Author: SeniorWomenWeb

  • How Gender Stereotypes Influence Emerging Career Aspirations

    Shelley Correll presents to the audience stereotypes that exist in today’s workplace and career field and why men are dominant in the areas of math and science. She gives reasons for why stereotypes cause certain results and shows many studies that have proven these ideas.

    Dr. Correll has been appointed as the Barbara D. Finberg Director of the Michelle R. Clayman InstituteThe Clayman Institute for Gender at Stanford University.

    As Director, Correll plans to address the question:  Can we move beyond the stalled gender revolution? Twenty years ago, Arlie Hochschild described the gender revolution as stalled, noting that while women had flooded into the paid labor market, men had not increased their involvement in the household, thereby limiting the potential of women in the workplace. More recently, scholars have identified further evidence of a stall in the movement towards gender equality.  Whether we look at metrics in the workplace such as the gender gap in wages, or the participation of women male dominated fields, the paid labor market, and state-level politics, measures of equality have remained relatively constant since the mid 1990s.

    Correll’s own research focuses on what she calls the “micro-foundations of gender inequality,” identifying how social psychological processes reproduce structures of gender inequality. In particular, she studies how differing expectations shape the everyday experiences of women and men in work and school environments.

  • Progress – You Gotta Love It! (Or Not)

    by Rose Madeline MulaWoolworth's Logo

    My friend Abigail (nowhere near her real name) was born in the wrong era and place.  She would have been much happier living in Victorian England (preferably with her idols, the Bronte sisters), an age uncontaminated by technological abominations like the internal combustion engine, the Internet (which she is convinced is inherently evil), e-mail, telephone answering machines, and even telephones, for that matter.
    And if she must have a phone, why does she have to dial the numbers herself (yes, she still has a rotary dial phone).  She misses that friendly voice that used to ask, “Number please.”
    As for cell phones, you possibly can guess what she thinks about them.  I showed her mine one day, and she said, “Why on earth do you want something like that!  Throw it away!”
    Though she does appreciate elevators in stores, now that she’s older and her joints creak when climbing stairs, she rues the day she had to start pushing the floor buttons herself.  She misses that nice white-gloved operator in store elevators who announced the departments at each stop.
    Several years ago, Abigail moved into a house with a dishwasher.  She has never turned it on.  She uses it to store her extra china.  Ditto the microwave oven over the stove.  She does store food in the refrigerator, but she had been perfectly happy with her old ice box which didn’t use any electricity at all; but unfortunately, the iceman stopped coming around.   She’s very suspect about not just her fridge, but anything that requires a plug in order to function.  She would never buy a blender or an electric beater.  A wooden spoon was good enough for her grandmother, and it’s good enough for her.
    The last I heard, Abigail still didn’t have a washing machine.  She rinses out her “personals” in the bathroom sink and scrubs her sheets and towels in the bathtub.  Clothes dryer?  Don’t be ridiculous.  God made trees to string clotheslines from, didn’t He?
    Abigail simply cannot adjust to the modern age.
    She thinks ATM machines are an invention of the devil.  She certainly would never trust her good money to one (even if she could figure out how to make it work).  And she’s definitely suspicious of electronic bank deposits.  She still insists that Uncle Sam mail her Social Security check to her home.
    She misses all the beautiful baby carriages with their lovely hand-knit blankets that proud mothers used to push, instead of those collapsible monstrosities they cart their children around in today.
    She is beyond shocked that young women actually wash their hair—and even go swimming!—when they have their period.  She’s even more dismayed that periods are actually discussed in public.  And in mixed company yet, as well as in print ads and TV commercials!  (Yes, she did succumb and buy a television set, but she watches only cultural PBS programs, and refuses to learn how to use the remote control.)
    Abigail also cannot understand pregnant women appearing in public, unembarrassed by their big bellies.  Don’t they realize people will know how they got that way?  In her day, they were much more discreet.
    She often wonders whatever happened to aprons and house dresses.  In fact, she questions whatever happened to dresses, period.  She is convinced that American culture degenerated when women began wearing pants.  That was when wives started to think that maybe their husbands shouldn’t be the boss and tell them what to do.  Tsk! Tsk!  Everyone knows that men are smarter and should rule the household.  Women should not be worrying their pretty heads about things they don’t understand.  The whole “women’s liberation” nonsense is unnatural and sinful, she maintains.
    She drives twenty miles out of her way to a service station where the nice young man at the cash register will come out to pump the gas for her.  She’d never dream of doing it herself (again, even if she knew how).  She’s a lady, and that’s man’s work.
    And why, in heaven’s name, do her contemporaries, and even much younger females, want to be called “women” instead of “girls”?  What’s that all about?
    She decries the demise of women’s hats and white gloves.  A Catholic, she would never dream of entering a church hatless, regardless of the new rules.  And she still won’t eat meat on Fridays, no matter what that progressive Pope said decades ago.  She never did quite trust him.
    Abigail really hates super markets.  The bigger they are, the more she detests them.  She misses the small neighborhood independent grocer who waited on you (no reaching to shelves and into bins to select your own food) and wrote and added up the prices on a paper bag.  What’s more, he knew how much change to give you from a twenty dollar bill without having a new-fangled machine tell him.  Furthermore, you always got change from a twenty when you bought a week’s worth of groceries.
    As for those groceries, I bet she’s secretly glad that Mr. Birdseye invented frozen foods, though she’d never admit to using them.
    And why is everyone always carrying a bottle of water wherever they go, she wonders.  Do they think they’re going to suddenly be abducted by aliens and dropped in the middle of the Sahara?
    She liked it better before anyone had ever heard of cholesterol.  How are you supposed to make a flaky pie crust without lard, she asks.  And how come real sour cream, real butter, real bacon—in fact, anything really tasty—are now no-no’s?
    And whatever happened to music, Abigail wants to know.  She can’t believe the hideous sounds produced by today’s rock bands that have names like “Post-Surgical Adhesions.”  As far as she’s concerned there hasn’t been any music worth listening to since Lawrence Welk went to that big bandstand in the sky.  The last singing group she enjoyed were those lovely Maguire Sisters.  And she absolutely refuses to believe that one of them could ever have been involved with a Mafioso.
    As for movies, Abigail hasn’t been to one since the Hays Office was abolished, but she has heard that without censorship the cinema has sunk to unbelievable depravity.   Couples are actually shown in double beds!  Worse, on-screen nudity is allowed!  (She spells it “nudirty.”)  She also has heard that the language is atrocious.  If she were ever unfortunate enough to enter a movie theater these days, she knows she would have to be physically restrained from rushing down the aisle to wash out the actors’ mouths with soap.  But even if the movies were still decent, she wouldn’t go.  She understands that the price is fifty times what it used to be—even with a senior discount—and there’s no second feature, no newsreel, and no free dishes.
    And it’s not just the movies.  Everything is ridiculously expensive these days.  She can’t get over the fact that a couple of root canals and a filling cost more than she and her husband paid for their first house.
    But, then, nothing is the same as it used to be.  Abigail went to a high school reunion recently and was horrified to see that the gorgeous football hero hunk she had had a huge crush on in her senior year had deteriorated to a wizened, wrinkled mess.  How could he have let himself go so in such a short time?
    And speaking of school, she is absolutely horrified that colleges now have co-ed dorms and uni-sex bathrooms.  (I have to admit that so am I, actually.)
    I also agree with Abigail on a few other issues:
    Why aren’t they making mirrors like they did fifty years ago?  These new ones certainly don’t reflect images accurately.  All of mine apparently are covered with hairline cracks that make my face look like a topographical map. And why do we have to pay $125 for a jar of face cream we used to get at Woolworths for twenty-five cents?  And whatever happened to Woolworths, by the way?
    OMG!  I’m beginning to sound like Abigail!  Next thing I know, I’ll be tossing my computer out the window and trading in my car for a horse and buggy.

