Author: SeniorWomenWeb

  • Stateline: Search and Rescue Teams, Already Stretched Thin, See Surge in Calls

    search and rescue

    Members of the Rocky Mountain Rescue Group in Colorado wear masks and gloves during a mission earlier this year. The pandemic is compounding many issues that have challenged search and rescue teams in recent years;  Courtesy of Rocky Mountain Rescue

    July 6, 2020

    By: Alex Brown, Stateline, Pew Trusts

    When search and rescue volunteers in Utah’s Washington County received three separate calls for help on a recent Sunday, every available member of the team was deployed in response. As they tended to injured hikers and mountain bikers, things quickly went from bad to worse.

    “Before we were done with the third call, we got a fourth one, and five minutes after that we got a fifth one,” said Sgt. Darrell Cashin, who serves as the county sheriff’s liaison to volunteer rescue teams in southwest Utah.

    Cashin was forced to split off team members to respond to the new situations, while also deploying sheriff’s deputies, who lacked technical rescue training. Responders made it through the day, but Cashin — along with many other search and rescue, or SAR, leaders across the country — warns that the pandemic is compounding already significant challenges.

    Nearly all search and rescue missions in the United States are handled by volunteer teams, who mostly pay for their own equipment and work under a patchwork of guidelines and government oversight that can vary widely by state.

    The pandemic has led some older and higher-risk members to stay home, while others who have lost work or changed jobs no longer have the money or flexibility to deploy. And the need to postpone or cancel in-person training means fewer new volunteers, accelerating a long-term problem. The pandemic also has forced teams to adjust rescue practices for social distancing and buy protective equipment such as masks.

    “We’ve been very taxed,” Cashin said. “When COVID came out, I really thought our rescues were going to drop through the floor. But we’re actually having a record year at this point, with a diminished capacity to respond. It was like the floodgates opened. It’s been rescue after rescue after rescue, and it’s not stopped.”

    In response, lawmakers in several states are considering proposals ranging from providing state funding for programs and workers’ compensation insurance for volunteers to charging people for their rescues.

    A Long-Building Problem

    For several years, rescuers in many parts of the country have seen a dramatic uptick in calls for help. That’s in part because more Americans are going outside; the National Park Service has seen more than 300 million visitors each of the last five years, the highest numbers on record.

    And in its 2018 visitation report, the latest available, the U.S. Forest Service noted an increase of nearly 1 million visitors per year over each of the last five years to a new high of 150 million.

    Many of the newcomers to public lands are inexperienced and lack the appropriate gear, skills or fitness for major excursions. SAR leaders say they often have to rescue hikers who become lost when their phone loses its signal or dies, or who try to summit a mountain they saw on Instagram without researching the terrain or weather.

  • Rose Madeline Mula Writes: Addicted to Amazon

    by Rose Madeline MulaAmazon Box outside door

    I thought that being confined to my home and blocked from stores by the COVID19 restrictions would save me a ton of money.  I was wrong. I was forgetting something.  Amazon.com.

    Yes, this insidious site has been lurking on my keyboard forever, but I never visited it until a couple of months ago when I needed new reading glasses and realized I couldn’t go to the Dollar Store (yes, that’s where I buy them).  No problem.  Ordering them on Amazon and getting free delivery (and free return shipping if for any reason they didn’t meet my expectations) was easy.  Too easy.

    Gradually, I purchased other essential items on Amazon — pens, batteries, printer paper,  hair color, shampoo…  But it wasn’t long before non-essentials started creeping onto the list — new sneakers to add to the four pairs in my closet which I haven’t worn since 2012, six coffee mugs I saw online which I don’t need and have no cabinet space for (but they’re so pretty!),  an extra quilt for my bed (also unnecessary and also pretty, and way too bulky to store anywhere)… But those are just the tip of the iceberg. In fact, if icebergs were available for sale on Amazon, I would be tempted to buy one of those as well because you never know when the power might go out and reduce all those Lean Cuisines in my freezer to low-calorie/high-sodium slush.

    But, of course, even Amazon can’t provide icebergs. Instead, they have been selling me an eclectic hodge-podge of miscellany which I don’t need, including a few items which I never even knew existed before their images sneaked up, hooked me, and reeled me in as I surfed the Internet.

    Did you know, for example, that you can buy dish washer-safe stove burner protectors which fit under your burner grids and catch all the boil-over spills that would otherwise stain your stove and become a permanent part of your kitchen decor?  Yes, you can. I did.  I also bought toaster bags — reusable, washable, plasticized paper pouches that safely go into my toaster, oven, or microwave and help turn out perfect grilled cheese sandwiches, baked potatoes, chicken nuggets, panini, and an unlimited number of other tasty treats. Who could resist that? Not me.

    Another irresistible ad convinced me I needed miniature metal “skis” for my walker’s back “feet” to enable it to move faster. Why? It’s a walker, not a racer. But why not? It was easier to simply click on the “Buy It Now” bar than to think about it. So I did. The fact that I rarely use the walker didn’t deter me.

    My other impulse purchases on Amazon include a string of mini, solar-powered lights to brighten my quarantined balcony; a label maker (which I have used to make two labels since buying it a year ago); a roll-up keyboard (in place of the Steinway I can’t afford and have no room for) which I immediately rolled up and put in a drawer before plinking even one melody; a five-pound bag of gum drops (yes, five pounds!); essential oils (which were certainly not essential); make up (too little, too late), and a garden kneeler.  No, I don’t have a garden. I live in a third-floor condo. But I’m hoping it will help me get up when (not if) I fall so I don’t have to call the firemen (though, actually, their visits are the highlight of my social life).

