Author: SeniorWomenWeb

  • Justice Department Releases Report on its Critical Incident Review of the Response to the Mass Shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas

    • The report, in both English and Spanish, as well as profiles of the victims and additional resources, is available on the COPS Office website at cops.usdoj.gov/uvalde.                                                                   
    • Español
    Thursday, January 18, 2024
    For Immediate Release
    Office of Public Affairs

    The Justice Department announced today the release of a report on its critical incident review of the law enforcement response to the tragic school shooting at Robb Elementary School. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland announced the review shortly after the tragedy on May 24, 2022, in which 19 children and two teachers died at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas. The report provides a thorough description of the critical incident review that has taken place over the past 20 months.

    The report is intended to provide the most comprehensive assessment available of the law enforcement response to the horrific incident on May 24, 2022, as well as the emergency medical response, communications, and trauma services in the wake of the tragedy. It begins with a minute-by-minute timeline reconstructing key events before, during, and immediately following the shooting. The report addresses many previously unanswered questions, builds on the existing knowledge base for responding to incidents of mass violence, and identifies generally accepted practices for effective law enforcement responses. In doing so, this report endeavors to honor the victims and survivors of this tragedy, as well as offer recommendations to improve future responses in other communities. 

    “The victims and survivors of the mass shooting at Robb Elementary School deserved better,” said Attorney General Garland. “The law enforcement response at Robb Elementary on May 24th, 2022 — and the response by officials in the hours and days after — was a failure. As a consequence of failed leadership, training, and policies, 33 students and three of their teachers — many of whom had been shot — were trapped in a room with an active shooter for over an hour as law enforcement officials remained outside. We hope to honor the victims and survivors by working together to try to prevent anything like this from happening again, here or anywhere.”

    “Uvalde is a community that is healing, and getting clear on the facts is part of healing,” said Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta. “As I made clear last April when I came to Uvalde to meet with families and reiterated to them last night, we promised that our report would honor the victims and survivors; provide a detailed, independent, and authoritative accounting of the events; and would not only look backward but would also identify lessons learned and recommendations for other communities to prevent something like this from happening again.”

    “The observations and recommendations in this report are based on national standards, generally accepted standards and practices, current research, and the expectations of communities,” said Director Hugh T. Clements, Jr. of the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office). “Reports like this are critical to law enforcement and, by extension, to the community. As agencies constantly strive to do better and be more fully prepared, detailed observations and recommendations like those within this report are invaluable to agencies planning for the future.”

    The report examines the multiple failures in the response to the tragedy, including the breakdowns in leadership, decision-making, tactics, policy, and training that contributed to those failures. It describes the responding officers’ most significant failure as not treating the incident throughout as an active shooter situation and using the available and sufficient resources and equipment to push forward immediately and continuously to eliminate the threat. Although several of the first officers on the scene initially acted consistent with generally accepted practices to try to engage the subject, once they retreated after being met with gunfire, the law enforcement responders began treating the incident as a barricaded subject scenario rather than as an active shooter situation. In all, there was a 77-minute gap between when officers first arrived on the scene and when they finally confronted and killed the subject.

    The report also examines the communications challenges during and after the shooting, including the inaccurate narrative that was initially delivered. It also documents the trauma and support services that were provided, as well as those that were not provided, to victims, survivors, family members, and responders.

    The critical incident review was led by the COPS Office, with the support of leading subject matter experts with a wide variety of relevant experience. The team established the following areas of focus: (1) incident timeline reconstruction; (2) tactics and equipment; (3) leadership, incident command, and coordination; (4) post-incident response and investigation; (5) public communications during and following the crisis; (6) trauma and support services; (7) school safety and security; and (8) pre-incident planning and preparation.

    The team collected and reviewed more than 14,000 pieces of data and documentation, including policies, training logs, body camera and CCTV video footage, audio recordings, photographs, personnel records, manuals and standard operating procedures, interview transcripts, investigative files and data, and other documents. The team also spent 54 days onsite in Uvalde and conducted over 260 interviews of individuals who either played a role or had important information related to areas of the review. Those interviews included personnel from the law enforcement agencies involved in the response to the mass shooting; other first responders and medical personnel; victims’ family members; victim services providers; communications professionals and public information officers; school personnel; elected and appointed government officials; survivors and other witnesses; and hospital staff. 

    The team took great care to be intentional about the words used in the report to convey the facts, observations, and recommendations. Nevertheless, the descriptions may be activating for some readers due to the explanations of this mass casualty incident, including the age of the victims. For resources, including free and confidential emotional support, please visit www.988lifeline.org or call or text 988 to reach the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year.