    My friend Abigail (nowhere near her real name) was born in the wrong era and place.  She would have been much happier living in Victorian England (preferably with her idols, the Bronte sisters), an age uncontaminated by technological abominations like the internal combustion engine, the Internet (which she is convinced is inherently evil), e-mail, telephone answering machines, and even telephones, for that matter.

    And if she must have a phone, why does she have to dial the numbers herself (yes, she still has a rotary dial phone).  She misses that friendly voice that used to ask, “Number please.”

    As for cell phones, you possibly can guess what she thinks about them.  I showed her mine one day, and she said, “Why on earth do you want something like that!  Throw it away!”

    Though she does appreciate elevators in stores, now that she’s older and her joints creak when climbing stairs, she rues the day she had to start pushing the floor buttons herself.  She misses that nice white-gloved operator in store elevators who announced the departments at each stop.

    Several years ago, Abigail moved into a house with a dishwasher.  She has never turned it on.  She uses it to store her extra china.  Ditto the microwave oven over the stove.  She does store food in the refrigerator, but she had been perfectly happy with her old ice box which didn’t use any electricity at all; but unfortunately, the iceman stopped coming around.  

    She’s very suspect about not just her fridge, but anything that requires a plug in order to function.  She would never buy a blender or an electric beater.  A wooden spoon was good enough for her grandmother, and it’s good enough for her.

    The last I heard, Abigail still didn’t have a washing machine.  She rinses out her “personals” in the bathroom sink and scrubs her sheets and towels in the bathtub.  Clothes dryer?  Don’t be ridiculous.  God made trees to string clotheslines from, didn’t He?

    Abigail simply cannot adjust to the modern age.

    She thinks ATM machines are an invention of the devil.  She certainly would never trust her good money to one (even if she could figure out how to make it work).  And she’s definitely suspicious of electronic bank deposits.  She still insists that Uncle Sam mail her Social Security check to her home.

    She misses all the beautiful baby carriages with their lovely hand-knit blankets that proud mothers used to push, instead of those collapsible monstrosities they cart their children around in today.

    She is beyond shocked that young women actually wash their hair — and even go swimming! — when they have their period.  She’s even more dismayed that periods are actually discussed in public.  And in mixed company yet, as well as in print ads and TV commercials!  (Yes, she did succumb and buy a television set, but she watches only cultural PBS programs, and refuses to learn how to use the remote control.)

  • Where Are the Women? The Old Boys Club Meeting and Deficit Talks

    The Older Women’s Economic Security (OWES) Task Force, part of the National Coalition of Women’s Organizations (NCWO), in a letter to President Barack Obama called for the concerns of women to be considered in budget talks to reduce the deficit. The task force asked that members of the administration with expertise on women’s issues be added to the White House’s advisory team discussing strategies to reduce deficit spending.

    “It is simply not enough to send a few privileged men to the table to ‘solve’ the nation’s budget problem,” states the letter from the OWES Task Force. “We welcome the opportunity to bring our voices and expertise to a discussion with you and your advisors, and we request that members of your administration with expertise on women’s issues, such as Secretary Hilda Solis and Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, be added to the White House’s advisory team working on these negotiations.”Roosevelt signing the SS bill

    Signers to the letter include leaders from the National Organization for Women (NOW), the Black Women’s Health Imperative, the Business and Professional Women’s Foundation, Dialogue on Diversity, the Older Women’s League, U.S. Women’s Chamber of Commerce, Women’s Committee of 100, the Women’s Institute for a Secure Retirement, the Women’s Research and Education Institute, and the YWCA USA.

    “Under the guise of reducing the deficit, conservatives in Congress have set their sights on cutting programs that disproportionately employ and serve women,” said NOW President Terry O’Neill. “Who will stand up for the millions of women who rely on these programs? Leaving it to the men is not the answer. Women must play a critical role in these negotiations.”

    Today, congressional leaders are gathering to meet with Vice President Joe Biden and his economic advisors at the historic Blair House to address the deficit. The talks come at a time when cuts to programs that are vital to women and their families — including Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security — are being considered within far-reaching budget plans.