    No need to fill in a billing address, shipping address, and credit card info. Amazon has it all stored in its inexhaustible memory and prints it all with just one click. If I had to stumble to another room to dig out my credit card, and then type in all those details, it would give me time to ask myself if I really need those items or still another veggie chopper… moisturizer… exercise DVD… …or dress.

    Yes, I now also buy most of my clothes on Amazon. The problem with that is they never look as good on me as they do on the models in the ads. The last two dresses I bought that looked casual yet fashionably chic online unfortunately look more like nightgowns on me. However, it was easier to keep them and add them to my burgeoning dreamland wardrobe rather than risk exposure to COVID19 by going out to return them. Unfortunately, since they’re supposed to be dresses, it gives me an excuse not to bother changing out of them in the morning.

    Hey, wait a minute! It just occurred to me that this may explain my daytime sleepiness. Since I’m wearing my nightgown, my brain doesn’t recognize that it’s time to wake up! Tomorrow I’m wearing that power suit I bought decades ago — and maybe even shoes.
    Actually that suit will come in handy for my weekly Zoom get-together with friends I worked with in a former lifetime. They seem to have trouble recognizing me. Maybe because I never wore nightgowns to the office. Next week I’ll wear the suit to Zoomtown. Hopefully that will help.

    And to prod their memories further I just made another purchase on Amazon of something I never knew existed — a ring light consisting of a circle of tiny bulbs that clips onto a cell phone or computer. Supposedly it softens wrinkles and diminishes under-eye shadows. I’m now trying to figure out if I can possibly attach it to a headband so I can wear it all the time and look just as young in person as I now hope to online.

    To further enhance my Zoom persona, I also mined Amazon for some wireless ear pods so I won’t have to keep shouting “What?” every few seconds.

    I remember when none of these treasures were available on Amazon. It was strictly an online bookstore. It hasn’t forgotten its roots. It’s still my go-to source of the written word — from the classics to today’s best-selling novels, biographies, how-to’s… most of which
    are available as traditional hard-cover, as well as ebooks — which are a boon for me since their lower prices are much more budget friendly.  Also, I ran out of bookcase space before James Patterson ran out of ideas for still another mystery.

    This buying binge has got to stop. I got my Visa bill this morning and it sent my already dangerously high blood pressure soaring. I understand meditation should help, but I don’t know how to meditate.

    I think I’ll check Amazon. I bet they’ve got some good books and tapes to guide me.

    ©2020 Rose Madeline Mula for SeniorWomen.com


    Editor’s Note:  Rose Mula’s most recent book is Confessions of a Domestically-Challenged Homemaker &  Other Tall Tales, available at Amazon.com and other online booksellers.  Grandmother Goose: Rhymes for a Second Childhood is available as an e-book on Amazon.com for the Kindle and at BarnesandNoble.com for the Nook at $2.99; the paperback edition is available for $9.95.   Her website is rosemadelinemula.com.  
  • To Become a Citizen After Birth, You Must: Apply For “derived” or “acquired” Citizenship Through Parents; Apply for Naturalization

    Bridges to Citizenship

    Bridges to Citizenship Fall Institute in Seattle, WA, September 9-10, 2015. Participants design a concept of an outreach flier to inform immigrant patrons about library services.

    U.S. Citizenship

    If you meet certain requirements, you may become a US citizen either at birth or after birth.

    To become a citizen at birth, you must:

    • Have been born in the United States or certain territories or outlying possessions of the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; OR  
    • had a parent or parents who were citizens at the time of your birth (if you were born abroad) and meet other requirements

    To become a citizen after birth, you must:

    For more information, see USCIS Policy Manual Citizenship and Naturalization Guidance

    The Naturalization Test

    Most naturalization applicants are required to take a test on:

    • English
    • Civics (U.S. history and government)

    We provide resources to help you prepare. For more information, visit our Naturalization Test page. Get study materials from the Citizenship Resource Center.

    Citizenship for Military Members and Dependents

    Members and veterans of the U.S. armed forces and their dependents may be eligible for special naturalization provisions. For more information, visit our Citizenship for Military Personnel & Family Members page.

    Dual Citizenship

    For information on dual citizenship, visit the U.S. Department of State Services Dual Nationality website.

    The Value of Citizenship

    The United States has a long history of welcoming immigrants from all parts of the world. America values the contributions of immigrants who continue to enrich this country and preserve its legacy as a land of freedom and opportunity.

    Deciding to become a U.S. citizen is one of the most important decisions in an individual’s life. If you decide to apply to become a U.S. citizen, you will be showing your commitment to the United States and your loyalty to its Constitution. In return, you are rewarded with all the rights and privileges that are part of U.S. citizenship.

    The Naturalization Test

    To become a naturalized U.S. citizen, you must pass the naturalization test. At your naturalization interview, you will be required to answer questions about your application and background. You will also take an English and civics test unless you qualify for an exemption or waiver.

    For more information, see USCIS Policy Manual English and Civics Testing Guidance.  

    Study Materials

    USCIS offers a variety of study materials, including:

    These and other citizenship resources for immigrants, educators, and organizations are available on the Citizenship Resource Center website.

    Exceptions from English and Civics Requirements

    For information on exceptions or modifications to the English and civics requirements for naturalization, visit our Exceptions and Accommodations page.

    If You Don’t Pass

    You will be given two opportunities to take the English and civics tests and to answer all questions relating to your naturalization application in English. If you fail any of the tests at your initial interview, you will be retested on the portion of the test that you failed (English or civics) between 60 and 90 days from the date of your initial interview. See 8 CFR 312.5(a) and 335.3(b).

     


  • Hollowed-Out Public Health System Faces More Cuts Amid Virus; “When we do our job, nothing happens”

    July 1, 2020NPR photo

    A mural in Seattle’s Capitol Hill neighborhood (left) and a poster in the Central District (right) are signs of the times, as information about the coronavirus outbreak evolves quickly. Chona Kasinger for NPR

    The US public health system has been starved for decades and lacks the resources to confront the worst health crisis in a century.

    Marshaled against a virus that has sickened at least 2.6 million in the US, killed more than 126,000 people and cost tens of millions of jobs and $3 trillion in federal rescue money, state and local government health workers on the ground are sometimes paid so little that they qualify for public aid.

    They track the coronavirus on paper records shared via fax. Working seven-day weeks for months on end, they fear pay freezes, public backlash and even losing their jobs.

    Since 2010, spending for state public health departments has dropped by 16% per capita and spending for local health departments has fallen by 18%, according to a KHN and Associated Press analysis of government spending on public health. At least 38,000 state and local public health jobs have disappeared since the 2008 recession, leaving a skeletal workforce for what was once viewed as one of the world’s top public health systems.

    KHN and AP interviewed more than 150 public health workers, policymakers and experts, analyzed spending records from hundreds of state and local health departments, and surveyed statehouses. On every level, the investigation found, the system is underfunded and under threat, unable to protect the nation’s health.

    Dr. Robert Redfield, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said in an interview in April that his “biggest regret” was “that our nation failed over decades to effectively invest in public health.”

    So when this outbreak arrived — and when, according to public health experts, the federal government bungled its response — hollowed-out state and local health departments were ill-equipped to step into the breach.

    Over time, their work had received so little support that they found themselves without direction, disrespected, ignored, even vilified. The desperate struggle against COVID-19 became increasingly politicized and grew more difficult.

    States, cities and counties in dire straits have begun laying off and furloughing members of already limited staffs, and even more devastation looms, as states reopen and cases surge. Historically, even when money pours in following crises such as Zika and H1N1, it disappears after the emergency subsides. Officials fear the same thing is happening now.

  • Stateline: Politicians Shunt Aside Public Health Officials

    Amy Acton fan club

    Read Stateline coverage of the latest state action on coronavirus.

    By: Christine Vestal & Michael Ollove, Stateline, Pew Trusts

    Four months into the pandemic, some governors and local officials are sidelining public health professionals in a rush to reboot their state economies, even as infections and hospitalizations increase in many areas of the country.

    Photo: Becker1999 from Grove City, OH; Wikimedia

    Shunted to the background, and often ignored, public health professionals at the state and local levels who have been working long hours with few breaks are starting to burn out and lose momentum. Many have left office; a number of them were pushed out, either by their bosses or in the face of vehement public opposition.

    A recent analysis from Kaiser Health News and the Associated Press found that at least 27 state or local public health leaders across 13 states had resigned, retired or been fired since April.

    For at least a century, state and local public health agencies in the United States have been charged with protecting residents’ health and safety by monitoring infectious diseases and other health hazards, informing the public and taking action in an outbreak.

    That includes testing, disease surveillance, data gathering, contact tracing and education. It also entails support for the local medical community, including ensuring an adequate supply of personal protective equipment and other essential resources.

    But in this pandemic, top federal, state and local elected officials have taken the lead in performing those functions, not public health agencies.

    “It’s been a bit of an uncoordinated disaster,” said Lori Tremmel Freeman, CEO of the National Association of County and City Health Officials. “Now that we’re at the point of reopening communities — businesses, pools, summer camps — local health departments are back in the ballgame and left to enforce the governors’ [restrictive] orders, which basically villainizes them.

    “It’s really hard to be a partner in that work when you haven’t been allowed into the group that informed the decision,” she said.

    From the beginning of the pandemic, Freeman and other experts say, the White House set the tone for this unprecedented circumvention of public health agencies.

    States Have ‘Immense’ Powers to Fight Coronavirus

    anagement leaders and health experts from other agencies, diluting the historic leadership role of the nation’s primary public health authority, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Later, as the nation grew weary of quarantine, Trump flagrantly dismissed even his own health experts’ precautions in favor of jumpstarting the stalled economy.

    Similarly, governors, mayors and county executives in many parts of the country took the lead in the beginning of the crisis, setting up COVID-19 surveillance websites, outsourcing testing and contact tracing, and buying masks and other medical supplies from manufacturers.

    When governors and local elected leaders decided to reopen, often encouraged by vehement residents and business owners demanding an end to shutdown orders, many complied despite warnings from public health officials that infections were still rising.

    “We would agree on the metrics, a 14-day decline in infections, and then they would choose to ignore them,” said Freeman, the public health association CEO.

    Governors who relaxed some restrictions early insisted that keeping businesses closed for a prolonged time would cause too much economic suffering. Republican Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp was one of the first to begin allowing businesses to reopen in his state in April, without a 14-day decline in infections. At the time, he insisted the state could safely ease its lockdown, dismissing computer modeling showing that the peak had not yet arrived.

    While local public health officials in Georgia have objected to quickly reopening some businesses, Kemp’s public health director, Dr. Kathleen Toomey, has backed his decisions. Media reports said Toomey’s department released confusing and sometimes misleading data in support of relaxing restrictions. The number of coronavirus cases now is rising in Georgia, according to state data.

    “Georgia — go to the beach, lake or a state park!” Tim Fleming, Kemp’s chief of staff, wrote in a Facebook post after the governor lifted restrictions. “They are all open and despite what the media is reporting there have been no issues on Georgia beaches or lakes today.”

    COVID-19 Is Crushing Black Communities. Some States Are Paying Attention.

    Arizona also was quick to ease restrictions; it now is seeing its highest increases in cases since the pandemic began, and hospitals are nearing capacity.

    Republican Gov. Doug Ducey attributed that rise to increased testing, although Dr. Cara Christ, the state health director, conceded she didn’t know whether the rising numbers were the result of more testing or community spread of the disease.

    Danger Ahead

    Freeman’s group and the Big Cities Health Coalition this week issued a sharp warning that attacks on public health officials were compromising American safety.

    Noting that public health officials have been “physically threatened and scapegoated” and some forced out of their positions, the groups said, “We are losing expertise, experience, and most importantly, leadership, at a time when we need it most.”

    The groups said it is not individual attacks that are most damaging, but the sidelining of public health expertise in the midst of the most dangerous health crisis in more than a century.

    “At the federal, state, and local health levels,” the groups said, “new task forces have been created to guide COVID-19 decision-making, which lack the critical input of the public health brain trust and ignore that this virus has been and continues to be the most difficult and costly public health challenge of our lifetime.”

    While turnover of top health officials in federal and state government is normal, especially when administrations change, said Dr. Georges Benjamin, head of the American Public Health Association, “we’re seeing it happen at the local level, now.”

    “It’s a manifestation of the politicization of public health that many of us have been concerned about.”

    The divide between elected and public health officials has been further illustrated this week as Trump continued to insist on holding a maskless, indoor campaign rally in Tulsa this weekend, overruling the cautions of his own health advisers, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, who heads the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the director of the Tulsa health department, Dr. Bruce Dart.

    font-weight: normal;” href=”https://www.tulsaworld.com/news/local/tulsa-health-department-director-wishes-trump-rally-would-be-postponed-as-local-covid-cases-surge/article_bac51435-a5d0-5b5c-ba74-182047453d53.html” rel=”noopener noreferrer” target=”_blank”>told the Tulsa World, “I wish we could postpone this to a time when the virus isn’t as large a concern as it is today.”

    Trump dismissed the request, and his campaign is requiring attendees to sign waivers that they won’t sue should they become infected while at the rally.

    Officials Quit, Fired

    In Ohio, the state’s health director, Dr. Amy Acton, resigned from her post last week. Early in the pandemic, she was hailed in many quarters for her plainspoken explanations of state safety measures. As time went on, she drew vociferous attacks over the restrictions.

    Businesses such as gyms and concert venues sued her, lawmakers pushed to limit her authority, and protesters, some of them conspicuously armed, demonstrated outside her Columbus home.

  • GAO: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress appropriated $2.6 trillion in emergency assistance for people, businesses, the health care system, and state and local governments. How are federal agencies administering this spending?

    We found that the Small Business Administration processed over $512 billion in guaranteed small business loans, but isn’t ready to address fraud risks and hasn’t said how it plans to oversee the loans.

    Also, the IRS and Treasury made 160.4 million payments worth $269.3 billion to taxpayers as of May 31 — including payments to more than a million deceased individuals.

    Our recommendations address these and other issues.

    Signing pointing toward COVID-19 screening

    • Full Report
    • COVID-19 :

      Opportunities to Improve Federal Response and Recovery Efforts

      Report to the Congress
      GAO-20-625;  PUBLISHED: JUN 25, 2020 .  PUBLICLY RELEASED: JUN 25, 2020  
    • Highlights

      What GAO Found

      In response to the national public health and economic threats caused by COVID-19, four relief laws were enacted as of June 2020, including the CARES Act, in March 2020. These laws have appropriated $2.6 trillion across the government. Six areas—Paycheck Protection Program (PPP); Economic Stabilization and Assistance to Distressed Sectors; unemployment insurance; economic impact payments; Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund; and Coronavirus Relief Fund—account for 86 percent of the appropriations (see figure).

       

      Appropriations for COVID-19 Response from COVID-19 Relief Laws Enacted as of May 31, 2020

      Note: COVID-19 relief laws enacted as of May 31, 2020, include the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020, Pub. L. No. 116-123, 134 Stat. 146; Families First Coronavirus Response Act, Pub. L. No. 116-127, 134 Stat. 178 (2020); CARES Act, Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 281 (2020); and Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act, Pub. L. No. 116-139, 134 Stat. 620 (2020).  These amounts represent appropriation warrants issued as of May 31, 2020, by the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) to agencies in response to appropriations made by COVID-19 relief laws. A warrant is an official document issued upon enactment of an appropriation that establishes the amount of money authorized to be withdrawn from the Treasury. These amounts could increase in the future for programs with indefinite appropriations. In addition, this figure does not represent transfers of funds that agencies may make between accounts or transfers of funds they may make to other agencies, to the extent authorized by law.