    Updated January 18, 2024
  • Women’s Congressional Policy Institute Weekly Legislative Update: Reproductive Health, Recruiting Families Using Data Act, the Supporting Pregnant and Parenting Women and Families Act

     

    Bringing women policymakers together across party lines to advance

    issues of importance to women and their families.

    Weekly Legislative Update

    January 16, 2024

    Bills Introduced: January 8-12, 2024

     

    Reproductive Health  

     

    H.R. 6918 –– Rep. Michelle Fishbach (R-MN)/Ways and Means (01/09/2024) –– A bill to prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from restricting funding for pregnancy centers. 

     

    Women’s History 

     

    S. 3570––Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV)/Environment and Public Works (01/10/2024)––A bill to designate the United States courthouse located at 500 West Pike Street in Clarksburg, West Virginia, as the “Irene M. Keeley United States Courthouse.”

     

    S. 3577––Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-NE)/Environment and Public Works (01/11/2024)––A bill to designate the federal building located at 300 E. Street in North Platte, Nebraska, as the “Virginia Smith Federal Building.”

     

    H.R. 6975––Rep. Alexander Mooney (R-WV)/Transportation and Infrastructure (01/11/2024)––A bill to designate the United States courthouse located at 500 West Pike Street in Clarksburg, West Virginia, as the “Irene M. Keeley United States Courthouse.” 

     

    H.R. 6984––Rep. Adrian Smith (R-NE)/Transportation and Infrastructure (01/11/2024)––A bill to designate the federal building located at 300 E. Street in North Platte, Nebraska, as the “Virginia Smith Federal Building.” 

     

     

    This Week: January 16-19, 2024

     

    Floor Action: The Senate and House are in session this week. 

     

    Appropriations- This week, the Senate and House may consider a laddered continuing resolution (CR) (as-yet-unnumbered) to extend most FY2023 spending bills to two dates in March. The CR extension to March 1 would include four spending bills: Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies; Energy and Water Development, and Related Agencies; Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies; and Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies. The extension to March 8 would include Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies; Defense; Financial Services and General Government; Homeland Security; Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies; Labor, Health and Human Services, Education; Legislative Branch; and State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs. 

     

    Adoption- On Tuesday, the House is scheduled to consider H.R. 3058, the Recruiting Families Using Data Act. 

     

    Education- On Thursday, the House is scheduled to consider H.R. 6914, the Pregnant Students’ Rights Act. 

     

    Reproductive Health- On Friday, the House is scheduled to consider H.R. 6918, the Supporting Pregnant and Parenting Women and Families Act.  

    Bills Introduced: January 8-12, 2024

     

    Reproductive Health  

     

    H.R. 6918––Rep. Michelle Fishbach (R-MN)/Ways and Means (01/09/2024)––A bill to prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from restricting funding for pregnancy centers. 

     

    Women’s History 

     

    S. 3570––Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV)/Environment and Public Works (01/10/2024)––A bill to designate the United States courthouse located at 500 West Pike Street in Clarksburg, West Virginia, as the “Irene M. Keeley United States Courthouse.”

     

    S. 3577––Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-NE)/Environment and Public Works (01/11/2024)––A bill to designate the federal building located at 300 E. Street in North Platte, Nebraska, as the “Virginia Smith Federal Building.”

     

    H.R. 6975––Rep. Alexander Mooney (R-WV)/Transportation and Infrastructure (01/11/2024)––A bill to designate the United States courthouse located at 500 West Pike Street in Clarksburg, West Virginia, as the “Irene M. Keeley United States Courthouse.” 

     

    H.R. 6984––Rep. Adrian Smith (R-NE)/Transportation and Infrastructure (01/11/2024)––A bill to designate the federal building located at 300 E. Street in North Platte, Nebraska, as the “Virginia Smith Federal Building.” 

     

     

    This Week: January 16-19, 2024

     

    Floor Action: The Senate and House are in session this week. 

     

    Appropriations- This week, the Senate and House may consider a laddered continuing resolution (CR) (as-yet-unnumbered) to extend most FY2023 spending bills to two dates in March. The CR extension to March 1 would include four spending bills: Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies; Energy and Water Development, and Related Agencies; Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies; and Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies. The extension to March 8 would include Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies; Defense; Financial Services and General Government; Homeland Security; Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies; Labor, Health and Human Services, Education; Legislative Branch; and State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs. 

     

    Adoption- On Tuesday, the House is scheduled to consider H.R. 3058, the Recruiting Families Using Data Act. 

     

    Education- On Thursday, the House is scheduled to consider H.R. 6914, the Pregnant Students’ Rights Act. 

