Author: SeniorWomenWeb

  • Ferida Wolff’s Backyard: Fireworks Galore!

    As our communities become more urbanized, the natural features around us tend to get pushed into the background and often go unnoticed. In “Ferida’s Backyard,” I look at the details of nature locally, from a neighborhood perspective, frequently from a backyard vantage point.

    It excites me to share what I see. An awareness of the natural connection can beautifully enhance our lives.

    Fireworks Galore 

    SUNDAY, JULY 3, 2022

     

    Fireworks Galore!

     

    We went to a neighboring town last night to see some pre-4th fireworks. Dusk came and the sky lit up with color! Everyone cheered. A little kid behind us kept pointing to one particular burst saying “That’s my favorite!”

    I remember when I was a little kid, my mother and aunt took me, my sister and cousins to Coney Island to see the Fourth of July fireworks. We stood on the boardwalk eagerly waiting for the first burst to brighten up the sky.  It was something I looked forward to. I loved it. I still do.

    These fireworks were on the early side. Tonight there will be more in a different local town. And then on the actual 4th, we’ll be able to see the official colorful celebration. I hope that this is all a reminder of the freedom that our country stands for.

    May politics be put aside. Let’s see all Americans, regardless of our differences, as one people. And may we all enjoy the brilliance of light and color and connectedness in America.

    ©Ferida Wolff for SeniorWomen.com

     
  • Julia Sneden Wrote: Going Forth On the Fourth After Strict Blackout Conditions and Requisitioned Gunpowder Had Been the Law

     Firework jpg

    by Julia Sneden

     Image: Fireworks by Jon Sullivan, http://pdphoto.org/PictureDetail.php?mat=&pg=5873; Wikimedia

    When my son took his small children to their first fireworks display, he noted that his daughter was more frightened than thrilled. Standing in the dark beneath all those shimmering, falling bits of fire didn’t suit her at all.

    I can understand that perfectly. She was only about five years old, but the first time I saw real fireworks on site, I, too, was terrified — and I was almost eleven. My father and stepmother had taken my brother and me to one of the first displays of fireworks after World War II, thinking it would be a real treat for us. Alas, I hated it.

    Perhaps my reaction was occasioned by having seen one too many wildfires on the hill behind our house. California in summer is, as current news can attest, tinder-dry. Back in 1944, my father spent one long night up on our roof with a hose, protecting us from sparks that blew from the field fire behind the Miller’s hilltop house. The line of eucalyptus trees behind their barn had gone up with a single whoosh, on account of the large amount of oil contained in eucalyptus leaves. Firefighters finally managed to stop the blaze, but not until it had burned Miller’s barn and killed a couple of their horses. It was a terrifying lesson to all of us children that sparks from above weren’t a bit fun.

    Of course during World War II, we kids didn’t know what fireworks were, at least not in Redwood City, California. All forms of gunpowder were requisitioned by the military, and even if fireworks had been available, the entire west coast of this country was under strict blackout conditions. Our windows were covered with black shades at night, and the headlights of all vehicles (including our parents’ car) had black hoods affixed to the top half of the lens. A fireworks display would have been unthinkable.

    We didn’t even have firecrackers, something my older brother and his friends bemoaned. They described to me in great detail the thrill of lighting a string and tossing it into the street. It didn’t sound like much fun to me. I mean, all that noise, and for what? (Come 1947 my suspicions were confirmed: firecrackers were noisy, dangerous, and frightening, especially if you were a little girl who had a big brother and chum who delighted in tossing them near you).

    We did, however, find ways to celebrate the glorious Fourth during the War. In lieu of firecrackers, my mother handed us pot lids, with which we paraded up and down our long driveway, banging them together and shouting “Happy Fourth of July!”

    Redwood City sponsored a Fourth of July parade, featuring our high school’s marching band, replete with drum majorettes twirling batons that flashed in the sun. There were children on bikes with red, white and blue crepe paper woven into the spokes of the wheels, and troops of Boy Scouts marching smartly. Patriotic bunting and American flags were everywhere, and once, someone costumed as Lady Liberty herself marched along, carrying a papier maché torch.

    A small cadre of air-raid wardens wearing white hard hats and arm bands walked stiffly by, a few of them handing out pamphlets that stressed preparedness in case of attack, or listed the regulations regarding local civilian defense. The AWVS ladies marched by carrying signs listing dates for the next blood drive, or proudly announcing the tonnage gathered in the latest scrap metal collection.

