarks by Education Secy Betsy DeVos at George Mason University

    Secretary DeVos Prepared Remarks on Title IX EnforcementBetsy DeVos at George Mason U

    SEPTEMBER 7, 2017

    Thank you Dean Henry Butler for the kind introduction and for the opportunity to be here. Thank you President Angel Cabrera for your leadership of George Mason University.

    And to the students and faculty with us today, thank you for making time to be here during this busy day of classes.

    It is a great honor for me to be here today to address a very important topic.

    Earlier this year marked the 45th anniversary of Title IX, the landmark legislation passed by Congress that seeks to ensure: “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”

    The amendment to the Higher Education Act was initially proposed by Democrat Senator Birch Bayh, signed into law by Republican President Richard Nixon, and was later renamed for Congresswoman Patsy Mink, herself a victim of both sex-based and race-based discrimination as a third-generation Japanese-American.

    Mink’s law has served an important role in shaping our Nation’s educational environment.

    Title IX has helped to make clear that educational institutions have a responsibility to protect every student’s right to learn in a safe environment and to prevent unjust deprivations of that right.

    It is a responsibility I take seriously, and it is a responsibility that the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights takes seriously.

    We will continue to enforce it and vigorously address all instances where people fall short.

    Sadly, too many fall short when it comes to their responsibility under Title IX to protect students from sexual misconduct, acts of which are perpetrated on campuses across our nation.

    The individual impacts of sexual misconduct are lasting, profound, and lamentable. And the emotions around this topic run high for good reason.

    We need look no further than just outside these walls to see evidence of this. Yet I hope every person—even those who feel they disagree—will lend an ear to what I outline today.

    I’m glad we live in a country where an open debate of ideas is welcomed and encouraged. Debate, of course, comes with responsibilities. Violence is never the answer when viewpoints diverge.

    I appreciate that you have the opportunity to attend a university that promotes a higher level of discourse.

    So let me be clear at the outset: acts of sexual misconduct are reprehensible, disgusting, and unacceptable. They are acts of cowardice and personal weakness, often thinly disguised as strength and power.

    Such acts are atrocious, and I wish this subject didn’t need to be discussed at all.

    Every person on every campus across our nation should conduct themselves with self-respect and respect for others.

    But the current reality is a different story.

    Since becoming Secretary, I’ve heard from many students whose lives were impacted by sexual misconduct: students who came to campus to gain knowledge, and who instead lost something sacred.

    We know this much to be true: one rape is one too many.

    One assault is one too many.

    One aggressive act of harassment is one too many.

    One person denied due process is one too many.

    This conversation may be uncomfortable, but we must have it. It is our moral obligation to get this right.

    Campus sexual misconduct must continue to be confronted head-on. Never again will these acts only be whispered about in closed-off counseling rooms or swept under the rug.

    Not one more survivor will be silenced.

    We will not abandon anyone. We will amplify the voices of survivors who too often feel voiceless.

    While I listened to the stories of many survivors and their families over these past several months, I couldn’t help but think of my own family.

    I thought about my two daughters.

    And I thought about my two sons.

    Every mother dreads getting that phone call: a despondent child calling with unthinkable news.

    I cannot imagine receiving that call.

    Too many mothers and fathers are left on the other end of the line completely helpless. I have looked parents in their tear-filled eyes as they recounted their own stories, and each time their pain was palpable.

    I’m haunted by the story one brave young woman told me. She was targeted and victimized by her college boyfriend—someone she thought cared about her.

    He looked on as his roommate attempted to rape her. She escaped her harrowing encounter, but too many do not.

    For too many, an incident like this means something even worse.

    There is no way to avoid the devastating reality of campus sexual misconduct: lives have been lost. Lives of victims. And lives of the accused.

    Some of you hearing my voice know someone who took his or her own life because they thought their future was lost; because they saw no way out; because they lost hope.

    One mother told me her son has attempted to take his life multiple times. Each time she opens the door to his bedroom, she doesn’t know whether she will find him alive or dead.

    No mother, no parent, no student should be living that reality.

    We are here today for those families. We need to remember that we’re not just talking about faceless “cases.”

    We are talking about people’s lives. Everything we do must recognize this before anything else.

    And we’re here today because the previous administration helped elevate this issue in American public life. They listened to survivors, who have brought this issue out from the backrooms of student life offices and into the light of day.

