Author: SeniorWomenWeb

  • Seafood Safety: FDA Needs to Improve Oversight of Imported Seafood

    CarpSummary

    About half of the seafood imported into the US comes from farmed fish (aquaculture). Fish grown in confined aquacultured areas can have bacterial infections, which may require farmers to use drugs like antibiotics. The residues of some drugs can cause cancer and antibiotic resistance. The Department of Health and Human Services’ Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is charged with ensuring the safety of seafood against residues from unapproved drugs, and the Department of Commerce’s National Marine Fisheries Service  provides inspection services on request. In 2009, these agencies signed a memorandum of understanding to enhance seafood oversight and leverage inspection resources. GAO was asked to assess the extent to which FDA’s program is able to ensure the safety of seafood imports against residues from unapproved drugs and FDA and NMFS have implemented the 2009 MOU. GAO reviewed data and documents from each agency and interviewed agency officials and other key stakeholders.

    FDA’s oversight program to ensure the safety of imported seafood from residues of unapproved drugs is limited, especially as compared with the European Union. FDA’s program is generally limited to enforcing the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point — the internationally recognized food safety management system — by conducting inspections of foreign seafood processors and importers each year.

    These inspections involve FDA inspectors reviewing records to ensure the processors and importers considered significant hazards, including those resulting from drug residues if the seafood they receive are from fish farms. The inspectors generally do not visit the farms to evaluate drug use or the capabilities, competence, and quality control of laboratories that analyze the seafood. In addition, FDA has conducted foreign country assessments in five countries to gather information about those countries’ aquaculture programs. However, these assessments have been limited by FDA’s lack of procedures, criteria, and standards.

    In contrast, the EU reviews foreign government structures, food safety legislation, the foreign country’s fish farm inspection program, and visits farms to ensure that imported seafood products come from countries with seafood safety systems equivalent to that of the EU. In addition, the scope of FDA’s sampling program, which supplements its oversight program, is limited.

    Specifically, the sampling program does not generally test for drugs that some countries and the EU have approved for use in aquaculture. Consequently, seafood containing residues of drugs not approved for use in the United States may be entering US commerce.

    Further, FDA’s sampling program is ineffectively implemented. For example, for fiscal years 2006 through 2009, FDA missed its assignment plan goal for collecting import samples by about 30 percent. In addition, in fiscal year 2009, FDA tested about 0.1 percent of all imported seafood products for drug residues. Moreover, FDA’s reliance on 7 of its 13 laboratories to conduct all its aquaculture drug residue testing raises questions about the agency’s use of resources.

  • Television, Music and Playwrighting: “Women Today Don’t Go Away”

    Maureen Dowd’s New York Times Sunday Opinion column, Corsets, Cleavage, Fishnets,  said it all about the upcoming television season by quoting a male TV producer:

    ” ‘It’s the Hendricks syndrome,” said one top male TV producer here. “All the big, corporate men saw Christina Hendricks play the bombshell secretary on Mad Men and fell in love. It’s a hot fudge sundae for men: a time when women were not allowed to get uppity or make demands. If the woman got pregnant, she had to drive to a back-alley abortionist in New Jersey. If you got tired of women, they had to go away. Women today don’t go away.”

    “A top female entertainment executive says ‘it’s not a coincidence that these retro shows are appearing at the same time men are confused about who to be. A lot of women are making more money and getting more college degrees. The traditional roles of dominant and submissive roles are reversed in many cases. Everything was clearer in the ’60s.’ “

    But all is not lost, culturally, that is. The Baltimore Symphony Orchestra has announced its coming season and there are women celebrated by a group of composers and an symphony orchestra’s director.

    Music Director Marin Alsop and the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra  announce the Orchestra’s 2011‐2012 season, the fifth full season under the direction of Maestra Alsop.

  • I Forgot to Pack Snowshoes

    by Roberta McReynoldsmodern snowshoe

    Call me eager, or a strategist, but either way my Amtrak tickets were in hand weeks in advance for a trip to Reno in February. I anticipated crowded conditions President’s Day weekend, but leaving on a Thursday would put me ahead of those passengers extending the 3-day holiday weekend to include Friday. Returning on Sunday should also get me home the day before they all returned. I had it all figured out!