     

    Reproductive Health- On Friday, the House is scheduled to consider H.R. 6918, the Supporting Pregnant and Parenting Women and Families Act.  

    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Instagram YouTube

    Our Contact Information
    Women’s Congressional Policy Institute
    409 12th Street, SW, Suite 702
    Washington, DC 20024
    (202) 554-2323
    http://www.wcpinst.org

    Unsubscribe | Manage email preferences

  • Jo Freeman Reviews The Sisterhood: The Secret History of Women at the CIA by Liza Mundy

     
    The Sisterhood: The Secret History of Women at the CIA                                                The Sisterhood: The Secret History of Women at the CIA
    by Liza Mundy 
    New York: Crown Publishing Group, a subsidiary of Penguin Random House
    xxii + 422 pages with color photo insert
    Hardcover: $32.50

    Women have worked at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) from its origins in World War II through the present.  Books have been written about the U.S.’s main foreign spy agency, but not from the perspective of women.  Expected to serve men, frequently shunted aside, given the tedious tasks that men did not want to do, Liza Mundy tells their story through career biographies of more than a dozen women who worked in the CIA over more than seventy years.  

    In order to uncover this largely unknown history Liza Mundy did dozens of interviews, as well as read oral histories, government documents and numerous publications to ferret out the facts.  The result is a fascinating story that reads much like a novel.  

    Initially, the story is depressingly familiar.  Young women interested in foreign affairs, often with excellent language skills, were recruited like men to serve their country with the expectation of doing exciting things.  Once hired, they were sent down the women’s path of lesser training, lower salaries and fewer opportunities.  

    Instead of going abroad as intelligence agents, women often worked in the windowless vaults of CIA headquarters in McLean VA, pulling records and reports from file cabinets to synthesize information. These “vault women” as they were known, often saw connections the men did not see. The trick was to persuade the men who made the decisions to understand things “out of the box.”  The men who saw those conclusions took the credit as though they had seen it all themselves.  

    Most women joined expecting to work outside the USA as field operatives.  Some managed to work their way out over time, especially those with superior language skills. But the best way to go abroad was to marry another CIA agent who was already a field operative. Ironically, as wives, they were quite successful at doing the things field operatives did without being noticed by the wrong parties. They were just women doing what women always did – shopping and taking care of household matters.

  • Hope: A Research-based Explainer by Naseem S. Miller, The Journalist’s Resource

    scrabble spelling of hope on a world map
    (Photo by Dayne Topkin on Unsplash)

    Research on hope has flourished only in recent decades. There’s now a growing recognition that hope has a role in physical, social, and mental health outcomes, including promoting resilience. As we embark on a challenging year of news, it’s important for journalists to learn about hope.

    So what is hope? And what does the research say about it?

    Merriam-Webster defines hope as a “desire accompanied by expectation of or belief in fulfillment.” This definition highlights the two basic dimensions of hope: a desire and a belief in the possibility of attaining that desire.

    Hope is not Pollyannaish optimism, writes psychologist Everett Worthington in a 2020 article for The Conversation. “Instead, hope is a motivation to persevere toward a goal or end state, even if we’re skeptical that a positive outcome is likely.”

    There are several scientific theories about hope.

    One of the first, and most well-known, theories on hope was introduced in 1991 by American psychologist Charles R. Snyder.

    In a paper published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Snyder defined hope as a cognitive trait centered on the pursuit of goals and built on two components: a sense of agency in achieving a goal, and a perceived ability to create pathways to achieve that goal. He defined hope as something individualistic.

    Snyder also introduced the Hope Scale, which continues to be used today, as a way to measure hope. He suggested that some people have higher levels of hope than others and there seem to be benefits to being more hopeful.

    “For example, we would expect that higher as compared with lower hope people are more likely to have a healthy lifestyle, to avoid life crises, and to cope better with stressors when they are encountered,” they write.

    Others have suggested broader definitions.

    In 1992, Kaye Herth, a professor of nursing and a scholar on hope, defined hope as “a multidimensional dynamic life force characterized by a confident yet uncertain expectation of achieving good, which to the hoping person, is realistically possible and personally significant.” Herth also developed the Herth Hope Index, which is used in various settings, including clinical practice and research.

    More recently, others have offered an even broader definition of hope.

    Anthony Scioli, a clinical psychologist and author of several books on hope, defines hope “as an emotion with spiritual dimensions,” in a 2023 review published in Current Opinion in Psychology. “Hope is best viewed as an ameliorating emotion, designed to fill the liminal space between need and reality.”

    Hope is also nuanced.

    “Our hopes may be active or passive, patient or critical, private or collective, grounded in the evidence or resolute in spite of it, socially conservative or socially transformative,” writes Darren Webb in a 2007 study published in History of the Human Sciences. “We all hope, but we experience this most human of all mental feelings in a variety of modes.”

    To be sure, a few studies have shown that hope can have negative outcomes in certain populations and situations. For example, one study highlighted in the research roundup below finds that Black college students who had higher levels of hope experienced more stress due to racial discrimination compared with Black students who had lower levels of hope.

    Today, hope is one of the most well-studied constructs within the field of positive psychology, according to the journal Current Opinion in Psychology, which dedicated its August 2023 issue to the subject. (Positive psychology is a branch of psychology focused on characters and behaviors that allow people to flourish.)

    We’ve gathered several studies below to help you think more deeply about hope and recognize its role in your everyday lives.

    Research roundup

    The Role of Hope in Subsequent Health and Well-Being For Older Adults: An Outcome-Wide Longitudinal Approach
    Katelyn N.G. Long, et al. Global Epidemiology, November 2020.

    The study: To explore the potential public health implications of hope, researchers examine the relationship between hope and physical, behavioral and psychosocial outcomes in 12,998 older adults in the U.S. with a mean age of 66.

    Researchers note that most investigations on hope have focused on psychological and social well-being outcomes and less attention has been paid to its impact on physical and behavioral health, particularly among older adults.

    The findings: Results show a positive association between an increased sense of hope and a variety of behavioral and psychosocial outcomes, such as fewer sleep problems, more physical activity, optimism and satisfaction with life. However, there wasn’t a clear association between hope and all physical health outcomes. For instance, hope was associated with a reduced number of chronic conditions, but not with stroke, diabetes and hypertension.

    The takeaway: “The later stages of life are often defined by loss: the loss of health, loved ones, social support networks, independence, and (eventually) loss of life itself,” the authors write. “Our results suggest that standard public health promotion activities, which often focus solely on physical health, might be expanded to include a wider range of factors that may lead to gains in hope. For example, alongside community-based health and nutrition programs aimed at reducing chronic conditions like hypertension, programs that help strengthen marital relations (e.g., closeness with a spouse), provide opportunities to volunteer, help lower anxiety, or increase connection with friends may potentially increase levels of hope, which in turn, may improve levels of health and well-being in a variety of domains.”

    Associated Factors of Hope in Cancer Patients During Treatment: A Systematic Literature Review
    Corine Nierop-van Baalen, Maria Grypdonck, Ann van Hecke and Sofie Verhaeghe. Journal of Advanced Nursing, March 2020.

    The study: The authors review 33 studies, written in English or Dutch and published in the past decade, on the relationship between hope and the quality of life and well-being of patients with cancer. Studies have shown that many cancer patients respond to their diagnosis by nurturing hope, while many health professionals feel uneasy when patients’ hopes go far beyond their prognosis, the authors write.

    The findings: Quality of life, social support and spiritual well-being were positively associated with hope, as measured with various scales. Whereas symptoms, psychological distress and depression had a negative association with hope. Hope didn’t seem to be affected by the type or stage of cancer or the patient’s demographics.

    The takeaway: “Hope seems to be a process that is determined by a person’s inner being rather than influenced from the outside,” the authors write. “These factors are typically given meaning by the patients themselves. Social support, for example, is not about how many patients experience support, but that this support has real meaning for them.”

    Characterizing Hope: An Interdisciplinary Overview of the Characteristics of Hope
    Emma Pleeging, Job van Exel and Martijn Burger. Applied Research in Quality of Life, September 2021.

    The study: This systematic review provides an overview of the concept of hope based on 66 academic papers in ten academic fields, including economics and business studies, environmental studies, health studies, history, humanities, philosophy, political science, psychology, social science, theology and youth studies, resulting in seven themes and 41 sub-themes.

    The findings: The authors boil down their findings to seven components: internal and external sources, the individual and social experience of hope, internal and external effects, and the object of hope, which can be “just about anything we can imagine,” the authors write.

    The takeaway: “An important implication of these results lies in the way hope is measured in applied and scientific research,” researchers write. “When measuring hope or developing instruments to measure it, researchers could be well-advised to take note of the broader understanding of the topic, to prevent that important characteristics might be overlooked.”

    Revisiting the Paradox of Hope: The Role of Discrimination Among First-Year Black College Students
    Ryon C. McDermott, et al. Journal of Counseling Psychology, March 2020.

    The study: Researchers examine the moderating effects of hope on the association between experiencing racial discrimination, stress and academic well-being among 203 first-year U.S. Black college students. They build on a small body of evidence that suggests high levels of hope might have a negative effect on Black college students who experience racial discrimination.

    The authors use data gathered as part of an annual paper-and-pencil survey of first-year college students at a university on the Gulf Coast, which the study doesn’t identify.

    The findings: Researchers find that Black students who had higher levels of hope experienced more stress due to racial discrimination compared with students who had lower levels of hope. On the other hand, Black students with low levels of hope may be less likely to experience stress when they encounter discrimination.

    Meanwhile, Black students who had high levels of hope were more successful in academic integration — which researchers define as satisfaction with and integration into the academic aspects of college life — despite facing discrimination. But low levels of hope had a negative impact on students’ academic well-being.

    “The present study found evidence that a core construct in positive psychology, hope, may not always protect Black students from experiencing the psychological sting of discrimination, but it was still beneficial to their academic well-being,” the authors write.

    The takeaway: “Our findings also highlight an urgent need to reduce discrimination on college campuses,” the researchers write. “Reducing discrimination could help Black students (and other racial minorities) avoid additional stress, as well as help them realize the full psychological and academic benefits of having high levels of hope.”

  • 2024 Tax Filing Season Set for January 29; IRS Continues to Make Improvements to Help Taxpayers

    Here you’ll find items of current interest — new programs, recent guidance or timely reminders.

    Tax Updates and News From the IRS

    Taxpayers face a number of issues due to critical tax law changes that took place in 2022 and ongoing challenges related to the pandemic. We continue to share updated information for people preparing to file their 2022 tax returns, as well as anyone who has previous year tax returns awaiting processing by the IRS.

    The Tax Updates and News From the IRS page is designed to help anyone whether they are now preparing their tax return or are awaiting processing of a return or refund and the latest updates on IRS letters, or notices. Newer updates will be placed at the top of that page; the IRS will also provide critical updates through social media.

    IRS ends most unannounced home visits

    The IRS announced a major policy change that will end unannounced visits to taxpayers by agency revenue officers to reduce public confusion and increase overall safety. The change reverses a decades-long practice by IRS Revenue Officers, the unarmed agency employees whose duties included visiting households and businesses to collect unpaid taxes. Effective immediately, the unscheduled visits will end except in a few unique circumstances.

    Check the status of your refund

    Taxpayers can track their refund easily and conveniently with the IRS Where’s My Refund? tool at IRS.gov/refunds and with the IRS2Go app.

    Refund status is available within 24 hours of the IRS letting the taxpayer know that they got the e-filed return. The tool also gives the taxpayer a personalized refund date after the IRS processes the return and approves the refund.

    Inflation Reduction Act Strategic Operating Plan

    The IRS unveiled its Strategic Operating Plan, an ambitious effort to transform the tax agency and dramatically improve service to taxpayers and the nation during the next decade. The report outlines the agency’s historic plans to make fundamental changes following funding from last year’s Inflation Reduction Act.

    Tax Relief in Disaster Situations

    Special tax law provisions may help taxpayers and businesses recover financially from the impact of a disaster, especially when the federal government declares their location to be a major disaster area. The IRS may also grant additional time to file returns and pay taxes.

    To find the most recent tax relief provisions for taxpayers affected by disaster situations, visit the Tax Relief in Disaster Situations page.

    Inflation Reduction Act of 2022

    The IRS is working on implementing the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. This major legislation will affect individuals, businesses, and tax exempt and government entities.

    The Inflation Reduction Act changed a wide range of tax laws and provided funds to improve our services and technology to make tax filing easier for you.

    Coronavirus Tax Relief

    For the latest information about coronavirus tax relief, see the Coronavirus Tax Relief and Economic Impact Payments page.

    Visit our Coronavirus and Economic Impact Payments: Resources and Guidance page for our latest content including news releases, Tax Tips, frequently asked questions, multilingual partner materials and more.

    To learn about IRS operations during COVID-19, visit our operations page for up-to-date status on affected IRS operations and services.

    Outreach Connection

    Get free tax content to share with your staff, clients, customers or colleagues that you can include in your:

    • Website
    • e-Newsletter
    • Twitter, Instagram or other social media

    Tax Withholding

    The IRS encourages taxpayers to perform a quick “paycheck checkup” by using the Withholding Estimator to check if they have the right amount of withholding for their personal situation.

    Consumer Alerts on Tax Scams

    ‪Note that the IRS will never:

    • Call to demand immediate payment using a specific payment method such as a prepaid debit card, gift card or wire transfer. Generally, the IRS will first mail you a bill if you owe any taxes.
    • Threaten to immediately bring in local police or other law-enforcement groups to have you arrested for not paying.
    • Demand that you pay taxes without giving you the opportunity to question or appeal the amount they say you owe.
    • Ask for credit or debit card numbers over the phone.

    For more information on tax scams, please see Tax Scams/Consumer Alerts. For more information on phishing scams, please see Suspicious emails and Identity Theft.

    Call the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)

     
  • A Proclamation on National Stalking Awareness Month, 2024 From Joseph R. Biden Jr.

         During National Stalking Awareness Month, we honor the strength and resilience of the millions of people across this country who have endured stalking.  We reaffirm our commitment to building a future where everyone can live free from fear, threats, and abuse. 

         Stalking at its core is an abuse of power.  It affects one in three women and one in six men in their lifetimes.  It can happen in person or online; it can be committed by a stranger or someone you know.  The fear it sparks can be all-consuming, shattering one’s sense of security, safety, and certainty.  It can threaten loved ones and even force victims to uproot their lives and move at a moment’s notice.  It is wrong.   

         One of my proudest achievements in life was writing and championing the landmark Violence Against Women Act some 30 years ago in the United States Senate.  It began to change our culture, bringing these crimes out of the shadows and getting survivors the services and support they needed.  Over the years, I worked with courageous advocates to keep expanding protections and boosting access to healing and justice.  In 2022, I was proud to sign a reauthorization of the law, increasing investment in prosecution, prevention, and support for survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking.  The new law also creates a Federal civil cause of action for the non-consensual distribution of intimate images and expands the jurisdiction of Tribal courts to prosecute non-Native American perpetrators of stalking, sexual assault, child abuse, and sex trafficking.

         At the same time, we are working to make sure our response keeps pace with technology and protects all Americans from online harassment and cybercrime.  In 2022, I created the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse to help stop technology-facilitated gender-based violence.  It aims to find new ways to boost accountability, support survivors, and further research the threat.  Survivors, parents, educators, advocates, medical and legal professionals, and others have shared their expertise with the task force, which will help inform their work.

         This past May, I also released America’s first-ever National Plan to End Gender-Based Violence, which tackles the issue on seven fronts — prevention, healing, housing, online safety, the justice system, crisis response, and data.  Since the beginning of my Administration, the Department of Justice’s Office on Violence Against Women has provided grants to law enforcement, prosecutors, courts, and community organizations to work together to stop stalking and other gender-based crimes. The Department of Housing and Urban Development has provided tens of thousands of emergency housing vouchers to help stalking victims and others find a safe place to rebuild their lives.

         Too often, stalking happens in the shadows, hidden from the view of others.  This month, we shine a harsh light on these crimes to make clear that this kind of harassment, threat, or unwanted aggressive attention has no place in America.  There is so much at stake.  Every American deserves to feel safe and protected, have a little peace of mind, and live with dignity and respect.

         NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim January 2024 as National Stalking Awareness Month.  I call on all Americans to speak out against stalking and to support the efforts of advocates, courts, service providers, and law enforcement to help those who are targeted and send the message to perpetrators that these crimes will not go unpunished.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-ninth day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-three, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-eighth.
     

                                   JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR.

  • Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Question: Design and the Gender Gap in Financial Literacy

    January 02, 2024

    Question design and the gender gap in financial literacy

    Anna TranfagliaAlicia Lloro, and Ellen Merry

    Many surveys have measured people’s financial literacy with a standard set of questions covering interest, inflation, and investment diversification. Results from these surveys have consistently shown that women are less likely than men to answer the financial literacy questions correctly – the so-called financial literacy gender gap.

    These standard financial literacy questions are typically administered with an explicit “don’t know” answer choice. Women are much more likely than men to select “don’t know,” and this fact largely drives the financial literacy gender gap; men and women generally select incorrect responses at similar rates. If women tend to select “don’t know” for reasons unrelated to financial literacy, such as confidence, then the observed financial literacy gender gap may reflect both differences in knowledge as well as other factors. One reason this gender gap matters is that financial literacy is predictive of many financial behaviors like saving for retirement, having three months of liquid savings, and holding stocks and bonds (Bhutta, Blair, and Dettling, 2021; Hogarth and Hilbert, 2002; Lusardi and Mitchell, 2011; Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 2022).

    In this note, we leverage a survey experiment in the 2021 Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (SHED) to explore the extent to which women’s greater propensity to respond “don’t know” contributes to the gender gap in financial literacy. We find that the gender gap in financial literacy shrinks when the “don’t know” option is removed. Constructing a counterfactual of what we might expect if people who answered “don’t know” guessed the answer to the question instead, we find that for both men and women, removing the “don’t know” option increases the share of correct responses beyond what we predict would occur if people were simply guessing. Additionally, removing the “don’t know” option increases the share correct by more for women than for men and shrinks the observed financial literacy gap.

    SHED Experiment

    Since 2013, the SHED has been conducted annually each fall to measure the economic well-being of U.S. households. The 2021 SHED had over 11,000 respondents and included the following three standard financial literacy questions from Lusardi and Mitchell (2008) that have been included on numerous other surveys to measure financial literacy (correct answer in bold):

    • (Interest) Suppose you had $100 in a savings account and the interest rate was 2% per year. After 5 years, how much do you think you would have in the account if you left the money to grow?
      Answers: More than $102, Exactly $102, Less than $102, [Don’t know]
    • (Inflation) Imagine that the interest rate on your savings account was 1% per year and inflation was 2% per year. After 1 year, how much would you be able to buy with the money in this account?
      Answers: More than today, Exactly the same, Less than today, [Don’t know]
    • (Diversification) Do you think the following statement is true or false? “Buying a single company’s stock usually provides a safer return than a stock market mutual fund.”
      Answers: True, False, [Don’t know]

    Typically, the questions are administered with an explicit “don’t know” response included in the set of possible answers. In the 2021 SHED, however, whether a respondent received a “don’t know” answer choice for the three financial literacy questions was randomly determined. As a result, approximately half of the respondents in the 2021 SHED (n = 5,925) received the three financial literacy questions with an explicit “don’t know” response option, and the remaining respondents (n = 5,949) received the questions without the “don’t know” option.

    This experiment builds on previous work from Bucher-Koenen et al. (2021) who examined a similar experiment conducted on the De Nederlandsche Bank Household Survey (DHS) – a panel survey of the Dutch central bank that is representative of the Dutch speaking population in the Netherlands. However, these experiments differ in that our experiment gives the two versions of the questions (with and without “don’t know”) to two different groups of respondents on the same survey, while their experiment gives the two versions of the questions to the same group of respondents twice, 6 weeks apart.

  • Source: National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases; CDC Continues to Track the Growth of JN.1 December 22, 2023

    Last Reviewed: December 22, 2023, 11:00 AM EDT
     

    CDC is posting updates on respiratory viruses every week; for the latest information, please visit CDC Respiratory Virus Updates.

     

    JN.1 continues to increase in proportion

    CDC has been tracking JN.1 for months, since it first split from its parent, BA.2.86. JN.1 is similar to BA.2.86 but has an additional mutation (L455S) in the spike protein. JN.1 continues to cause an increasing share of infections and is now the most widely circulating variant in the United States. For the two weeks ending on December 23, 2023, JN.1 is expected to account for 39-50% of all SARS-CoV-2 variants. That’s an increase from the projected prevalence two weeks ago of 15-29%. We’re also seeing an increasing share of infections caused by JN.1 in travelers, wastewater, and most regions around the globe.

    JN.1’s continued growth suggests that the variant is either more transmissible or better at evading our immune systems than other circulating variants. It is too early to know whether or to what extent JN.1 will cause an increase in infections or hospitalizations.

    It’s important to know that existing vaccines, tests, and treatments still work well against JN.1, so this variant does not affect CDC’s recommendations. Recent laboratory data (here and here) show that the updated 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccines produce antibodies that protect against JN.1, further indicating that our vaccines work well against this variant. At this time, the spread of JN.1 does not appear to pose additional risks to public health beyond that of other recent variants. CDC is closely monitoring COVID-19 increases domestically and internationally and will communicate if the situation changes.

    Regardless of JN.1, we are seeing increasing COVID-19 activity this fall and winter season as we have in prior years. COVID-19 activity is elevated and increasing (though not dramatically) in the United States, as measured by emergency department visitstest positivitywastewater levels, and hospitalizations. It’s a good time to take extra precautions to protect yourself and others, especially while other respiratory diseases including influenza are also on the rise.

    Read more about JN.1

    Take steps to protect yourself against JN.1 and other circulating variants

    The spread of JN.1 does not alter CDC’s COVID-19 recommendations. COVID-19 remains a serious public health threat, especially for people at higher risk of severe disease, such as older adults, infants, and people with certain disabilities and underlying health conditions. We encourage you to take steps to protect yourself and others.

    These actions can help protect you and your loved ones against the most severe effects of COVID-19

    • Get your updated COVID-19 vaccine.
    • Test if you develop respiratory symptoms or are exposed to someone who has COVID-19.
    • Talk to a healthcare provider about treatment if you test positive and are at higher risk for severe effects of COVID-19.
    • Help reduce the spread of COVID-19.
      • Improving your indoor air is one of the best ways to prevent spread. This can be as simple as using a portable air cleaner or opening windows (for those with pleasant winter weather). And if your home thermostat offers a FAN option, turn it from AUTO to ON when you have visitors to keep air running continuously.
      • Learn more about other ways to help reduce spread, including testing for COVID-19, wearing masks, and increasing space and distancing.
     
  • leafless tree

    Ferida Wolff’s Backyard: Shifting Seasons: We Need to Remember That We Are Strong Underneath, That Things Change and That the World is Flexible.

    leafless tree

    Shifting Seasons

    I was moved when I looked at the leafless tree. It seemed to be reaching up to embrace the sky.

    It will be like that through the winter months, allowing us to see its inner strength before it covers its bareness with beautiful greenery in Spring. 

    It reminded me of our hopes that seem so barren in troublesome times, like the world is going through right now.

    We need to remember that we are strong underneath, that things change and that the world is flexible.

    If we can hold onto the understanding that life often shifts like the seasons, perhaps the beauty of humanity will come back into season. 

    Ferida’s Backyard

    As our communities become more urbanized, the natural features around us tend to get pushed into the background and often go unnoticed. In “Ferida’s Backyard,” I look at the details of nature locally, from a neighborhood perspective, frequently from a backyard vantage point. It excites me to share what I see.

    An awareness of the natural connection can beautifully enhance our lives.     

    From the Editor, Elle Decor Quotes List About the New Year:

    https://www.elledecor.com/life-culture/entertaining/news/g3414/new-year-quotes/

  • IRS Reminds Those Aged 73 and Older to Make Required Withdrawals From IRAs and Retirement Plans by Dec. 31

    Issue Number:    IR-2023-246IRL


    IRS reminds those aged 73 and older to make required withdrawals from IRAs and retirement plans by Dec. 31; notes changes in the law for 2023

    WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service today reminded people born before 1951 of the year-end deadlines to take required minimum distributions (RMDs) from funds held in individual retirement arrangements (IRAs) and other retirement plans, and noted new requirements under the law beginning in 2023.

    Required minimum distributions, or RMDs, are amounts that many retirement plan and IRA account owners must withdraw each year. RMDs are taxable income and may be subject to penalties if not timely taken. For individuals born before 1951, RMDs from IRAs and retirement plans should, for the most part, already have begun and are required for 2023.

    New for 2023: The Secure 2.0 Act raised the age that account owners must begin taking RMDs. For 2023, the age at which account owners must start taking required minimum distributions goes up from age 72 to age 73, so individuals born in 1951 must receive their first required minimum distribution by April 1, 2025.

    See Retirement Plan and IRA Required Minimum Distributions FAQs for more detailed information regarding the new provisions in the law.

    IRAs: The RMD rules require individuals to take withdrawals from their IRAs (including SIMPLE IRAs and SEP IRAs) every year once they reach age 72 (73 if the account owner reaches age 72 in 2023 or later), even if they’re still employed.

    Owners of Roth IRAs are not required to take withdrawals during their lifetime. However, after the death of the account owner, beneficiaries of a Roth IRA are subject to the RMD rules.

    Retirement plans: The RMD rules also apply to employer-sponsored retirement plans, including profit-sharing plans, 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans and 457(b) plans. Participants in employer-sponsored retirement plans can delay taking their RMDs until they retire, unless they are a 5% owner of the business sponsoring the plan.

    Designated Roth accounts in a 401(k) or 403(b) plan are subject to the RMD rules for 2023. Beginning in 2024, designated Roth accounts will not be subject to the RMD rules while the account owner is still alive.

    The RMD Comparison Chart highlights several of the basic RMD rules that apply to IRAs and defined contribution plans.

    RMD calculations and tax on missed distributions

    An IRA trustee or plan administrator must either report the amount of the RMD to the IRA owner or offer to calculate it. An IRA owner or trustee must calculate the RMD separately for each IRA owned, but the owner can make withdrawals from the account(s) of their choice as long as the total equals or exceeds the total annual requirement. Although the IRA trustee or plan administrator may calculate the RMD, the account owner is ultimately responsible for taking the correct RMD amount.

    If an account owner fails to withdraw the full amount of the RMD by the due date, the owner is subject to an excise tax equal to 25% of the amount not withdrawn for 2023 and later years. The SECURE 2.0 Act dropped the excise tax rate from 50% for distributions required for 2023 and reduces the tax rate to 10% if the error is corrected within two years. The account owner should file Form 5329, Additional Taxes on Qualified Plans (Including IRAs) and Other Tax-Favored Accounts, with their federal tax return for the year in which the full amount of the RMD was required but not taken.

    The IRS has worksheets to calculate the RMD and payout periods.