      Total federal spending data are not readily available because, under Office of Management and Budget guidance, federal agencies are not directed to report COVID-19 related obligations (financial commitments) and expenditures until July 2020. It is unfortunate that the public will have waited more than 4 months since the enactment of the CARES Act for access to comprehensive obligation and expenditure information about the programs funded through these relief laws.

      In the absence of comprehensive data, GAO collected obligation and expenditure data from agencies, to the extent practicable, as of May 31, 2020. For the six largest spending areas, GAO found obligations totaled $1.3 trillion and expenditures totaled $643 billion. The majority of the difference was due to the PPP, for which the Small Business Administration (SBA) obligated $521 billion. The amounts for loan guarantees will not be considered expenditures until the loans are forgiven, and for those that are not forgiven, whether they are timely repaid.

      GAO also collected expenditure data on other programs affected by the federal response. For example, GAO also found that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has provided $7 billion in COVID-19 Medicaid funding related to a temporary increase in the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP), the statutory formula the federal government uses to match states’ Medicaid spending. Based on the information GAO collected, government-wide spending totals at least $677 billion, as of May 31, 2020.

      Given the sweeping and unfolding public health and economic crisis, agencies from across the federal government were called on for immediate assistance, requiring an unprecedented level of dedication and agility among the federal workforce, including those serving on the front lines to quickly establish services for those infected with the virus. Consistent with the urgency of responding to serious and widespread health issues and economic disruptions, agencies have given priority to moving swiftly where possible to distribute funds and implement new programs. As tradeoffs were made, however, agencies have made only limited progress so far in achieving transparency and accountability goals.

      GAO has identified several challenges related to the federal response to the crisis, as well as recommendations to help address these challenges, including the following:

      Viral testing. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported incomplete and inconsistent data from state and jurisdictional health departments on the amount of viral testing occurring nationwide, making it more difficult to track and know the number of infections, mitigate their effects, and inform decisions on reopening communities. However, HHS issued guidance on June 4, 2020, to laboratories that identifies required data elements to collect and how to report it to CDC. GAO will continue to examine activities related to COVID-19 testing.

      Distribution of supplies. The nationwide need for critical supplies to respond to COVID-19 quickly exceeded the quantity of supplies contained in the Strategic National Stockpile, which is designed to supplement state and local supplies during public health emergencies. HHS has worked with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Department of Defense (DOD) to increase the availability of supplies. However, federal, state, and local officials have expressed concerns about the distribution, acquisition, and adequacy of supplies. GAO will continue to examine these issues as well as the administration’s efforts to mitigate supply gaps.

      Paycheck Protection Program. As of June 12, 2020, the SBA had rapidly processed over $512 billion in 4.6 million guaranteed loans through private lenders to small businesses and other organizations adversely affected by COVID-19. As of May 31, 2020, SBA had expended about $2 billion in lender fees. SBA moved quickly to establish a new nationwide program, but the pace contributed to confusion and questions about the program and raised program integrity concerns. First, borrowers and lenders raised a number of questions about the program and eligibility criteria. To address these concerns, SBA and the Treasury issued a number of interim final rules and several versions of responses to frequently asked questions (see figure). However, questions and confusion remained. The Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act of 2020, enacted in June 2020, modified key program components. Second, to help quickly disburse funds, SBA allowed lenders to rely on borrower certifications to determine borrowers’ eligibility, raising the potential for fraud. GAO recommends that SBA develop and implement plans to identify and respond to risks in PPP to ensure program integrity, achieve program effectiveness, and address potential fraud. SBA neither agreed nor disagreed, but GAO believes implementation of its recommendation is essential.

      Timeline for Paycheck Protection Program, as of June 12, 2020

      Economic impact payments. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Treasury moved quickly to disburse 160.4 million payments worth $269.3 billion. The agencies faced difficulties delivering payments to some individuals, and faced additional risks related to making improper payments to ineligible individuals, such as decedents, and fraud. For example, according to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, as of April 30, 2020, almost 1.1 million payments totaling nearly $1.4 billion had gone to decedents. GAO recommends that IRS should consider cost-effective options for notifying ineligible recipients how to return payments. IRS agreed.

      Unemployment insurance (UI). States are implementing three new, federally funded UI programs created by the CARES Act and, as of May 2020, states have received more than 42 million UI claims. The Department of Labor (DOL) has taken steps to help states manage demand, but DOL is developing its approach to overseeing the new UI programs. GAO will be evaluating DOL’s monitoring efforts in future reports. Further, the UI program is generally intended to provide benefits to individuals who have lost their jobs; under PPP, employers are generally required to retain or rehire employees for full loan forgiveness. According to DOL, no mechanism currently exists that could capture information in real time about UI claimants who may receive wages paid from PPP loan proceeds. GAO recommends that DOL, in consultation with SBA and Treasury, immediately provide information to state unemployment agencies that specifically addresses PPP loans, and the risk of improper payments associated with these loans. DOL neither agreed nor disagreed with the recommendation, but noted it was planning forthcoming guidance.