    My fellow travelers would predictably be a mixture of tourists who intended to squeeze in one last weekend of skiing and those who had their sights (and wallets) set on gambling in Nevada. The purpose of my trip was an extremely special, once-in-a-lifetime event; my son was legalizing the adoption of his two step-children. The courthouse had informed them that family could attend the proceedings and I was going to be sitting there like a puffed up mother hen with her wings wrapped around her chicks, clucking proudly.

    try to travel light, really I do. I have the best intentions every time I begin packing. Gifts for all four grandchildren are an absolute necessity. (I’d probably opt to wear the same clothes the entire weekend before I’d dare show up empty-handed.) This time there was also a package for my son and daughter-in-law to celebrate the event, plus an extra outfit and shoes to wear to the courthouse. Bulky winter clothing always takes up more space; I can hardly be personally blamed for that kind of hindrance to my noble goals. Once the suitcase and side pockets were bulging with as much stress on the zippers as I dared to inflict, the overflow poured into a shoulder bag large enough to hold my purse, an insulated lunch bag, water bottle, camera, book, iPod, notebook, hand warmers, gloves, scarf, tiny first aid kit, a small pillow to put behind my neck … well, you get the picture.

    I suspect there is something psychological about traveling over Donner Summit that kicks me into survivor mode. I read the history of that ill-fated party of settlers at an impressionable, tender age (without my parents’ permission). If it were feasible to include a pack mule loaded with provisions as a traveling companion, I’d seriously consider it.

    Arrangements had been made for someone to pick me up at the house and drop me off at the depot, and another friend would meet me at Amtrak when I returned on Sunday evening. Everything was lined up and I was good to go. Well … there was that unexpected change in the weather since I’d purchased my tickets almost a month ago; a storm over the Pacific was on the way and expected to deliver lots (meaning feet, not inches) of snow at unusually low elevations. But wouldn’t that be pretty? Weather forecasters predicted the storm to blow in directly behind me, quite literally following my itinerary.

    The quickest and most affordable schedule to get from Point A to Point B isn’t exactly simple or direct. I boarded the train in Modesto for a 30-minute ride north to Stockton. That isn’t even enough time to get settled and comfortable. I decided to use those precious minutes visiting the dining car to purchase a sandwich to add to my lunch bag. I’ve gone over the summit in snowstorms before, but this time I had this unshakable, nagging feeling that a little extra food in my stash would be prudent. Yes, even though I already had sufficient snacks tucked in the pockets of my shoulder bag to hold off any threat of starvation for longer than I care to admit.

    Back in my seat, I checked the time and began watching for Stockton landmarks. It’s wise to gather belongings and be ready to disembark immediately, because the depot stops are quite brief. Suitcases often get wedged below layers of other baggage in the luggage rack and can take a few minutes to dislodge. Once passengers get off the train, there is a wall of new, over-packed replacements shoving their way through the doors.

    I’m always the one positioning myself in the lower level of the train ten minutes early. Gripping the extended handle of my suitcase-on-wheels in one hand and balancing the shoulder bag on the opposite side of my body for balance, I have my nose pressed to the window in anticipation of the split-second the doors open. I wait impatiently, muscles tensed against the force of the brakes as the train begins to slow, looking much like a determined racehorse ready to break away from the gates at the Kentucky Derby.

  • Report of the Preliminary Inquiry Into the Matter of Senator John E. Ensign

    Fascinating weekend reading … or even sooner. There’s an expression, “You Can’t Make This Stuff Up.” So true:

    SUBMITTED TO THE UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS BY CAROL ELDER BRUCE, SPECIAL COUNSEL

    Introduction

    The United States Senate Select Committee on Ethics ( SSCE or Committee ), assisted by Special Counsel, conducted a Preliminary Inquiry into certain conduct of Senator John E. Ensign.

    The scope of the Preliminary Inquiry included an examination into allegations that Senator Ensign violated Senate rules and federal law, including provisions of the criminal code, and/or engaged in conduct that reflecting discredit upon the United States Senate regarding the termination of Doug Hampton s Senate employment, Mr. Hampton’s post-employment contacts with the Senate, and payments made to the Hamptons, and any other matters as the Committee may direct.

    On April 21, 2011, as the Preliminary Inquiry neared its conclusion, Senator Ensign announced he would resign as the 24th Senator from the State of Nevada. Senator Ensign’s resignation was effective May 3, 2011, the day before his sworn deposition was scheduled to begin.