    The old boys club meeting has consisted of Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA), U.S. Senators John Kyl (R-AZ), Daniel Inouye (D-HI), Max Baucus (D-MT), Reps. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), and Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), who have convened for the budget negotiations with Vice President Biden, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, Budget Director Jack Lew, and economic adviser Gene Sperling.

    Social Security is a lifeline to many older women, keeping them out of poverty. According to a report from the Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR), in 2009, Social Security helped more than 14 million Americans aged 65 and older stay above the poverty line. Without access to Social Security, 58 percent of women and 48 percent of men above the age of 75 would be living below the poverty line.

    Women are now faced with an added economic challenge because they are not getting their fair share of jobs in the recovery. Even though the recession was dubbed a ‘mancession’ jobs are now being gained at a faster rate for men than for women. While men have recovered 24 percent of the jobs they lost during the recession, women have recovered only 14 percent of the jobs they lost. Single mothers and women of color are particularly at risk; their unemployment rates remain in the double digits.

    The gender wage gap is an ongoing economic hurdle for women, who have lower median earnings than men in 107 out of 111 occupations, regardless of levels of education, according to research from IWPR.

    You can find the full OWES Task Force letter to the President here.

    Photograph: President Roosevelt signs the Social Security Act, at approximately 3:30 pm EST on August 14, 1935. Standing with Roosevelt are Rep. Robert Doughton (D-NC); unknown person in shadow; Sen. Robert Wagner (D-NY); Rep. John Dingell (D-MI); unknown man in bowtie; the Secretary of Labor, Frances Perkins; Sen. Pat Harrison(D-MS); and Rep. David Lewis (D-MD).

  • Expedited Entry and Screening While Traveling

    Editor’s Note: Having just returned from a trip to England we decided to update our audience on our check-in experience at a US airport (San Francisco) and at Heathrow, outside London. By the way, we carried knitting needles as allowed by Virgin Atlantic. And, this week we noted that our Superior Court notice for Jury Duty in northern California did not allow knitting needles in the waiting room.

    Interestingly enough, we were directed to a line that, including ourselves seemed to be made up of those over 50! And yes, we did take off our shoes, remove belts, phones and the usual assortment of items to be deposited into plastic bins. But we weren’t asked to step into a full-body backscatter scanner at that entry check-through or at Heathrow coming home. However, we were patted down in London before flying back. Would I have opted for the pat-down over the x-ray machine, if asked? Yes, until our airport is fitted with less radiated machines..Global Entry kiosk

    What’s more, we used our Global Entry RFID-enabled card for expedited entry for the first time: “Enrolled users must present their machine-readable Passport or permanent residency card and submit their fingerprints to establish identity. Users then complete a computerized Customs Declaration, and are issued a receipt instructing them to either proceed to baggage claim, or to a normal inspection booth for a normal interview.”

    Some of the other government programs are:

    NEXUS is a bi-national cooperative effort, partnering Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) and US Customs and Border Protection.

    Secure Electronic Network for Travelers Rapid Inspection (SENTRI) is US Customs and Border Protection’s trusted traveler program for approved frequent border crossers at southern land borders.

    A recent (October 2011) TSA memo:

    The Transportation Security Administration (TSA)  announced 29 airports which are set to receive recently purchased millimeter wave Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) machines. The machines will be deployed with new automated target recognition software designed to enhance privacy by eliminating passenger-specific images while improving throughput capabilities and streamlining the checkpoint screening process.AIT Technology

    “We remain committed to implementing technologies that strengthen passenger privacy while ensuring the highest level of security,” said TSA Administrator John S. Pistole. “In addition to improving the passenger experience at the checkpoint, advanced imaging technology continues to give us the greatest opportunity to detect and deter evolving threats to aviation.”

    TSA plans to deploy units to the following airports in the coming months:

  • Examining Proportion of Women Who Survive Following Detection of Breast Cancer Through Screening

    A model used to estimate breast cancer survival rates found that the probability that a woman with screen-detected breast cancer will avoid a breast cancer death because of screening mammography may be lower than previously thought, according to a report published Online First by Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.Mammographies

    “Today, more people are likely to know a cancer survivor than ever before,” the authors write. “Between 1971 and 2007, the number of cancer survivors in the United States more than doubled, from 1.5 percent to 4 percent of the population. Breast cancer survivors are particularly common: they now represent approximately 2.5 million, or one-fifth of the current survivor population.” The authors also note, however, that although “perhaps the most persuasive messages promoting screening mammography come from women who argue that the test ‘saved my life,’” other possibilities for breast cancer survival exist.

    H. Gilbert Welch, M.D., M.P.H., and Brittney A. Frankel, both of Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH, developed a method to estimate the probability that a woman with screen-detected breast cancer had her life saved because of the screening. The authors used DevCan, the National Cancer Institute’s software for analyzing data, to estimate the 10-year risk of diagnosis and the 20-year risk of death. This probability approach also relies on two estimated possibilities for a woman in the general population of the United States: the probability of having breast cancer detected by screening and the probability of avoiding breast cancer mortality (death) because of the screening.

    The authors estimated that for a 50-year old woman, the risk of developing breast cancer in the next 10 years is 2,990 per 100,000. In this age group, 64 percent of breast cancers are found by mammography, suggesting that the risk of having a screen-detected breast cancer during the same period is 1,910 per 100,000. The woman’s observed 20-year probability of breast cancer death is 990 per 100,000. Assuming that screening mammography has already reduced risk of breast cancer death by 20 percent, the risk of death in the absence of screening would be 1,240 per 100,000, suggesting that the estimated benefit of screening amounted to 250 per 100,000. Therefore, the authors estimate that the probability that a woman with screen-detected breast cancer avoids breast cancer death because of mammography is 13 percent (250/1910).

    The probability of the same 50-year-old woman avoiding breast cancer death increases to 17 percent if screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality by 25 percent; however, probability decreases to 3 percent if screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality by 5 percent. Similar analyses conducted for women of varying ages all yield probability estimates below 25 percent.

    “We considered a range of values: namely, that screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality anywhere from 5 percent to 25 percent. The values toward the high end (20 to 25 percent) reflect the randomized trial data from more than a quarter century ago,” the authors conclude. “Consequently, we believe that readers should focus on the values toward the low end (5 to 10 percent) and recognize that the probability that a woman with screen-detected breast cancer has, in fact, avoided a breast cancer death because of screening mammography is now likely to be well below 10 percent.

  • Mysticism: Yearning for the Absolute

    The Museum Rietberg in Zurich, Switzerland presents a culturally comparative exhibition on mysticism. This phenomenon is illustrated by the example of forty male and female mystics: their lives and writings demonstrate just how richly varied spiritual experience can be. The mystics chosen for the exhibition come from the great religions of the world – Hinduism, Buddhism, Daoism, Islam, Judaism and Christianity – and span the period from the 6th century BC until the 19th century.
    Christ and St. John
    Mystics strove for the absolute, the union with the divine, and either attempted to grasp the energy of God or endeavoured to harmonise the forces that move the world. They cultivated the art of self-annihilation and surrender; they fathomed the void, the origin, and strove to find the Dao. Sacred writings, prayers, meditation, ecstatic dances, chants or strict asceticism, but also sensual pleasures, inspired the mystics and helped them on their journey. They wanted to realise the experience of union with God or a transcendent reality in this life, rather than waiting for “redemption” after death or in another life.

    The word “mysticism” is derived from the Greek term mystikos, which means inscrutable, inexplicable or hidden. As of the 6th century, Christianity referred to the experience of the divine presence or union with God as theologia mystica. The word mysticism has only existed since the 17th century. Yet when people speak about different religions and mysticism, it could be assumed that this term has always existed – and in all religions. However, this is not the case. Only in the 19th and 20th centuries did mysticism evolve as a general religious phenomenon or an aspect of inter-religious spiritualism.

    What is on display at the exhibition? Portraits, pictures of saints and devotional objects belonging to some mystics have survived. However, the most important sources of mysticism are the texts, sermons, poems, prayers and chants left to us by the mystics. Their language is often full of ecstatic and associative imagery but mystic texts can also appear rational, have a clear propositional logic or be sober, expressing profound insight and serenity. Many of the protagonists wrote poetry and are among the great poets and singers of their time and culture.Majnun at the grave of Leyli

    The mystics shared ideas that transcended the boundaries of religion: the Christian and Islamic mystics were inspired by the ideas of antiquity espoused by Plato and Plotinus. As the latter said, the human soul is capable of climbing a stairway to the “One” and thus of returning to its divine origin. Central themes include ascending to God in Christian mysticism, and the path to enlightenment in Buddhism, According to Daoist ideas, rising above, or rather hovering along, the axis of the universe leads to immortality.

    The theme of love and desire is explored under the title Yearning for the Absolute. One characteristic of Hindu mysticism is bhakti, or ‘loving participation’. The bhakti saints not only wanted to revere God verbally and in ritual, but also to possess him, and to be possessed, filled, overwhelmed and enslaved by him. The Tantra of the Hidden Union, a Buddhist text, teaches a method of meditation that is expressed in representations of Buddhas or divinities conjoined in acts of sexual love. In Islam, in Sufism, the aim of mystical practices is to struggle against the desires of one’s own soul and to become one with God. The absolute love of God played a central role.Portrait statue of Kukai (774–835)

    The Christian mystics interpreted the love between man and woman described in the Old Testament’s Song of Solomon as an expression of the relationship between God and the human soul. This passionate love also included the profound sympathy felt for the crucified Christ, which was experienced as a union.

    The recovery of divine unity was also a concern of the Cabbalists in Judaism, who attempted to harmonise the ten divine powers, Sefirot, within themselves and in the world. According to Daoism, man in the course of his mystical journey attempts to fathom Dao, the power that underlies all being. This power enables him to master his own body. He becomes a human incarnation of Dao, and is thus immortal.

    The exhibit continues until January 15, 2012.

    Images:

    (1) Christ and St. John: Fragment from the Gradual of St. Katharinental. 
    Unknown artist, probably Constance,  Switzerland, St. Katharinental bei Diessenhofen, 1312. Parchment painted with opaque colours,  Swiss National Museum, Zurich

    (2) Majnun at the grave of Leyli: From the Khamseh (Five Principles) of Nezami
    Qasem ‘Ali, Herat, 1494. Opaque colours, gold and ink on paper. The British Library, London

    (3) Portrait statue of Kukai (774–835): Japan, 15th/16th century. Wood with colourful paint, Wereldmuseum,  Rotterdam

  • Government Could Hide Existence of Records under FOIA Rule Proposal

    by Jennifer LaFleur
    ProPublicaDOJ insignia

    A proposed rule to the Freedom of Information Act would allow federal agencies to tell people requesting certain law-enforcement or national security documents that records don’t exist – even when they do.

    Under current FOIA practice, the government may withhold information and issue what’s known as a Glomar denial that says it can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records.

    The new proposal – part of a lengthy rule revision by the Department of Justice – would direct government agencies to “respond to the request as if the excluded records did not exist.”

    Open-government groups object.

    “We don’t believe the statute allows the government to lie to FOIA requesters,” said Mike German, senior policy counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, which opposes the provision.

    The ACLU, along with Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and OpenTheGovernment.org said the move would “dramatically undermine government integrity by allowing a law designed to provide public access to government to be twisted.

    The Glomar denial arose in the mid-1970s when a Los Angeles Times reporter requested information about the CIA’s Glomar Explorer, built to recover a sunken Soviet submarine and the CIA’s attempt to suppress stories about it.

    But the advocacy groups propose another response: You have requested “…records which, if they exist, would not be subject to the disclosure requirements of FOIA…”

    They prefer such language because a last resort is to sue to obtain the records, something people requesting information might not do if they assumed that no records existed.

    Open government groups also contend that the proposed rule could undermine judicial proceedings.