    I am grateful to those who endeavored to end sexual misconduct on campuses.

    But good intentions alone are not enough. Justice demands humility, wisdom and prudence.

    It requires a serious pursuit of truth. And so, this is why I recently hosted a summit to better understand all perspectives: survivors, falsely accused students and educational institutions, both K-12 and higher ed. I wanted to learn from as many as I could because a conversation that excludes some becomes a conversation for none. We are having this conversation with and for all students.

    Here is what I’ve learned: the truth is that the system established by the prior administration has failed too many students.

    Survivors, victims of a lack of due process, and campus administrators have all told me that the current approach does a disservice to everyone involved.

    That’s why we must do better, because the current approach isn’t working.

    Washington has burdened schools with increasingly elaborate and confusing guidelines that even lawyers find difficult to understand and navigate.

    Where does that leave institutions, which are forced to be judge and jury?

    *Editor’s Note: From the Justice Department; Protecting Students from Sexual Assault (https://www.justice.gov/ovw/protecting-students-sexual-assault)

    “In a 2016 study released by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), an average of approximately 21% of undergraduate women across the nine schools participating in the study reported experiencing sexual assault since entering college. Non-heterosexual college females reported significantly higher rates than their heterosexual female peers. The majority of rape and sexual assault victims reported being victimized by someone they knew.1  

    “The 2016 BJS study also found that in the 2014-2015 academic year, an average of 6.4% of college women across the nine participating schools reported being victims of intimate partner violence. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly 50% of women report experiencing their first incident of intimate partner violence between 18 and 24 years of age.

    “Being a victim of sexual assault, especially rape, can negatively impact a student’s mental and physical health and academic outcomes.3  Being a victim of dating violence and intimate partner violence is related to a host of detrimental health and social functioning outcomes, such as academic failure, depression or anxiety, and alcohol and drug abuse. 

    “In a campus environment, students who are victimized by other students face unique challenges, such as close proximity to perpetrators and difficulty maintaining anonymity. The majority of rape incidents of college students are unreported by victims – in the 2016 BJS study, only 7% reported the incident to a school official. Furthermore, most incidents of rape involve the consumption of alcohol or drugs and are less likely to be reported to campus officials

    Go to this page for a continuation of the paragraphs from the Justice Department that we’ve included in this DeVos speech:

    https://www.justice.gov/ovw/protecting-students-sexual-assault

  • Most People Fail to Do a Simple Statistical Task When Viewing Online Ratings and Reviews Leading to Purchase Inferior Products

    shopping onlineA Stanford study found that when choosing between two products online, people tend to favor products with more reviews despite the fact that the more-reviewed product is of lower quality.

    By Milenko Martinovich

    When evaluating online purchases, a product’s rating and number of reviews seem helpful to an unsure consumer.

    But how often do we scrutinize those figures to learn their true meaning? Not nearly enough, according to a recent study by Derek Powell, a postdoctoral research fellow at Stanford University. The study, which appeared Aug. 21 in Psychological Science, finds that most people fail to do a simple statistical task when viewing online ratings and reviews, leading them to purchase inferior products.

    Online shopping with touch book; image from Wikimedia

    When shopping online, consumers engage in a type of social learning by which they become informed from the decisions of others. For example, you’re probably more likely to purchase a book at the top of the New York Times’ best-sellers list or buy an app that’s been downloaded millions of times.

    But observing other people’s choices is only a part of social learning. The other is noting the resulting outcomes through mechanisms like online star ratings. But how people interpret — or fail to interpret — this data is affecting their decision-making in a negative way.

    The researchers presented 138 adults with a series of cellphone cases (in pairs) to purchase. Each case was accompanied by its average star rating and number of reviews. The star ratings varied minimally, but one of the cases always had 125 more reviews than the other.

    Across two experiments, the researchers found that participants preferred the case that had more reviews, despite the fact that the way they set up the experiment, that case was likely to be inferior. (The researchers assessed the product’s quality not by stars or reviews alone, but by analyzing millions of reviews on Amazon.com.)

    Think about it this way. Twenty-five people review a product and award an average 2.9 rating (out of five stars). While the rating is below average, there’s a possibility that with such few reviews the product may not be as poor as indicated, Powell said.