    Although Senator Ensign s resignation divests the Committee of jurisdiction to  impose discipline on him as of its effective date, Special Counsel, as required by the governing Resolution and Rules of the Senate, tenders this Report to the Committee for its consideration in the exercise of its continuing authority, obligations, and discretion under the Resolution and Rules.

    The Committee s investigation began after it received a complaint on June 24, 2009, from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington ( CREW ). CREW supplemented that complaint on October 6, 2009.  These filings presented allegations of sexual harassment/employment discrimination, post-employment ban violations, and issues related to payments to Douglas and Cynthia Hampton, Senator Ensign s former Administrative Assistant and campaign treasurer.

    Based on these serious allegations and other information available to it, the  Committee undertook an extensive Preliminary Inquiry as provided by Rule 3 of its Supplementary Procedural Rules.  Article I, section 5, clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States of  America provides that [e]ach House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a member.

    Under the Committee s authorizing resolution, Senate Resolution 338, 88 th  Cong. 2d Sess.  (1964) ( S. Res. 338 ), the Committee is empowered to investigate not only violations of law, the Senate Code of Official Conduct, and the rules and regulations of the Senate, but also  improper conduct which may reflect upon the Senate. While Senators are expected to comply with all laws, Senate Rules and Standards of Conduct, the Senate and the Committee have made clear that a Senator’s obligations of ethical behavior go beyond this:

  • Lesson Number One

    Swan

    by Joan L. Cannon

    When I think of the lessons I’ve learned through a life that has fulfilled actuarial expectations (and then some), there are many to choose from for the top of the list. Most people who have passed four-score are likely to be in the same boat. It’s one of the things that go with this age to become self-conscious about what, if anything, might be useful for our offspring and anyone enough younger not to have had time to find out what we have. After all, we’re a rare animal in our ability to pass on information and to learn from it. Seems kind of like a duty.

    When you’re groping for the imagined summit of adulthood through the fog of adolescence, you’re too often unable to see the proverbial forest for the trees. Some people tend to watch the path ahead right in front of their toes, and others are staring up into the canopy. Both are sure to trip  often. About half of what happens for good or ill will be the result of providence, coincidence, chance and that ineffable thing called Luck A bad choice is equally as likely (if not more so) than a good one. Even among my oldest and closest friends, my luck beats most of theirs.

    You just don’t get a choice about where and when — what generation, century, country — you get to be born. My schoolmates and I  know something about new ideas and situations, arriving as we did in time for the Great Depression, World War II, atomic science, and electronic wonders that boggle any thinking mind almost daily even now. I have two centenarians as acquaintances, and have interviewed one at some length. She made me appreciate that at least I grew up in a part of the US with electricity and indoor plumbing for everyone we knew. Granted, my grandfather’s farm kitchen still had a wood stove his cook preferred to the gas one. However, antibiotics were still new, and I’m lucky to be alive after a severe illness when I was in my early teens.

    Even as a child, I was in love with love — for the natural world, for the flora and fauna and weather, and words. Partly this was thanks to my parents and their insistence that I had to go to camp, partly because of an impressive grandmother of the “old school,” and partly because of a school that fostered all intellectual curiosity.

  • PBS’ Frontline Presents Kill/Capture

    Tuesday, May 10, 2011, at 9 p.m. ET on PBS

    Frontline Kill/Capture
    www.facebook.com/frontlinepbs
    Twitter: @frontlinepbs

    Behind the strike that killed Osama bin Laden on May 1st was one of the US military’s best kept secrets: an extraordinary campaign by elite US soldiers to take out thousands of Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters. A six-month investigation by Frontline has gone inside the “kill/capture” program to discover new evidence of the program’s impact — and its costs.

    Watch the full episode. See more FRONTLINE.

    Gen. David Petraeus, since he took command of troops last year, has ordered a major expansion of these “manhunt” missions that rely on highly classified intelligence, cutting-edge technology and Special Operations forces.