    In a recent case brought by the ACLU of Southern California, the FBI denied the existence of documents. But the court later discovered that the documents did exist. In an amended order, US District Judge Cormac Carney wrote that the “Government cannot, under any circumstance, affirmatively mislead the Court.”

    DOJ’s draft FOIA rule was first published in March, but DOJ re-opened commentsubmissions in September at the request of open-government groups. The new comment period ended October 19.

    The DOJ did not immediately respond to a request for comment. We will update as soon as it does.

  • Gotham Radio Theater’s Broadcast of Lady Windemere’s Fan and Sorry, Wrong Number

    Download:

    Lady Windemere's Fan Illustration at NYPL

    Lady Windermere’s Fan’ is an Oscar Wilde classic that showcases his trademark wit and is known as a charming, touching piece.  Gotham Radio’s performance brings this celebrated piece to life in their unique ‘radio’ style, complete with Foley sound effects.  (A podcast of the show appears on the NYPL website.)

    Set amidst the swirl of London society in 1893, Lady Windermere is about to celebrate her birthday. A happily married woman, she has a young son and very strict moral standards. The fan of the title is inscribed with her name, Margaret, and a birthday gift from her adoring husband.  When young Lady Windermere finds herself in a compromising position, she is forced to go into hiding, but the tell-tale fan could give away her presence and ruin her reputation. With great storytelling, secret histories revealed and the biting epigrams he is known for, Oscar Wilde blends the black and white of “good” and “bad” into gray.

    Inspired by the Lux Radio Theatre of the 1930’s and 40’s, Gotham Radio Theatre brings the experience of actors performing in vintage radio style. Masterpiece plays and screenplays are performed live, by an ensemble of actors and sound performers as if you were in a radio sound stage.

    The New York Public Library presented three performances of the Wilde play. The library itself also features the Musical of the Month as part of their blog channels.

    The Gotham’s fall season continues with Lucille Fletcher’s chilling  Sorry Wrong Number on Sunday, October 23rd:

    “In this thriller, Leona Stevenson is sick and confined to her bed. One night, while waiting for her husband to return home, she picks up the phone and accidentally overhears a conversation between two men planning a murder. She becomes increasingly desperate as she tries to work out who the victim is in order to prevent the crime. Could it be her? Will anyone believe her? How can she protect herself from brutal killers with only a phone by her bedside?”

    See ‘Sorry, Wrong Number’ page for the Cast List and the clip at the website from the movie starring Barbara Stanwyck … if you dare.  Generic Radio Workshop has the script for the August 21, 1943 broadcast.

    The text for this post and illustration is courtesy of the Gotham Radio Theatre.

  • Las Vegas: Taxes, Lawn Mowing and Job Creation Myths and Realities at the Republican Debate

    Mitt Romney

    FactCheck.org, a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center presented it’s summary and analysis of the most recent Republican Candidates debate:

    Republican candidates hammered each other for 2 hours in a lively Nevada confrontation — and often strayed from the facts.

    • Cain denied that his tax plan would boost taxes for 84 percent of Americans, or fall heavily on those with lower incomes. A new study by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center says just that.
    • Santorum and Bachmann denounced Cain’s 9 percent “business flat tax” as a European-style “value-added” tax, which Cain also denied. The TPC study agrees with Santorum and Bachmann.
    • Romney claimed his Massachusetts health care plan “[doesn’t] have a government insurance plan” and relies on private insurance. Actually, his plan expanded Medicaid, and relies on that state-federal government program to cover many of the state’s previously uninsured.
    • Perry and Romney clashed on job creation. Perry was mostly right in claiming Texas saw a greater number of jobs created than Massachusetts. But he was wrong that his state created more jobs in the last two months than Massachusetts did in four years under Romney.
    • Romney relied on a disputed study from an anti-immigration group when he said “almost half” the jobs created under Perry were for illegal immigrants. Perry called that “an absolute falsehood.” But more neutral estimates support the idea that some portion of the Texas job gains were due to illegal immigration.
    • Perry accused Romney of hiring illegal immigrants, to which Romney said, “I don’t think I’ve ever hired an illegal in my life.”  In fact, there’s no evidence that Romney knowingly hired illegal immigrants — but he hired a lawn service that did, and was slow to fire the contractor.
    • Santorum and Perry were both off base in claiming that Romney once touted his Massachusetts plan as a model for the nation. He didn’t. He said it wasn’t necessarily right for all states.