    Now imagine 150 consumers give that same product a 2.9 rating. That’s six times as many people rating the product below average. That should be a stronger signal of the product’s poor quality.

    Participants took the high number of reviews as a signal of quality, said Powell, rather than as an indicator of how accurately the review score should reflect the true quality of the product. Instead of conducting a rather simple statistical analysis to arrive at that conclusion, consumers are taking the number of reviews at face value.

    “What they’re doing is simply weighing cues,” Powell said. “People seem to have this belief that popularity is good and are willing to use that as an important cue when making decisions.”

    Powell and his fellow researchers found evidence of this trend beyond their experiments. They examined 15 million reviews of more than 350,000 actual products on Amazon.com and found that there was no relationship between the number of reviews and its rating.

    “It doesn’t necessarily mean that better things don’t become more popular,” said Powell, “but as a consumer, when you’re looking at this data point (number of reviews), it’s not telling you anything.”

    Overcoming this bias is difficult, Powell said, because consumers find comfort in popularity.

    “There are lots of contexts where following the herd is the rational thing to do,” he said. “If there isn’t enough information available, that can be a smart thing to do.

    “But what we’re arguing is that you have more information than just what people did; you also have what happened — did they like it, were they happy or unhappy with their purchase.”

    Powell suggests consumers should focus on whether the product’s score is above or below average — product averages usually range from 3.7 to 4, depending on the product’s category, he said – then apply that rating to the number of reviews. Examining those figures in concert should supply consumers with confidence that the product’s rating reflects its true quality.

    The study’s co-authors are Jingqi Yu, Indiana University; and Melissa DeWolf and Keith Holyoak, UCLA.

  • Labor Day 2017: The International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union (ILGWU) Was Once One of the Largest in the US

    ILGWU women in1960

    ILGWU* women marching in a Labor Day parade with placards that read, “’60 is the year to vote reaction out.” by Kheel Center, Cornell University, via Flickr

    Through the years the nation gave increasing emphasis to Labor Day. The first governmental recognition came through municipal ordinances passed during 1885 and 1886. From these, a movement developed to secure state legislation. The first state bill was introduced into the New York legislature, but the first to become law was passed by Oregon on February 21, 1887. During the year four more states — Colorado, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York — created the Labor Day holiday by legislative enactment. By the end of the decade Connecticut, Nebraska, and Pennsylvania had followed suit. By 1894, 23 other states had adopted the holiday in honor of workers, and on June 28 of that year, Congress passed an act making the first Monday in September of each year a legal holiday in the District of Columbia and the territories.

     Who Are We Celebrating?: 159.8 million

     The number of people age 16 and over in the nation’s labor force as of May 2017. 

     Our Jobs

     Largest Occupations, May 2016                                                      Number of Employees

     Retail salespersons                                                                                           4,528,550

     Cashiers                                                                                                              3,541,010

     Combined food preparation and serving workers,                                               3,426,090  including fast food

     Office clerks, general                                                                                           2,955,550

     Registered nurses                                                                                                2,857,180

     Customer service representatives                                                                       2,707,040

     Laborers and freight, stock and material movers, hand                                      2,587,900

     Waiters and waitresses                                                                                       2,564,610

     Secretaries and administrative assistants, except legal,                                      2,295,510

     medical and executive

     General and operations managers                                                                   2,188,870 

     16.3 million: The number of wage and salary workers age 16 and over represented by a union in 2016. This group included both union members (14.6 million) and workers who reported no union affiliation but whose jobs were covered by a union contract (1.7 million). Among states, New York continued to have the highest union membership rate (23.6 percent), and South Carolina had the lowest rate (1.6 percent). 

    15.3 million: The number of employed female workers age 16 and over in service occupations in 2015. Among male workers age 16 and over, 11.7 million were employed in service-related occupations. 

     1.8%: The percentage increase in employment, or 143.7 million, in the United States between December 2015 and December 2016. In December 2016, the 344 U.S. counties with 75,000 or more jobs accounted for 72.8 percent of total U.S. employment and 78.1 percent of total wages. These 344 counties had a net job growth of 1.4 million over the year, which accounted for 80.7 percent of the overall US employment increase. 

     Another Day, Another Dollar:  $51,212 and $40,742:  The 2015 real median earnings for male and female full-time, year-round workers, respectively. The 2015 real median household income of $56,516, an increase in real terms of 5.2 percent from the 2014 median of $53,718. This is the first annual increase in median household income since 2007, the year before the most recent recession. 