    A group of horse-loving men in cowboy shirts, bolo ties, Stetsons, and decorated chaps appeared on their beautiful palominos, the horses sporting tack with lots of silver decorations. And, of course, there was always an Uncle Sam at the end of the parade. At least once he was a stilt-walker of impressive ability (he had to be, walking behind the horses).

  • Dr. Deborah Birx, Former White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, Testifies on Trump Administration’s COVID-19 Response

     Dr. Deborah Birx

    JUNE 23, 2022

    Former White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx testified before the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis about the Trump administration’s pandemic response. She repeated her claim that up to 130,000 deaths were preventable and explained that beginning in April of 2020, there were “parallel streams of data coming into the White House and parallel analyses that I was not privy to.” She named Dr. Scott Atlas, former White House Coronavirus Task Force adviser, as someone who gave former President Trump COVID-19 misinformation, which resulted in unnecessary deaths. Dr. Birx also addressed other issues regarding the Trump administration’s pandemic response, such as White House officials being preoccupied with the 2020 election, misguided data collection amid asymptomatic individuals, and some officials downplaying the pandemic. She also emphasized that too many deaths are still occurring. close  *This text was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

     

      
     
    1:41:12
    POINTS OF INTEREST

    •  
      What Should Have President Trump Done Differently?
    •  
      Was There an Attempt to Consider Herd Immunity?
    •  
      Dr. Birx on Dr. Scott Atlas’ “Dangerous” COVID-19 Views
    •  
      Why Were Efforts to Collect Data Delayed?
    •  
      Can You Speak About Mental Health Issues Resulting From Lockdowns?
    •  
      Dr. Birx’s Views on Dr. Scott Atlas’ Ideas About COVID-19, Including Herd Immunity
    •  
      Dr. Birx on Fmr. President Trump & Injecting Disinfectant to Cure COVID-19
    •  
      Question About Dereliction of Duty Amid Election
    •  
      Exchange Between Rep. Jordan and Dr. Birx on Confusion About the Vaccinated Infected With COVID-19
    •  
      Rep. Raskin on Whether Fmr. Pres. Trump’s Ideas About COVID-19 Were Lies
    •  
      Did Dr. Atlas Have an Impact on Fmr. Pres. Trump’s Pandemic Response?
  • Attorney General Merrick B. Garland Statement on Supreme Court Ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

     Justice department

    Attorney General Merrick B. Garland today released the following statement following the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health, et al. v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization et al.:

    “Today, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey and held that the right to abortion is no longer protected by the Constitution.

    “The Supreme Court has eliminated an established right that has been an essential component of women’s liberty for half a century – a right that has safeguarded women’s ability to participate fully and equally in society. And in renouncing this fundamental right, which it had repeatedly recognized and reaffirmed, the Court has upended the doctrine of stare decisis, a key pillar of the rule of law.

    “The Justice Department strongly disagrees with the Court’s decision. This decision deals a devastating blow to reproductive freedom in the United States. It will have an immediate and irreversible impact on the lives of people across the country. And it will be greatly disproportionate in its effect – with the greatest burdens felt by people of color and those of limited financial means. 

    ***

    “But today’s decision does not eliminate the ability of states to keep abortion legal within their borders. And the Constitution continues to restrict states’ authority to ban reproductive services provided outside their borders.

    “We recognize that traveling to obtain reproductive care may not be feasible in many circumstances. But under bedrock constitutional principles, women who reside in states that have banned access to comprehensive reproductive care must remain free to seek that care in states where it is legal. Moreover, under fundamental First Amendment principles, individuals must remain free to inform and counsel each other about the reproductive care that is available in other states.

    “Advocates with different views on this issue have the right to, and will, voice their opinions. Peacefully expressing a view is protected by the First Amendment. But we must be clear that violence and threats of violence are not. The Justice Department will not tolerate such acts.

    ***

    “The Justice Department will work tirelessly to protect and advance reproductive freedom.

    “Under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, the Department will continue to protect healthcare providers and individuals seeking reproductive health services in states where those services remain legal. This law prohibits anyone from obstructing access to reproductive health services through violence, threats of violence, or property damage. 