      Contract obligations. Government-wide contract obligations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic totaled about $17 billion as of May 31, 2020. Goods procured include ventilators; services contracted for include vaccine development. In addition, the CARES Act provided $1 billion for Defense Production Act (DPA) purchases—$76 million of which, for example, was awarded to increase production of N95 respirators.

      GAO recommends Congress consider taking legislative action in the following areas:

      Aviation-preparedness plan. In 2015, GAO recommended that the Department of Transportation (DOT) work with federal partners to develop a national aviation-preparedness plan for communicable disease outbreaks. DOT agreed, but as of May 2020, it maintained that HHS and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) should lead the effort. Thus far, no plan exists. GAO recommends Congress take legislative action to require DOT to work with relevant agencies and stakeholders to develop a national aviation-preparedness plan to ensure safeguards are in place to limit the spread of communicable disease threats from abroad while at the same time minimizing any unnecessary interference with travel and trade.

      Full access to death data. The number of economic impact payments going to decedents highlights the importance of consistently using key safeguards in providing government assistance to individuals. IRS has access to the Social Security Administration’s full set of death records, but Treasury and its Bureau of the Fiscal Service, which distribute payments, do not. GAO recommends that Congress provide Treasury with access to the Social Security Administration’s full set of death records, and require that Treasury consistently use it, to help reduce similar types of improper payments.

      Medicaid. GAO previously found that during economic downturns—when Medicaid enrollment can rise and state economies weaken —the FMAP formula does not reflect current state economic conditions. GAO previously developed a formula that offers an option for providing temporary automatic, timely, and targeted assistance. GAO recommends Congress use this formula for any future changes to the FMAP during the current or any future economic downturn to help ensure that the federal funding is targeted and timely.

      Evolving lessons from the initial response highlight the importance of the following:

      • Establishing clear goals and defining roles and responsibilities for the wide range of federal agencies and other key players are critically important actions when preparing for pandemics and addressing an unforeseen emergency with a whole-of-government response.
      • Providing clear, consistent communication in the midst of a national emergency — among all levels of government, with health care providers, and to the public — is key.
      • Collecting and analyzing adequate and reliable data can inform decision-making and future preparedness — and allow for midcourse changes in response to early findings.
      • Establishing transparency and accountability mechanisms early on provides greater safeguards and reasonable assurance that federal funds reach the intended people, are used for the intended purposes, help ensure program integrity, and address fraud risks.

      Why GAO Did This Study

      The outbreak of COVID-19 quickly spread around the globe. As of June 17, 2020, the United States had over 2 million reported cases of COVID-19, and over 100,000 reported deaths, according to federal agencies. Parts of the nation have seen severely strained health care systems. Also, the country has experienced a significant and rapid downturn in the economy. Four relief laws, including the CARES Act, were enacted as of June 2020 to provide appropriations to address the public health and economic threats posed by COVID-19. In addition, the administration created the White House Coronavirus Task Force.

      The CARES Act includes a provision for GAO to report bimonthly on its ongoing monitoring and oversight efforts related to the COVID-19 pandemic. This initial report examines key actions the federal government has taken to address the COVID-19 pandemic and evolving lessons learned relevant to the nation’s response to pandemics, among other things.

      GAO reviewed data and documents from federal agencies about their activities and interviewed federal and state officials as well as industry representatives. GAO also reviewed available economic, health, and budgetary data.

       

  • United States Settles Disability Discrimination Case Involving Residents and Prospective Residents of a Senior Housing Community


    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Friday, June 26, 2020

    The United States announced yesterday that the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has approved a consent order resolving allegations that three defendants — Heritage Senior Living LLC; Westrum Hanover LP; and GAHC3 Bethlehem PA ILF LLC — violated the Fair Housing Act by discriminating against residents and prospective residents with disabilities at Traditions of Hanover (Traditions), a senior housing apartment complex in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.

    The lawsuit, which the United States filed on May 13, 2020, alleges that from at least 2005 to the present, defendants created and implemented a series of discriminatory tenant occupancy and eligibility policies and practices that discriminate against persons with disabilities, including requiring residents to sign a lease that imposes conditions such as requiring an initial physical assessment as a requirement of tenancy and potential eviction if a resident develops certain health conditions. In addition, Traditions maintained policies that required residents who use wheelchairs to transfer from their wheelchairs into a dining room chair and required residents who used motorized and non-motorized wheelchairs to pay a non-refundable deposit. In addition, the complaint alleges that the defendants provide transportation as an amenity and that until 2013, that transportation was inaccessible to people who used wheelchairs, in violation of the Fair Housing Act. 

    Under the consent order, defendants will pay a minimum of $250,000 and a maximum of $325,000 into a settlement fund to compensate residents and prospective residents who were harmed by these policies. Defendants will also pay a $55,000 civil penalty to the United States. In addition, defendants will appoint a Fair Housing Act compliance officer at Traditions and other senior living facilities, and will implement new resident policies, including a new reasonable accommodation policy and a new motorized wheelchair policy.

    “The Fair Housing Act protects the right of individuals with disabilities to enjoy a home to the same extent as everyone else. Common decency, our shared humanity, our nation’s commitment to justice, and our inalienable right to pursue happiness demands no less, and so does the law. Discriminating against people with disabilities is wrong and illegal, and the Justice Department will vigorously continue to enforce the Fair Housing Act to combat this unlawful conduct and obtain relief for its victims,” said Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband of the Civil Rights Division. “This consent order will ensure that all prospective and current residents at Traditions and other senior living facilities are treated equally and that victims of past discrimination receive compensation for the harms they have suffered.”