    $77,166: The 2015 median Asian household income, the highest among race groups. The median income of non-Hispanic, white households was $62,950 and for black households it was $36,898. For Hispanic households the median income was $45,148. 

    Fastest Growing Jobs, 108.0%:  The projected percentage growth from 2014 to 2024 in the number of wind turbine service technicians (4,400 jobs in 2014), the projected fastest-growing occupation. Meanwhile, the occupation expected to add the greatest number of positions over this period is personal care aides (458,100).  

    Employee Benefits: 90.1%  The percentage of full-time, year-round workers ages 19 to 64 covered by health insurance during all or part of 2015. 

     Say Goodbye to Summer:  Labor Day is celebrated by most workers in America as the symbolic end of the summer and the start of the back-to-school season. 25,027 — The number of shoe stores for back-to-school shopping in 2015. Also catering to back-to-school needs were 28,910 family clothing stores; 7,885 department stores; 7,185 children and infants’ clothing stores; 6,475 office supply and stationery stores; and 6,870 book stores. 

     21,890: The number of sporting goods stores nationwide in 2015. Examples of these types of stores include athletic uniform supply, fishing supply and exercise equipment, as well as bicycle and golf pro shops. In US sports, college football teams usually play their first games the week before Labor Day, with the NFL traditionally playing its first game the Thursday following Labor Day.

     51,045: The number of travel agents employed full time, year-round in the United States in 2015. In addition, there were 17,915 tour and travel guides employed full time, year-round nationwide. On a weekend intended to give US workers a day of rest, many people climb into their drivers’ seats or board an airplane for a quick end of the summer getaway.

    921,654: The number of paid employees (for the pay period including March 12) who worked for a gasoline station in the United States in 2015. Oregon (11,003 paid gasoline station employees) and New Jersey (18,095 paid gasoline station employees) are the only states without self-service gasoline stations. Oregon was the first state to make Labor Day a holiday in February 1887. 

    The Commute to Work, 6.5 million: The number of commuters who left for work between midnight and 4:59 a.m. in 2015. They represented 4.6 percent of all commuters. The most common time was between 7 a.m. and 7:29 a.m. — with 20.9 million commuters.  

    4.6%: The percentage of workers age 16 and over who worked at home in 2015. 

    76.6%: The percentage of workers age 16 and over who drove alone to work in 2015. Another 9.0 percent carpooled and 0.6 percent biked to work. 

    26.4 minutes: The average time it took workers in the United States to commute to work in 2015. New York (33.1 minutes) and Maryland (32.6 minutes) had the most time-consuming commutes. 

    *The International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union (ILGWU) was once one of the largest labor unions in the United States, one of the first US unions to have a primarily female membership, and a key player in the labor history of the 1920s and 1930s.

  • What Berkeley Needs is a Non-Violent Containment Squad

    FSM pix of Berkeley demonstration

    November 20, 1964: March to Regents’ Meeting; L to R: Mona Hutchin, Ron Anastasi, … John Leggett, John Searle, Michael Rossman, Jack Weinberg, Sallie Shawl, Mario Savio, Ken Cloke. Bob Johnson photo ©FSM Archives All rights reserved

    by Jo Freeman, A.B.’65

    As an alumnus of the 1964 Free Speech Movement and a veteran of the civil rights movement, I was appalled to read about the recent violent confrontations in Berkeley.

    Those reports took me back to the 1960s when I was doing voter registration for the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and marching against segregation in Birmingham and Mississippi.

    Then we were the equivalent of the “fascists” that Antifa and the black bloc are beating up in Berkeley. They called us Communists, not fascists, but like Antifa they believed we were invaders who held them and their Southern values in contempt. The local whites whose towns we marched in burned us with their hate stares, blistered our ears with their curses, threw bottles and firecrackers at us, drove cars into our march lines, and sometimes used fists and bats. Guns were visible. Occasionally someone was shot.

    Sometimes law enforcement stood between us and our detractors, their faces and rifles always pointed at us, and sometimes they took a vacation, leaving us to the will of the crowd.

    Sound familiar?

    What we learn from these comparisons is that when a group or a person significantly dissents from deeply held community-wide views it will be attacked when it publicly challenges those views, and the attackers will feel justified without any concern for “free speech” as a more important value.

    That is dangerous. As UC Berkeley’s Chancellor Carol Christ put it “Once you embark on the path to censorship, you make your own speech vulnerable to it.”

    The University demonstrated the truth of that in its own evolving policies. In the 1930s UC President Gordon Sproul imposed limits on who could speak on campus to persons approved by the administration in order to avoid “exploitation” of the university’s prestige. Although aimed at Communists, over time the speaker ban expanded to anyone deemed controversial, including Malcolm X, Nobel Laureate Linus Pauling, and socialist members of the British Parliament. Candidates for public office, including Adlai Stevenson and Richard Nixon, stood in city streets to address students gathered on campus.

    In 1963, President Clark Kerr and Governor Pat Brown finally persuaded the Regents to abolish the restrictive rules. At that time, state schools in the South would not have permitted anyone to speak on campus in favor of integration. Indeed, at that time Southern whites thought Communism and integration were one and the same. Professors and public school teachers who didn’t stand up for segregation were fired.

    After the UC speaker ban was abolished, the student organization SLATE sponsored a series of controversial speakers, including a couple Communists, Malcolm X and an officer of the American Nazi Party. While there was some picketing, there was no violence. Students responded to statements that they did not like with silence, punctuated by laughter.

    That was the right response.

    Now people with unpopular views can’t even get a hearing, let alone laughter.

    What to do?

    Working in the civil rights movement taught me the power of non-violence. It’s time to revive that approach. Imagine that when the few dozen Antifas put on their masks and grab their weapons and start pushing people around, that they are surrounded by even more people, trained in non-violence, who link arms and repeatedly tell them to stop. Mass repudiation is a very powerful way to contain potential violence.

    Joining a non-violent containment squad requires training. You have to be prepared to withstand verbal, and maybe some physical, abuse, all the while keeping your voice down and your hands down. And you have to outnumber those you are trying to contain. To succeed, non-violence requires patience and discipline. Something the black bloc doesn’t seem to understand.

    Establishing a non-violent containment squad can’t be done by a state agency, such as the University or the police. Too many legal complications. But it could be done by the churches, or by an independent group committed to non-violence. That’s how it started in the South. Long before the sit-ins hit the airwaves, students and young people were being trained in non-violence. Some of the people who did that training are still alive, as are many who practiced it.

    They should train others in how to do confrontation the right way — nonviolently.

    ©2017 Jo Freeman for SeniorWomen.com

  • Past Is Present, Revival Jewelry: “Reviving and Reinterpreting Antique Styles For a New Age”

    Revival Jewelry

    Exploring more than 4,000 years of jewelry history, an exhibition organized by the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (MFA), traces the long-standing tradition of drawing design inspiration from the past — whether by directly copying earlier styles or reinterpreting ancient motifs. Past Is Present: Revival Jewelry includes 80 objects by jewelers such as Castellani, Tiffany & Co., Cartier and Bulgari, ranging from antiquity to today and showing that the revivalist narrative did not end in the early 20th century.

    In nearly every instance, the design of the ornament highlights the tension between progress and the desire to engage with the past, in both traditional and unexpected ways. Drawn largely from the Museum’s collection and featuring 17 stunning loans from private collections, Past Is Present: Revival Jewelry is on view through August 19, 2018 in the Rita J. and Stanley H. Kaplan Family Foundation Gallery.  MFA members are the first to see the exhibition during Member Preview days, Saturday, February 11 through Monday, February 13. 

    “History fuels the creative imagination. The dazzling jewels in this exhibition were made by designers who found inspiration from the past — reviving and reinterpreting antique styles for a new age,” said Emily Stoehrer, Rita J. Kaplan and Susan B. Kaplan Curator of Jewelry. “Today, as technology continues to advance and life’s pace continues to accelerate the traditions of the past, from ancient Egypt to the Renaissance, continue to provoke and inspire.”

    Revival jewelry became fashionable in the 19th century, as opportunities for travel increased; archaeological digs unearthed ancient treasures and newly founded museums (including the MFA) and international expositions showcased discoveries from antiquity. Surrounded by this history, jewelers were among the many artists who found inspiration in the myriad of freshly available visual resources, incorporating them into their work. While jewelry from the 19th and early 20th centuries explored many revival styles, the exhibition largely focuses on four: archaeological (inspired by newly excavated art and artifacts), as well as Renaissance, Egyptian and Classical. Additionally, contemporary pieces demonstrate how the revival jewelry tradition continues today as artists are once again drawn back in time, focusing on hands-on craftsmanship and the exploration of timeless themes that first presented themselves hundreds, or, in some cases, thousands of years ago.

    Four loans from the Cartier Collection are a highlight of the exhibition. After the discovery of King Tutankhamen’s tomb in 1922, Louis Cartier, like many other jewelers at the time, bolstered his collection of ancient artifacts and incorporated them into his work. A 1924 Scarab Brooch, which can be converted into a belt buckle, is paired with a Winged Scarab (740–660 BC) from the MFA’s collection. The 20th-century brooch features gold, platinum, and diamonds in addition to ancient faience (glazed ceramic) fragments; and the holes, meant to secure the Egyptian ornament to linen mummy wrappings, have been hidden behind emeralds. A Bracelet (1928) created for composer Cole Porter’s wife Linda integrates a replica of an ancient Eye of Horus — a protective amulet thought to have healing properties — offering another example of Cartier’s celebrated Egyptian revival designs. The Head of Medusa Pendant (1906) and Chimera Bracelet (1929) set with diamonds, meanwhile, draw inspiration from ancient mythology.

    Connections among travel, politics and nostalgia in 19th-century jewelry are explored through examples of pieces that would have been bought as mementos on the Grand Tour. Regarded as a rite of passage and a critical component of classical education, a trip across Europe was a luxury that could be drawn out for years. As travelers collected souvenirs along the way, cities became known for particular types of jewelry. A Coral Suite (1850s) from Naples comprises a necklace, earrings and brooch, featuring carved depictions of Bacchus — the ancient Roman god of wine — rams and female figures, surrounded by delicate gold leaves and grapes. Referencing classical life, imagery of jovial gods and goddesses appeared often in ornaments acquired in Italy, which was seen as the birthplace of modern civilization and the essential stop on the Grand Tour.

    As 19th-century archaeologists unearthed ancient treasures from the Mediterranean world, nationalism was also sweeping through Europe. Both long-established and newly independent countries — and their jewelers — sought a national vernacular that evoked the glorious past. In England, designers like Charlotte Newman (known as Mrs. Philip Newman) explored Renaissance themes, as seen in her Cameo Necklace of Elizabeth I (about 1890). Carved by Georges Bissinger, the pendant shows a profile image of the 16th-century monarch, whose reign was often compared at the time with that of Queen Victoria. 

    Etruscan Revival Bracelet

    Ernesto Pierret, Etruscan Revival Bracelet, Italian,  About 1860. Gold. Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

    In Italy, amidst advocacy for unification, Castellani — the most famous jeweler in Rome at the time — established itself as the premier retailer of revival jewelry. The shop, founded in 1814 by Fortunato Pio Castellani, sold high-style imported jewelry from Paris until around 1850, when Castellani’s sons Alessandro and Augusto, who were outspoken in their desire for Italian unification, resolved to specialize in archaeological revival jewelry that celebrated the early gold work that was being excavated just outside Rome. One example is the gold Castellani Brooch (about 1858) that copies the design of an Etruscan original, excavated in 1836 from a tomb in Cerveteri, Italy and now part of the Campana Collection at the Louvre.

    A selection of paintings in the exhibition, including Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s Bocca Baciata (Lips That Have Been Kissed) (1859) and the recent acquisition Belcolore (1863), additionally illustrate fashions that were popular in 19th-century jewelry. Typical of the artist’s work of this period, they present close-up views of beautiful women adorned with ornaments. The necklace of gold rosettes in Bocca Baciata was inspired by ancient jewelry, exemplifying the archaeological impulse that was popular at the time.

  • Climate Change and Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: RGGI States Announce Proposed Program Changes; Additional 30% Emissions Cap Decline by 2030

    Editor’s Note:  It was Monday’s New York Times Editorial, States Dare to Think Big,  that led me to the R.G..G.I. site. The passage of AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, marked a watershed moment in California’s history.  By requiring in law a sharp reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, California set the stage for its transition to a sustainable, low-carbon future.  AB 32 was the first program in the country to take a comprehensive, long-term approach to addressing climate change, and does so in a way that aims to improve the environment and natural resources while maintaining a robust economy. 