    In Kill/Capture, (check local listings), Frontline producers Dan Edge (The Wounded Platoon) and Stephen Grey (Extraordinary Rendition) explore the logic behind the kill/capture policy, and ask if this unremitting pursuit of the enemy will help end the war in Afghanistan. “If you are trying to take down an industrial strength insurgency, you take away its safe havens, you take away its leaders, by detaining them or in some cases killing them,” Gen. Petraeus tells Frontline of his decision to step up kill/capture missions after he took command in Afghanistan last summer. The military say these operations have led to the death or detention of more than 12,000 Taliban insurgents over the last 12 months.

    Petraeus and his advisers argue that a ruthless, accurate and relentless campaign against enemy leaders will paralyse the insurgency and force them to the negotiating table. “The intent is to do so much damage to the network that it becomes more viable for the enemy to negotiate than to continue to fight,” says David Kilcullen, an influential military advisor and counterinsurgency expert.

  • No Taypayer Funding for Abortion Act and Repealing Funding for State Health Exchanges

    We thank Women’s Policy, Inc for the following news:

    Abortion Funding Bill Clears House Floor

    On May 4, the House passed, 251-175, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act (H.R. 3), after defeating, 192-235, a motion to recommit by Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA) to prevent federal officials from reviewing the medical records of victims of rape or incest. The Judiciary Committee approved the legislation on March 3 (see The Source, 3/4/11).

    The bill would permanently eliminate federal funding for abortion except in cases of rape, incest, or to protect the life and health of the mother. Federal health facilities or federally employed health care providers would be prohibited from offering or providing abortion services.

    The bill would include the District of Columbia in the definition of “federal government” and prohibit D.C. from using federal or local funds to provide abortion services. The measure also would prohibit discrimination against health care entities or providers that refuse to provide or refer for abortion services.

    As amended, the bill incorporates the provisions of H.R. 1232, which the Ways and Means Committee approved on March 31 (see The Source, 4/1/11). H.R. 1232 would amend the tax code to prevent the costs incurred for abortion services from being considered as medical expenses for tax purposes. Current law allows individuals to deduct uncompensated medical expenses that exceed 7.5 percent of their adjusted gross income. As is the case with federal funding for abortions, the restriction on medical expenses would not apply in cases of rape, incest, or where the life of the mother is in jeopardy.

    The measure would prohibit individuals from receiving tax credits for the purchase of health plans that include coverage for abortions and small business owners from receiving tax credits for contributions to provide employees with insurance plans that cover abortion. Under the legislation, any reimbursements from health flexible spending accounts or health savings accounts for abortion services would be treated as gross income.

  • Woman of Note: Charlotte Salomon’s Life? or Theatre?

    Charlotte kneeling
    In the early years of World War II, Charlotte Salomon, a 23-year-old Jewish artist from Berlin, fled to the south of France where she shut herself into a hotel room and spent two years feverishly painting the history of her life. She called it Life? or Theatre?: A Play With Music, an astounding body of over 1300 powerfully drawn and expressively colored gouache paintings conceived as a sort of autobiographical operetta on paper. On one numbered page after another, Salomon used an inventive mixture of images, dialogue, commentary and musical cues to tell a compelling coming-of-age story set amidst family suicides and increasing Nazi oppression. This singular creation would be Salomon’s only major work. Just one year after she completed Life? or Theatre?, the pregnant 26-year-old was transported to Auschwitz and killed.

    The Contemporary Jewish Museum will be the only museum on the West Coast to show this new installation of Charlotte Salomon: Life? or Theatre?, an exhibition featuring nearly 300 of Salomon’s gouaches from the collection of the Jewish Historical Museum in Amsterdam. The exhibition highlights the main acts of Salomon’s sweeping narrative, allowing visitors to appreciate not just the individual strength of each piece but also its serial nature.

    Life? or Theatre? is an extraordinary work of art that deserves and needs to be seen,” says Connie Wolf, director of the Contemporary Jewish Museum. “Anyone with an interest in the creative spirit will be moved and awed by Salomon’s compelling magnum opus. This lifetime of work, created in such a short space of time with no promise or even hope of recognition, speaks so deeply to how essential an act of art making can be. We are so thrilled to be able to bring this to a wider audience.”

    THE STORY

    Salomon structured Life? or Theatre? as a play with a prologue, a main part, and a finale. The prologue focuses on her childhood and adolescence in Weimar and Nazi Berlin; the main section on a man who would be Salomon’s greatest artistic inspiration and first love; and the epilogue on her life in exile.

    The story was certainly her story, and she recollects it in detail, but as her own title suggests, Salomon fictionalized elements. Certain inventions are immediately apparent — she gave stage names to the family and friends that became her cast of characters including her own stand in, Charlotte Kann — but the extent to which the narrative of Life? or Theatre? embellishes or strays from the truth remains, in some respects, unknown. The exhibit has now been extended til October 16th. 

  • Dollars for Doctors, Pro Publica’s Investigation: Financial Ties Bind Medical Societies to Drug and Device Makers

    Billboards from a medical device company near Moscone Center in San Francisco, site of a Heart Rhythm Society convention. Photo by Robert Durell for ProPublica.

    From the time they arrived to the moment they laid their heads on hotel pillows, the thousands of cardiologists attending this week’s Heart Rhythm Society conference have been bombarded with pitches for drugs and medical devices.

    St. Jude Medical adorns every hotel key card. Medtronic ads are splashed on buses, banners and the stairs underfoot. Logos splay across shuttle bus headrests, carpets and cellphone-charging stations.

    At night, a drug firm gets the last word: A promo for the heart drug Multaq stood on each doctor’s nightstand Wednesday.

    Who arranged this commercial barrage? The society itself, which sold access to its members and their purchasing power.

    Last year’s four-day event brought in more than $5 million, including money for exhibit booths the size of mansions and company-sponsored events. This year, there are even more “promotional opportunities,” as the society describes them.

    Concerns about the influence of industry money have prompted universities such as Stanford and the University of Colorado-Denver to ban drug sales representatives from the halls of their hospitals and bar doctors from paid promotional speaking.

    Yet, one area of medicine still welcomes the largesse: societies that represent specialists. It’s a relationship largely hidden from public view, said David Rothman, who studies conflicts of interest in medicine as director of the Center on Medicine as a Profession at Columbia University.

    Professional groups such as the Heart Rhythm Society are a logical target for the makers of drugs and medical devices. They set national guidelines for patient treatments, lobby Congress about Medicare reimbursement issues, research funding and disease awareness, and are important sources of treatment information for the public.

    Dozens of such groups nationwide encompass every medical specialty from orthopedics to hypertension.

  • A Day in the Life of a Fashionable Parisian Townhouse at the Getty

    Lady Fastening Her Garter by Boucher

    The nation of France, and its capital city of Paris in particular, held a special status in European culture during the 18th century. The upper echelons of societies throughout Europe were predominantly Francophiles — imitating French fashions of dress and furniture in their daily lives. On view in the Exhibitions Pavilion at the J. Paul Getty Museum at the Getty until August 7, Paris: Life & Luxury re-imagines, through art and material culture, the complex and nuanced lifestyle of elite 18th century Parisians who made their city the fashionable and cultural epicenter of Europe.

    Inspired by the Getty Museum’s extensive French decorative arts collection and the correspondingly strong holdings of French illustrated books in the Getty Research Institute, Paris: Life & Luxury provides a rich cultural and historical experience that closely mirrors daily life in 18th century France. Bringing together approximately 160 objects, roughly half of which will be on loan from twenty-six museums and private collections around the world, the exhibition includes a wide range of paintings, sculpture, applied arts, drawings, metalwork, furniture, architectural fittings, lighting and hearth fixtures, scientific and musical instruments, clocks and watches, textiles and dress, books, and maps.

    David Bomford, acting director of the J. Paul Getty Museum said,  “Paris: Life & Luxury transports viewers back to Paris in the mid-1700s. More than celebrating the period or perpetuating the mythology of its charm and gallantry, this exhibition re-imagines the varied and complex range of values and practices of the city’s elite within a rich material context.”

    Following a structure based on the traditional visual allegories of the Four Times of Day, the objects in the exhibition are grouped according to their associations with common activities as pursued in the chronology of a single day, from morning to night. As such, objects of diverse mediums are juxtaposed, as they would have been within an 18th -century Parisian domestic setting, regardless of modern museological or academic categories. Through constellations of art and related artifacts, the exhibition follows the conventional activities in the cycle of a Parisian day, such as dressing, writing, collecting, eating, and evening entertainment — allowing visitors to envision the activities and accessories of quotidian life, in order to find resonances with their own daily lives.