    “The Department strongly supports efforts by Congress to codify Americans’ reproductive rights, which it retains the authority to do. We also support other legislative efforts to ensure access to comprehensive reproductive services.

    “And we stand ready to work with other arms of the federal government that seek to use their lawful authorities to protect and preserve access to reproductive care. In particular, the FDA has approved the use of the medication Mifepristone. States may not ban Mifepristone based on disagreement with the FDA’s expert judgment about its safety and efficacy. 

    “Furthermore, federal agencies may continue to provide reproductive health services to the extent authorized by federal law. And federal employees who carry out their duties by providing such services must be allowed to do so free from the threat of liability. It is the Department’s longstanding position that States generally may not impose criminal or civil liability on federal employees who perform their duties in a manner authorized by federal law. Additionally, the Department’s Office of Legal Counsel has determined that federal employees engaging in such conduct would not violate the Assimilative Crimes Act and could not be prosecuted by the federal government under that law. The Justice Department is prepared to assist agencies in resolving any questions about the scope of their authority to provide reproductive care.

    ***

    “The ability to decide one’s own future is a fundamental American value, and few decisions are more significant and personal than the choice of whether and when to have children.

    “Few rights are more central to individual freedom than the right to control one’s own body.

    “The Justice Department will use every tool at our disposal to protect reproductive freedom. And we will not waver from this Department’s founding responsibility to protect the civil rights of all Americans.”

  • IRS: Taxpayers Now Have More Options to Correct, Amend Returns Electronically; Determing the Value of Donated Property

    Issue Number:    IR-2022-130IRS seal

    Inside This Issue


     

    WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service announced today that more forms can now be amended electronically. These include people filing corrections to the Form 1040-NR, U.S. Nonresident Alien Income Tax Return and Forms 1040-SS, U.S. Self-Employment Tax Return (Including the Additional Child Tax Credit for Bona Fide Residents of Puerto Rico) and Forms 1040-PR, Self-Employment Tax Return – Puerto Rico.

    “This initiative has come a long way from 2020 when we first launched the ability to file amended returns, which was an important milestone to help taxpayers and the tax community,” said IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig. “This new feature will further help people needing to make corrections. This development will also assist the IRS with its inventory work on the current backlog of amended returns. This is another tool we’re using to help get us back on track.”

    Additionally, a new, electronic checkbox has been added for Forms 1040/1040-SR, 1040-NR and 1040-SS/1040-PR to indicate that a superseding return is being filed electronically. A superseded return is one that is filed after the originally filed return but submitted before the due date, including extensions.

    Taxpayers can also amend their return electronically if there is change to their filing status or to add a dependent who was previously claimed on another return.

    About 3 million Forms 1040-X are filed by taxpayers each year. Taxpayers can still use the “Where’s My Amended Return?” online tool to check the status of their electronically-filed Form 1040-X.

    Forms 1040, 1040-NR and 1040-SR can still be amended electronically for tax years 2019, 2020 and 2021 along with corrected Forms 1040-SS and Form 1040-PR for tax year 2021.

    In general, taxpayers still have the option to submit a paper version of the Form 1040-X and should follow the instructions for preparing and submitting the paper form.

    The IRS continues to look at this important area, and more enhancements are planned for the future.

    Back to Top

    Editor’s Note: Determining the Value of Donated Property: https://www.irs.gov/publications/p561#d0e556


    FaceBook Logo  YouTube Logo  Instagram Logo  Twitter Logo  LinkedIn Logo


    Thank you for subscribing to the IRS Newswire, an IRS e-mail service.

    If you know someone who might want to subscribe to this mailing list, please forward this message to them so they can subscribe.

  • Testimony of Steve McCraw, Head of the Texas State Police, On the Ulvade Killings

    FULL TESTIMONY: DPS Director Steve McCraw on Uvalde shooting and police response

  • White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse

     Gender Equity and Equality Jennifer Klein

    The Gender Policy Council and National Security Council launched the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse. The Task Force was established through a Presidential Memorandum. Following remarks by Vice President Harris, Attorney General Merrick Garland, and U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, senior Administration officials heard from a panel of survivors and experts, who shared personal stories and recommendations on online harassment and abuse.

    Survivors and experts highlighted the offline impact of online abuse, ranging from psychological distress and additional negative health impacts, to self-censorship, disruptions to education and economic loss, as well as experiences of other forms of physical and sexual violence. