Author: SeniorWomenWeb

  • Prenatal Exposure to Organophosphate Pesticides and IQ Deficits in School-Age Children

    Source: Environmental Health Perspectives (NIEHS)

    Three independent investigations published in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) have reached similar conclusions, associating prenatal exposure to organophosphate (OP) pesticides with IQ deficits in school-age children. The fact that three research groups reached such similar conclusions independently adds considerable support to the validity of the findings.

    The three studies were conducted at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health; the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University; and Mount Sinai School of Medicine. All three involved cohorts of women enrolled during pregnancy. The Berkeley and Mount Sinai investigators measured OP pesticide metabolites in the pregnant women’s urine, while the Columbia investigators measured the OP pesticide chlorpyrifos in umbilical cord blood. Intelligence tests were administered to children of these mothers between ages 6 and 9 years at Mount Sinai and at age 7 years at Berkeley and Columbia.

    Although the study findings are not directly comparable, all three investigations found evidence linking prenatal OP pesticide exposures with adverse effects on cognitive function that continued into early childhood.

    “It is well known that findings from individual epidemiologic studies may be influenced by chance and other sources of error. This is why researchers often recommend their results be interpreted with caution until they are supported by similar findings in other study populations,” said EHP Editor-in-Chief Hugh A. Tilson. “As a group, these papers add substantial weight to the evidence linking OP pesticides with adverse effects on cognitive development by simultaneously reporting consistent findings for three different groups of children.”

    The three articles is available online April 21, free of charge.

    Prenatal Exposure to Organophosphates, Paraoxonase 1, and Cognitive Development in Childhood is available at http://ehponline.org/article/info:doi/10.1289/ehp.1003183.

    Prenatal Exposure to Organophosphate Pesticides and IQ in 7-Year-Old Children is available at http://ehponline.org/article/info:doi/10.1289/ehp.1003185.

    7-Year Neurodevelopmental Scores and Prenatal Exposure to Chlorpyrifos, a Common Agricultural Pesticide is available at http://ehponline.org/article/info:doi/10.1289/ehp.1003160.

    EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services. EHP is an open-access journal, and all content is available free online at http://www.ehponline.org/.

  • Van Cleef & Arpels Haute Jewelry Show at the Cooper-Hewitt Extended

    By Val CastronovoGoddess Head Brooch

    The dazzling exhibition, Set in Style: The Jewelry of Van Cleef & Arpels, will extend its run through Monday, July 4, the Smithsonian’s Cooper-Hewitt design museum announced last week. And with good reason: more than 45,000 visitors have clocked in since the show’s opening in February, and on a recent afternoon pilgrimage the crowd showed no sign of abating.

    Well-heeled, Upper East Side ladies mingled with schoolboys in jeans and T-shirts, all eyeing precious jewels encased in glass bubbles at the Carnegie mansion on East 91st Street in Manhattan. Indeed, the setting rivaled the show’s featured works in the shock and awe department.

    The exhibit, billed as “the most comprehensive ever organized of Van Cleef & Arpels masterworks,” features 350 items drawn from the collection of the famed Parisian jeweler and its international clientele. There are highly stylized necklaces, bracelets, rings, earrings, brooches and watches, in addition to finely crafted accessories like clutches, cigarette cases and tobacco lighters. Objets d’art, such as a 1908 butler’s bell push comprised of a model yacht riding a wave fashioned from jasper, drew audible gasps from the crowd.1908 butler's bell push

    The curators aim to explore the 105-year-old firm’s mark on 20th century design and design innovation, with an emphasis on the American market. “This is the first exhibition to approach the work of Van Cleef & Arpels from the perspective of a design museum and focus on the establishment of the design house in New York and the role of American style and taste,” says Bill Moggridge, director of the Cooper-Hewitt. The firm was an exhibitor at the 1939 World’s Fair in New York and opened shop at Rockefeller Center after the fair closed.

    Photos of American style-setters bedecked in precious VC&A gems — picture First Lady Jackie Kennedy, Princess Grace of Monaco (Grace Kelly), the Duchess of Windsor (Wallis Simpson), and Elizabeth Taylor — line one wall of a gallery, with the real thing on display directly across the room. Princess Grace’s tiara and diamond-and-pearl engagement set — a ring, necklace, bracelet and earrings — are prominently featured. As jewelry historian Ruth Peltason writes in the exhibition’s sumptuously Image from Amazon
    illustrated catalog (Set in Style: The Jewelry of Van Cleef & Arpels by Sarah Coffin, Suzy Menkes, Ruth Peltason), “Icy diamonds offset the creamy sensuous pearls, a natural pairing for a young bride and an apt symbol for a woman Alfred Hitchcock described as ‘a snow-covered volcano.’”

    Innovation, a central theme of the show, is perhaps best represented by the so-called “Mystery Setting,” a technique pioneered by VC&A jewelers in which, as the curators explain, the setting of a piece “does not show between the stones, creating a solid field of color.” A video in the show’s first room painstakingly details the process. Matching stones are cut to fit curved surfaces and placed in channels so the setting is hidden.

  • Bills Introduced: Crime, Employment, Health, Violence Against Women

    interior of Capitol dome

    Women’s Policy Inc, lists some of the Congressional Bills introduced last week in the US House and Senate; they also noted the House voting to eliminate funding for Preventive Health Fund.

    Crime

    H.R. 1523 — Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY)/Judiciary (4/13/11) — A bill to provide for Debbie Smith grants for auditing sexual assault evidence backlogs and to establish a Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence Registry, and for other purposes.

    Employment

    S. 788 — Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA)/Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (4/12/11) — A bill to prohibit discrimination in the payment of wages on account of sex, race, or national origin, and for other purposes.

    S. 797 — Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)/Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (4/12/11) — A bill to provide more effective remedies to victims of discrimination in the payment of wages on the basis of sex, and for other purposes.

    H.R. 1493 — Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC)/Education and the Workforce (4/12/11) — A bill to prohibit discrimination in the payment of wages on account of sex, race, or national origin, and for other purposes.

    H.R. 1519 — Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT)/Education and the Workforce (4/13/11) — A bill to provide more effective remedies to victims of discrimination in the payment of wages on the basis of sex, and for other purposes.

    S. 859 — Sen. Robert Casey (D-PA)/Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (4/14/11) — A bill to prohibit sexual harassment by individuals administering programs and activities receiving federal assistance.

    Health

    S. 795 — Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)/Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (4/12/11) — A bill to address HIV/AIDS in the African-American community, and for other purposes.

    S. 814 — Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV)/Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (4/13/11) — A bill to require the public disclosure of audits conducted with respect to entities receiving funds under title X of the Public Health Service Act.

    S. Res. 144 — Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX)/Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (4/13/11) — A resolution supporting early detection for breast cancer.

    H. Res. 234 — Rep. Sue Myrick (R-NC)/Energy and Commerce (4/15/11) — A resolution recognizing the importance of breast cancer early detection efforts.

    International

    H. Res. 217 — Rep. Jo Ann Emerson (R-MO)/Foreign Affairs, Agriculture (4/11/11) — A resolution supporting the goals and ideals of Global Child Nutrition Month.

    Military/Violence Against Women

  • The Wall Street Money Machine: ProPublica’s Pulitzer

    ProPublica reporters Jesse Eisinger and Jake Bernstein have been awarded a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting for their stories on how some Wall Street bankers, seeking to enrich themselves at the expense of their clients and sometimes even their own firms, at first delayed but then worsened the financial crisis. More »

    As the housing market started to fade, bankers and hedge funds scrambled for ways to maintain the lavish bonuses and profits they had become so accustomed to, repackaging mortgages in complex securities called collateralized debt obligations. The booming CDO market masked how weak the housing market was, and exacerbated its collapse. Below is the first of the articles in the series:

    The Magnetar Trade: How One Hedge Fund Helped Keep the Bubble Going

    Update Oct. 29th, 2010: This story has been corrected in response to a recent letter from Magnetar. Read their letter, along with our response [1].

    In late 2005, the booming US housing market seemed to be slowing. The Federal Reserve had begun raising interest rates. Subprime mortgage company shares were falling. Investors began to balk at buying complex mortgage securities. The housing bubble, which had propelled a historic growth in home prices, seemed poised to deflate. And if it had, the great financial crisis of 2008, which produced the Great Recession of 2008 — 09, might have come sooner and been less severe.

    At just that moment, a few savvy financial engineers at a suburban Chicago hedge fund [2] helped revive the Wall Street money machine, spawning billions of dollars of securities ultimately backed by home mortgages.

    When the crash came, nearly all of these securities became worthless, a loss of an estimated $40 billion paid by investors, the investment banks who helped bring them into the world, and, eventually, American taxpayers.

    Yet the hedge fund, named Magnetar for the super-magnetic field created by the last moments of a dying star, earned outsized returns in the year the financial crisis began.

    How Magnetar pulled this off is one of the untold stories of the meltdown. Only a small group of Wall Street insiders was privy to what became known as the Magnetar Trade [4]. Nearly all of those approached by ProPublica declined to talk on the record, fearing their careers would be hurt if they spoke publicly. But interviews with participants, e-mails [5], thousands of pages of documents and details about the securities that until now have not been publicly disclosed shed light on an arcane, secretive corner of Wall Street.

  • Reproductive Health: 916 State Legislative Measures Introduced

    The Guttmacher Institute Profiles Hostility Increases to Abortion Rights

    Legislators introduced 916 measures related to reproductive health and rights in the 49 state legislatures that had convened their regular session. (Louisiana’s legislature will not convene until late April.) Click here for a detailed analysis at the Guttmacher site.

    By the end of March, seven states had enacted 15 new laws on these issues, including provisions that:

    • expand the pre-abortion waiting period requirement in South Dakota to make it the most onerous in the country, by extending the time from 24 hours to 72 hours and requiring women to visit a crisis pregnancy center in the interim;
    • expand the abortion counseling requirement in South Dakota to mandate that counseling be provided in-person by the physician who will perform the abortion and that counseling include information published after 1972 on all the risk factors related to abortion complications, even if the data are scientifically flawed;
    • require the health departments in Utah and Virginia to develop new regulations governing abortion clinics;
    • revise the Utah abortion refusal clause to allow any hospital employee to refuse to “participate in any way” in an abortion;
    • limit abortion coverage in all private health plans in Utah, including plans that will be offered in the state’s health exchange; and
    • revise the Mississippi sex education law to require all school districts to provide abstinence-only sex education, while permitting discussion of contraception only with prior approval from the state.

    In addition to these laws, more than 120 other bills have been approved by at least one chamber of the legislature, and some interesting trends are emerging. As a whole, the proposals introduced this year are more hostile to abortion rights than in the past: Fifty-six percent of the bills introduced so far this year seek to restrict abortion access, compared with 38% in 2010. Three topics—insurance coverage of abortion, restriction of abortion after a specific point in gestation and ultrasound requirements — are topping the agenda in several states.

    At the same time, legislators are proposing little in the way of proactive initiatives aimed at expanding access to reproductive health-related services. This stands in sharp contrast to recent years, when a range of initiatives to promote comprehensive sex education, permit expedited STI treatment for patients’ partners and ensure insurance coverage of contraception were adopted. For the moment, at least, supporters of reproductive health and rights are almost uniformly playing defense at the state level.

    Insurance Coverage of Abortion

  • Thomas Lawrence, Regency Painter: A Remarkable Blend of of Self-assurance, Artistic Excitement and Ambition

    A Review by Kristin Nord

    Elizabeth Farren by Thomas LawrenceA partial playbill of characters who challenge the viewer from the canvas: a queen, wearied by fractious politics and an unstable husband; the androgynous child in a spectacular crimson jacket and brilliant white shirt, on the cusp of manhood; aristocrats and their families, as well as master builders of what would become the British fiscal-military state. And a succession of young nubile lovelies, striking erotic poses. Taken together they form a story line that would make for Masterpiece Theater series worthy of Downton Abbey or House of Cards.

    Thomas Lawrence: Regency Power and Brilliance, a major retrospective on exhibition through June 5 at the Yale Center for British Art and co-curated with the National Portrait Gallery, London, is no musty set piece. Lawrence’s works challenge, provoke and often innovate in canvases that seem bracingly modern 200 years later. This is a rare chance to see such a variety of his oeuvre in this country. Aside from a handful of portraits — hanging in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston , the Cleveland Museum of Art and The Frick Collection, most of Lawrence’s works remain in private European collections.

    From an early age Lawrence evinced “a remarkable blend of self-assurance, artistic excitement and ambition,” Lucy Pelz, a curator of the show, writes. At five, he was already a child prodigy, busking pencil portraits of guests at the family’s coaching inn in Devizes. After his father’s business failed and the family relocated to Bath, Lawrence became the family’s sole supporter. He was just 11.

    Exceedingly facile as a draftsman, Lawrence appears to have taught himself to work in oils as well. The artist’s survivor’s instincts, prodigious talents and apparent social intelligence enabled him to move with ease from one class to another. His primary subjects included the reigning aristocracy, the families of the wealthy and a succession of military leaders. But he also captured theatrical people, illicit mistresses, and their illegitimate children.

    The show has been arranged thematically, beginning with Lawrence’s emergence as a major artist with his portrait of Queen Charlotte and continuing though a succession of portraits commissioned by George, Prince Regent, of the allied rulers and commanders of victorious leaders after Napoleon’s defeat. Taken together, they interpret then-current ideas about the roles of men and women, and children, and explore through underlying historical references how those ideas were changing. The Regency Period, which extended for 50 years from the start of the French Revolution through the accession of Queen Victoria in 1837, marked a time when British society was increasingly divided by class, religious beliefs, and calls for social and moral reform.Mrs. Jens Wolff

    A young prodigy who became the youngest artist ever elected President of the Royal Academy, Lawrence harbored serious ambitions — and committed himself to lifelong studies, collecting and absorbing techniques from old master models. He was a serious innovator, challenging convention and accepted standards with his choice of brushstrokes and what he called his “half-history” paintings. Lawrence also challenged convention in his use of color, employing dramatic blues and exceedingly vivid whites, and proffered rosy cheeks on his subjects that bordered on serious cases of rosacea. But it was his skill as a draftsman that continued to underpin his efforts.

  • The Disappearing Funds for Reverse Mortgage Counseling

    HR 1473:  Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 (Enrolled Bill [Final as Passed Both House and Senate] – ENR)

      Sec. 2245. Notwithstanding section 1101, the level for ‘Department of Housing and Urban Development, Housing Programs, Housing Counseling Assistance’ shall be $0.

    The National Council on Aging has posted a commentary on the funding bill just passed by both houses of the US Congress, publishing it just prior to the passing of HR 1473. (As noted, the Council is one of the agencies  that provide this counseling)

    Move Will Increase Risks and Financial Burden for Older Vulnerable Homeowners

    Legislation scheduled to pass Congress this week would eliminate all funding, totaling $88 million, for the Housing & Urban Development Department’s (HUD) Housing Counseling Program. These cuts include all funding for federally mandated reverse mortgage counseling. This budget was zeroed-out as part of the FY 2011 Continuing Appropriations Act (H.R. 1473).

    In order to obtain an FHA-insured reverse mortgage, which currently represents 95% of the market, federal guidelines mandate that all borrowers must first go through HUD-approved reverse mortgage counseling. The National Council on Aging (NCOA) is one of eight HECM Intermediaries that provide this counseling service nationwide.

    “This unique counseling helps older homeowners understand the costs, benefits, and risks associated with these loans,” said Barbara Stucki, vice president for Home Equity Initiatives at NCOA. “Without this funding, the older Americans who can least afford it may have to pay for this critical advice out-of-pocket.”

    Over the past three years, NCOA has worked with HUD and the reverse mortgage industry to improve the quality of counseling sessions. In addition, the loss of the counseling funding will impact counselors’ ability to help reverse mortgage borrowers who are in default and at risk of foreclosure.

    “In these difficult economic times, people have to increasingly tap their home equity to make ends meet,” said Stucki. “This new budget proposal is a major setback and increases the financial vulnerability of all older adults looking to use their home to stay at home.”

    NCOA urges Congress and the Administration to restore funding for this critical program for older adults in the upcoming FY 2012 budget discussions.

    Learn more about NCOA’s Home Equity initiatives.

  • A Salon Health Hazard Alert: Hair Straightening Products and Formaldehyde

    The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration has issued a health hazard alert to salons nationwide about the risks that popular hair straightening products, including well-known Brazilian Blowout, pose to salon workers and customers. The agency warned that formaldehyde — a common ingredient in many of the treatments — can cause nose and lung irritation and increases the risk of cancer.

    Following several state investigations and international actions to restrict or ban these products, the agency, a branch of the US Department of Labor, began a nationwide investigation of complaints by salon owners and workers of symptoms associated with the use of chemical straightening procedures, often described as keratin-based or ‘Brazilian.’Woman with dryer

    Environmental Working Group’s own investigation of chemical hair straightening treatments, the largest published to date, turned up numerous complaints of hair loss, blisters, burning eyes, noses and throats, headaches and vomiting in women who had been given or had applied Brazilian-style straightening treatments.

    EWG’s investigation found that many top salons nationwide offer the treatments despite acknowledging concerns over possible health consequences. And some manufacturers have played a common cosmetics-industry name game by touting formulations that were claimed to be formaldehyde-free, claiming that they relied instead on methylene glycol as a miracle alternative.

    EWG’s researchers, as well as scientists at the American Chemistry Council and the Personal Care Products Council, have pointed out that methylene glycol is simply formaldehyde mixed with water. EWG believes that formaldehyde-based products should be taken off the market.

    EWG’s investigation includes:

  • The Tax Man Cometh

    by Rose Madeline Mula

    Why did the IRS extend the tax filing deadline this year to April 18th?*  It just gives me another three days  to plow through drawers and files looking for receipts that I’ll never find.

    And how come we now actually have to provide documentation for every charitable donation? That was a wake-up call. According to my checkbook register, I apparently am nowhere near as generous as I thought I was — or as I used to claim on my tax returns. But if I’m not giving all that money away, where the heck has it gone? Certainly not for designer clothes. I’m wearing ten-year-old jeans . . . well, actually I’m not. They’re still in my closet, but they no longer fit.

    Could I have spent all that unaccounted-for money on ice cream? I’d like to say that a lot of it went into the collection plate at church, but that’s one thing I definitely shouldn’t lie about. I might fool the IRS, but I can’t put one over on an all-seeing God — especially in His own house. Besides, even those contributions now have to be documented. But if I give checks instead of cash, they’ll have my address and will come after me for more. I’d have to get implicated in a crime and join the witness protection program and move to an undisclosed location. But before I do, I really have to get these taxes done.

    Surprisingly, I enjoy making out my tax returns. It’s the only time I can be grateful for all my medical problems. Without them, I’d have almost no deductions. That trip to the emergency room when I cut my hand in a kitchen accident (I was in the kitchen by accident — I seldom go there intentionally) . . . The broken kneecap when I stumbled and fell on Main Street (no — I hadn’t been drinking) . . . The hip replacement and rehab last fall . . . Yes, it was a great year — deduction-wise. Not so good dependents-wise. I have none. Oh, wait! I do have seven mirrors in my home; and a strange old lady lives in all of them. None of them pay me rent, so why can’t I claim them as dependents?

    That will get me a huge refund. How shall I spend it? I know! I’ll take a trip to Italy. Then next year, I’ll be able to write it off as a business expense (doing ‘research’ for my next book, Tortellini, Tarantella, and Tax Tom-Foolery).

    *The filing deadline for individuals was March 1 in 1913,  was changed to March 15 in 1918 and again changed to April 15 in 1955.

    ©2011 Rose Madeline Mula for SeniorWomen.com

    Rose Mula’s most recent book, Image from Amazon
    The
    Beautiful People and Other Aggravations is now available at your favorite bookstore, through Amazon.com and other online bookstores, and through Pelican Publishing (800-843-1724), as is her previous book, If These Are Laugh Lines, I’m Having Way Too Much Fun.

  • When It comes to Speed Dating, Too Much Choice Is a Bad Thing

    Based on new research which was published in Biology Letters, England’s  Royal Society journal.

    Psychologists and behaviour scientists have long been interested in the question of how variety affects the choices we make.  While previous work has examined how the range of options affects our consumer preferences, this is the first time that the effects of variety have been examined in the choices we make in human relationships.

    Alison Lenton and Marco Francesconi studied the choices and characteristics of more than 3600 male and female participants in speed dating events.  In these events, roughly equal numbers of female and male dates are given three minutes to talk to each other and later asked whether an individual date is a ‘yes’ or a ‘no’.  Participants submit an online profile before the event detailing their age, occupation and other details about their character.

    One might imagine that having a wider variety of dates on offer leads to more successful proposals, simply because there is a higher likelihood that participants will come across a date who satisfies their criteria.  However, the scientists used participants’ profiles and the information about whether the mini-dates resulted in a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to show that actually, participants are much more likely to say ‘no’ when presented with a wide variety of choice.

    So, does a wide variety of dates simply make us more choosy about who we say ‘yes’ to?  The authors think not, pointing out that “choosers made more proposals when faced with more options, but fewer proposals when these options were highly variable in their attributes, suggesting that choice variety yields greater confusion rather than greater choosiness … there is nothing to prevent speed daters from ‘hedging bets’ by choosing several options.  Instead, increasing variety led some participants not to choose at all.”

    What follows is the abstract for the research:

    Choice variety is supposed to increase the likelihood that a chooser’s preferences are satisfied. To assess the effects of variety on real-world mate choice, we analysed human dating decisions across 84 speed-dating events (events in which people go on a series of sequential ‘mini-dates’). Results showed that choosers made fewer proposals (positive dating decisions) at events in which the available dates showed greater variety across such attributes as age, height, occupation and education, and this effect was particularly strong when choosers were confronted with a larger number of opposite-sex speed daters. Additionally, participants attending events in which the available options showed greater variety across these attributes were less likely to choose the consensually preferred mate option and more likely to choose no one at all. In contexts in which time is a limited resource, choice variety — rather than facilitating choice quality or increasing choosiness— is confusing and potentially detrimental to choice quality.”