    Cain’s Tax Plan

    Santorum said a new analysis shows Cain’s plan would increase taxes for a large majority of Americans, which Cain denied.

    Santorum: Herman’s well-meaning, and I love his boldness, and it’s great. But the fact of the matter is, I mean, reports are now out that 84 percent of Americans would pay more taxes under his plan. That’s the analysis. …

    Cain said that “simply is not true.” He also said his plan “does not raise taxes on those that are making the least.”

    But Santorum is correct. An analysis posted a few hours before the debate by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center concluded that Cain’s 9-9-9 plan (for 9 percent flat taxes on personal incomes, business transactions and retail sales of goods and services) would result in tax increases for 83.8 percent of all individuals and families, compared with what they would pay under current tax policy. Taxes would decrease for those making over $200,000 a year, with those making over $1 million a year paying 15 percent less in taxes than under current policy (which assumes the Bush tax cuts are extended). As for those “making the least,” the TPC analysis — which is based on a computer model of the tax system similar to the models used by the Treasury Department and the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation — concludes that those making less than $10,000 a year would see an average tax increase of $1,122, and those making between $10,000 and $20,000 would see taxes go up an average of $2,705.Herman Cain

    The Tax Policy Center analysis is the most extensive and sophisticated yet attempted by any independent group. It concludes that “the three taxes combined are equivalent to a 25.38 percent national sales tax,” which is a conclusion very close to one reached earlier by a former chief of staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, Edward Kleinbard, who found Cain’s three taxes would have the same effect as a 27 percent tax on wage income, and would “raise the tax burden on many low- and middle-income taxpayers.

  • Rose of Sharon

    Rose of Sharon

    by Ferida Wolff

    I lived in the city when I was growing up. There wasn’t much room for growing things in the summer. My backyard consisted mainly of a paved driveway and a small slab of concrete, room enough for a couple of chairs that were never sat on. The tiny plot of grass was home to an outdoor clothes dryer. By contrast, the front of my house seemed almost lush. There were rows of white, purple and red portulacas on either side of the walkway leading to my house, a few hedges, and an exuberant Rose of Sharon shrub.

    Each time I left the house, the flowers would surprise me. They were so out there, bursts of pink that greeted the day and lasted until they closed and fell at night. They didn’t seem to mind that they were growing in a limited space or that they were far from their tropical roots. Each day was new and they made the most of it.

    Now I have my own Rose of Sharon. It was a gift from my daughter’s in-laws who have a yardful at their home. They warned us, though, that it can take over. They were right. We remove any outcroppings we see around the bush but somehow the seeds made their way to the rear of our yard and they are now challenging the privets we have back there. It doesn’t seem to matter that they supposedly prefer full sun (they are in full shade) or that they like well-drained soil (we have marl that can be quite swampy). Sometimes they need reining in but I can’t help admiring them for their joie de vivre.

    It is a boost to my spirit whenever I see them. There are so many reasons in our world to focus on the negative, to allow joy to withdraw or wither. These bushes thrive no matter what and express themselves in beauty and persistence. They are a vibrant life-force, as enticing as I remember. Seems like a good example to follow.

    Being a member of the hibiscus family, Rose of Sharon is easy to grow. Take a look: http://treesandshrubs.about.com/od/commonshrubs/p/RoseofSharon.htm

    ©2011 Ferida Wolff for SeniorWomen.com

    (Editor’s Note: We, too, share Ferida’s love of the Rose of Sharon bush. Ours stood at the far right corner of our plot on Long Island, New York, where we lived as a child. It was the touchstone of our garden, the one that appeared tall and provided a private refuge to sit under. It remains a favored childhood memory, along with the dogwood tree and lilac bush.)