    “Seniors should not have to worry about losing their lease simply because they become disabled,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. “The Fair Housing Act protects them, and everyone, from discrimination in housing, and my office will continue to ensure that apartment buildings follow the law.”

    Individuals who are entitled to share in the settlement fund will be identified through a process established in the consent order.  Persons who believe that they or their family members were subjected to unlawful discrimination at Traditions should contact the Justice Department toll-free at 1-800-896-7743 mailbox #92 or e-mail the Justice Department at fairhousing@usdoj.gov.

    The federal Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability and familial status. More information about the Civil Rights Division and the laws it enforces is available at www.justice.gov/crt. Individuals who believe that they may have been victims of housing discrimination can call the Justice Department at 1-800-896-7743, e-mail the Justice Department at fairhousing@usdoj.gov, or contact the Department of Housing and Urban Development at 1-800-669-9777 or through its website at http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp.

  • Review of The Meanest Man in Congress: Jack Brooks and the Making of an American Century

    Meanest Man in CongressBy: Timothy McNulty and Brendan McNulty

    Published by: NewSouth Books, 2019, 556 pages; Montgomery, AL 

    Reviewed by Jo Freeman

    This is an authorized biography. Rep. Jack Brooks (D. TX), who served 42 years in the House of Representatives, wanted his story told. He spent many hours giving interviews before he died in 2012. His staff and family spent many more hours doing even more interviews.

     The two McNultys tell the story of “one of the most influential congressmen you’ve never heard of” — the long-time chair of the Government Operations and Judiciary Committees who was a close friend of fellow Texan Lyndon Baines Johnson. Brooks was called many names, among them “the meanest man in Congress.” The authors don’t say if that was the working title of their book before Brooks died, but it certainly commands attention.

    Like many politicians, he joined the military in World War II and then ran for public office when it ended. Always ambitious, he served in the state legislature while attending law school at the University of Texas. His goal was the US House of Representatives, to which he was elected in 1952. Most years, his challengers, if any, were in the Democratic primary because Texas was a one-party state. Over four decades Texas went from blue to red. Brooks was finally defeated in 1994 by a Republican (whom he had beaten only two years earlier).

    Although not its intent, this book is a fine description of how the political boys clubs worked. There were many boys’ clubs in Congress. The inner sanctum was known as the Board of Education. Most weekday evenings “Mr. Sam,” as Speaker Rayburn (D. TX) was called, invited a few Representatives to have a drink with him in a small Capitol room he used as a private office. There, they talked strategy and politics while imbibing. Liquor was the lubricant. The Board particularly flourished during Prohibition. During Brooks’ years it was men only as well as invitation only. There, the Speaker and party leaders tutored newer Members in the nuances of the House and decided which doors to open for whom. 

    With Mr. Sam as his mentor, Brooks moved up the hierarchy rather quickly,  becoming a subcommittee chairman after only two years in the House. This post was in the Government Operations Committee, which wasn’t the Committee he wanted when first sworn in. Sometimes being a protégé means doing what you are told, even if it’s not what you want, or what you think you want. Eventually he chaired the full Committee. In 1955 Mr. Sam appointed Brooks to the Judiciary Committee, which he did want. He would become its chairman in 1989. 

    For most of Brooks’ early years, Congress was heavily influenced by the “Texas gang,” led by Speaker Rayburn and Senate Majority Leader Lyndon Baines Johnson. Other Texans were part of their coterie. Brooks became the “gang leader” after Mr. Sam died in 1961 and LBJ became President in 1963. He was often asked to corral Texas Reps and get them to vote the way President Johnson wanted. In turn he and his wife (he married in December 1960 at age 38) regularly dined with the Johnsons.

    During these years Brooks used his subcommittee to investigate public expenditures, rooting out inefficiency and cronyism. While he certainly brought special projects and money to his district, he also protected the government and consumers in general from special interests. For example, he used government buying power to compel electric companies to increase the efficiency of light bulbs and computer manufacturers to adhere to common standards so new data processing machines could read each others data.

    Brooks got his way through manipulation, not domination. He was a team player. He did what his leadership wanted him to do even when he wasn’t happy about it (though he might try to find a way around their preferences). He also made enemies among some powerful interest groups who eventually found an opponent who could defeat him.

    Brooks’ 1994 defeat was timely. The Republicans captured Congress for the first time since 1955. If Brooks had kept his seat, he would have lost his Chairmanship and had to work with Newt Gingrich (R. GA), the new Republican Speaker, whom he despised. He also despised the polarization and personal enmity which developed in the House during the 1990s.

    This book is more than a biography. It gives you an inside look at how Congress operates, at least during the latter half of the 20th Century. You should get course credit in Political Science just for reading it.

    Copyright © 2020 Jo Freeman for SeniorWomen.com

    Jo is tweaking her new book Tell It Like It Is: Living History in the Southern Civil Rights Movement, 1965-66

  • New York Historical Society: Did “I Approve This Message” Live Up to its Promise? An Exhibition About the Emotional Impact of Political Advertising

    I Approve This Message, an exhibition about the emotional impact of political advertising in a landscape altered by the internet, was set to open at the New-York Historical Society this September.  The COVID-19 lockdown halted those plans, but [the NY Historical Society] wanted to share a few of the exhibition’s themes, particularly as we barrel towards our new date with destiny on election day, Nov. 3.