    Illustration: How to Help Someone Having an Asthma Attack by Wikihow

    asthma attacks

    The nine Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI)*, the nation’s first market-based regulatory program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, announced consensus on a set of draft program elements that will guide the RGGI states as they conduct final economic analysis and establish a post-2020 path forward for the program.

    The RGGI states have a long-standing record of leadership towards a clean energy economy, which continues with today’s proposal. The RGGI states propose a regional cap trajectory that will provide an additional 30% cap reduction by the year 2030, relative to 2020 levels. The proposed regional program changes include the addition of an Emissions Containment Reserve (ECR) wherein states can withhold allowances from auction if emission reduction costs are lower than projected. The proposed ECR is an innovative way to adaptively respond to supply and demand in the market.

    The announcement brings the RGGI states a step closer to the conclusion of a program review process lasting over a year, and incorporating comprehensive feedback from stakeholders and experts gathered through eight public meetings. More than 120 separate comments were submitted by experts, policymakers, and organizations, as well as more than 29,000 personal comments and petition signatures.

    Next Steps

    The RGGI states will seek stakeholder comment on the draft program elements in a public meeting to be held on September 25th . Materials, including a stakeholder meeting notice and a supplementary table of year-by-year regional numbers, are posted to the RGGI, Inc. website; additional materials will be provided prior to the public meeting.

    After reviewing stakeholder comments, conducting additional economic analysis, and releasing updated materials including a revised Model Rule, states will follow state-specific statutory and regulatory processes to propose updates to their CO2 Budget Trading Programs.

  • Vehicle Standards Should Be Strengthened to Expand Choice, Save Consumers Money; Charter For Advisory Committee for Sustained National Climate Assessment Expires

     

    *Other articles to view (below)

    Other Controversial US Governmental Decisionmaking: 

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the formal reopening and expansion ofitsmidterm evaluation for new vehicle greenhouse gas standards for model years 2021-2025. The standards, originally set in 2012, were the culmination of a historic agreement between automakers, labor, consumer and environmental groups, California, and the federal government to establish “one national program.”

    In response to EPA’s announcement today, Consumers Union, the policy and mobilization arm of Consumer Reports,  issued the following statement:

    “By reopening the midterm evaluation, EPA is bringing back questions that have already been asked and answered. In fact, EPA concluded a thorough assessment earlier this year that found the targets through 2025 could be met at an even lower cost than EPA had previously estimated,” said Shannon Baker-Branstetter, policy counsel for Consumers Union.

    “And by expanding the review to include Model Year 2021, EPA is opening the door even further to eroding standards beyond what was previously contemplated. If EPA goes through with its review, they should leave 2021 off the table and they must conduct a fair, transparent assessment that includes the voices of consumers. If progress toward more efficient vehicles is put in reverse, consumers are the ones who will bear the financial burden.”

    “Consumers want to save money on gas and they want government to help them by continuing to set strong standards for cars, trucks and SUVs, according to our latest surveys,” said Baker-Branstetter. “In fact, consumers are especially concerned about the fuel efficiency of the crossovers and SUVs they’ve been gravitating toward in recent years. Larger vehicles have the most room for improvement, so maintaining, or even strengthening, standards [are] critical to protect fuel savings for consumers.”

    Hurricane Sandy Damage

    • The Trump administration let the charter for the Advisory Committee for the Sustained National Climate Assessment  expire on Sunday, August 20th. On Friday, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s acting administrator informed the head of the 15-person federal advisory panel that NOAA would not renew the committee tasked with creating actionable plans for the National Climate Review, a recurring report that’s next due in 2018. (The Washington Post)
    •  Trump administration disbands federal advisory committee on climate …   The Trump administration has decided to disband the federal advisory panel for the National Climate Assessment, a group aimed at helping policymakers and private-sector officials incorporate the government’s climate analysis into long-term planning. The charter for the 15-person Advisory Committee for the Sustained National Climate Assessment – which includes academics as well as local officials and corporate representatives – expires Sunday. On Friday, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s acting administrator, Ben Friedman, informed the committee’s chair that the agency would not renew the panel. 