    In this second of three posts, [the Society] is going to look back at what was hoped to be a crucial turning point in political advertising — a new legal provision called Stand by Your Ad that was supposed to deliver more accountability and less deception and negativity. (Read the first post here.)

    You might think that TV ads don’t matter anymore — that they’re a quaint artifact made obsolete by Facebook and Google. But campaign budgets say differently: $6.7 billion is projected to be spent on advertising during the 2020 elections, including $4.9 billion on broadcast TV, cable, and radio ads. The presidential race alone between President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden is expected to account for $2.18 billion in ad spending.

    One of the familiar elements of these ads will be “I approve this message,” the straightforward affirmation from the candidates that is tacked onto the beginning or the end of every TV or radio commercial. This fixture of political advertising was first heard during 2004 due to a legal provision called Stand by Your Ad. Much has changed in politics over the last 15 years, but Stand by Your Ad remains standing. As the 2020 presidential election hits high gear, we look back at what it accomplished; what it didn’t; and what you need to know about political advertising in an ever more frenetic messaging world.

    Watch a compilation of presidential candidates “I approve this message”:

    When was the first time you heard a politician say “I approve this message” in their television ad?

    For most Americans, it was during the 2004 election, when the incumbent, President George W. Bush, a Republican, ran for reelection against Senator John Kerry, a Democrat. This message was the result of a new campaign finance law that included the Stand by Your Ad provision and required politicians to put their own personal stamp on their broadcast ads. While taken quite seriously at the time, it was also met with cynical fun and quickly became a punchline, a meme, and even a ringtone.

    What are the origins of Stand by Your Ad?

    In 2002, Senators John McCain, a Republican from Arizona, and Russ Feingold, a Democrat from Wisconsin, wanted to stem what they believed was the corrupting influence of money on the political process. They joined together to pass what became the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA, also known as McCain-Feingold) to ban the “soft money” being used in unlimited amounts during political campaigns.  (Spending laws around political advertising have since changed again and the battles continue.)

    McCain and Feingold also thought that by encouraging candidates running for federal office to explicitly “stand by” their TV and radio ads, the candidates would be less likely to run deceptive or negative messages. That belief resulted in the BCRA’s “Stand by Your Ad” provision, sponsored by Democratic Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon. After all, it seemed reasonable that the candidates who either didn’t tell the truth or who ran negative attack ads would alienate voters. This simple statement could provide at least some accountability.  Outside money, super PACS, and the internet, three of today’s biggest purveyors of misinformation, were not then a major factor.

    While controversial for Democrats and for Republicans, the vote to pass the BCRA was based upon principle, not party— “a rare example of politics working the way civics textbooks would have it—with legislators voting largely on the basis of conviction, not calculation,” to quote The Atlantic.

  • Cynthia Bailey, M.D.

     Dr. Cynthia Bailey

     

    Dr. Cynthia Bailey has practiced dermatology in California for over 30 years. She has done over 200,000 skin exams, specializing in general and surgical dermatology with an emphasis on skin cancer, adult skin problems and skin wellness. 

    Dr. Bailey’s interest in finding the best skin care products is both personal and professional. As a 60+ year old, very fair skinned native Californian she experienced sun damage in her 20s, seborrheic dermatitis in her 30s, rosacea and menopausal skin changes in her 40s. She utilizes skin care to control these skin problems and teaches patients and readers to do the same using scientifically backed products, ingredients and skin care routines.

    Prior to opening her private practice, Dr. Cynthia Bailey was on the full-time clinical teaching faculty at University of California San Diego Medical School. While there she also conducted laboratory research on the effect of sunlight on skin.

    Dr. Bailey graduated from Tulane University Medical School in New Orleans and received her bachelor’s degree from Mills College, a woman’s college in Northern California. She is a member of the following organizations: the American Academy of Dermatology, Diplomat of the American Board of Dermatology, the California Medical Association (member of the Board of Trustees 2000-2003, Member of the House of Delegates 1993-2003), Sonoma County Medical Association (President elect and President 1998-2000), Board of Trustees 1996-2000, Creator and Co-Chair of the Sonoma County Health Care Summit 2001-2003) and board of trustees and committee member on numerous Sonoma County health care organizations since 1991.

    Dr. Bailey is a wife, mother, grandmother, gardener, dog lover and lifelong ‘health nut’. She has been married for over 35 years and has two grown children. She and her husband have a small pinot noir vineyard and large organic vegetable garden in Sonoma County California. When not working or gardening, Dr. Bailey is usually doing some form of exercise: Pilates, yoga, dance, swimming, walking or bike riding.

    Previous Articles

    Hydrate Skin to Soothe ‘Winter Itch’

    Summer sun protection is much more than just picking the right sunscreen; Protecting your skin means physically keeping as much sun off your skin as possible when outdoors for long periods of time

    Dermatologist’s Tips, Restoring Soft Feet After Wearing Summer’s Sandals

    A Dermatologist’s Tips for Dry, Flaky Skin On the Scalp; It’s the Season for Seborrheic Dermatitis