    • Editor’s Note: Image of Hurricane Sandy’s damage to New Jersey Shore from the Joint Forces Staff College

  • Updated: HHS Establishing Medical Shelter to Aid Those Affected by Hurricane Harvey: “Do Not Go To The Attic: Go To The Roof”

    donald Trump at video conference in White House

    President Donald J. Trump leads a video teleconference monitoring the current tropical storm conditions in southeastern Texas| August 27, 2017 (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

    The New York Times has published that the National Weather Service has declared: “Unprecedented.” The effects associated with Tropical Storm Harvey are “unprecedented” and “unknown and beyond anything experienced,” the National Weather Service said in a tweet.

    Houston’s Hospitals Treat Storm Victims and Become Victims Themselves

    Hurricanes’ government site: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/ 

    https://twitter.com/GovAbbott 

    HHS establishing medical shelter to aid those affected by Hurricane Harvey

    HHS Secretary Price declares public health emergency in Louisiana due to Hurricane Harvey

    Critical updates will also be available at:

    FEMA’s Tips on Hurricane Harvey: 

    Texas | 4322

    Hurricane Harvey + FEMA

    Hurricane Harvey

     Continue to listen to local officials. Find up-to-date resources and information on the federal response to Harvey.

    Emergency Phone Numbers

    • Only call 911 if you have an immediate need for medical attention or evacuation assistance.
      • If you can’t get through to 911 on first try, keep calling.
    • Another option is to place a call to one of five numbers for the Houston Command Center of the United States Coast Guard. The numbers are:
      • 281-464-4851
      • 281-464-4852
      • 281-464-4853
      • 281-464-4854
      • 282-464-4855

    Key Safety Tips

        • Continue to listen to local officials.
        • Only call 911 if you have an immediate need for medical attention or evacuation assistance.
        • Don’t drive on flooded roadways. Remember – turn around, don’t drown.
        • If you are in a high rise building and need to shelter in place, go to the first or second floor hallways or interior rooms. You want to stay on floors above floodwater or storm surge, but do not go to the highest floors due to wind impacts.
        • If you are under a tornado warning, seek shelter immediately in the center of a small interior room (closet, interior hallway) on the lowest level of a sturdy building. Put as many walls as possible between you and the outside.
        • More safety tipshurricanesfloodingtornadoes. Also in Spanish.

    Rumor Control

    Rumor:

    FEMA charges for services such as damage inspections or contractor repairs.

    Fact:

    Scam artists may pose as government officials, aid workers, charitable organizations or insurance company employees.

    • Ask for identification and don’t be afraid to hang up on cold callers.
    • Contact government agencies using information posted on their websites or in other official sources.
    • Don’t sign anything you don’t understand or contracts with blank spaces.

    This Section is Collapsed. Click to ExpandResources

    This Section is Collapsed. Click to ExpandApply For Assistance

    This Section is Collapsed. Click to ExpandNews & Social Media

    This Section is Collapsed. Click to ExpandTexas Emergency Management Offices

    This Section is Collapsed. Click to ExpandLouisiana Emergency Preparedness

    This Section is Collapsed. Click to ExpandNational Flood Insurance Program

    Hurricane Harvey

    Continue to listen to local officials. Find up-to-date resources and information on the federal response to Harvey.

  • A Scrim of Memory; A Meditation on Reunions

    by Joan L. Cannon

     

    Family Reunion

     

    Christmas Homecoming, December 25, 1948, Norman Rockwell, Saturday Evening Post

    There are a host of freighted words in our wonderful language. They include so many connotations in addition to simple denotations that they almost demand dissertations.

    Think about reunion. Nowadays when the fashion is to press children into adult molds earlier and earlier in their lives,  I’ve heard of kindergarten reunions. My own children were invited to eighth grade ones, and it goes on from there. I went to my own 40th high school reunion and my 50th college one. It was that one that made me swear off that kind of gathering.

    The first problem is that we know (if we’re honest about it) that we’re in for surprises both pleasant and not so much. It seems these gatherings force an automatic exercise in comparisons. Every attendee has to face unstated competition as intense as that for college acceptance;  it’s just based on different criteria. How have I aged in appearance compared with my classmates? Can I match the average for marriage,  number of children, implied income, social status, renown?  

    Read more: http://www.seniorwomen.com/news/index.php/a-scrim-of-memory-a-meditation-on-reunions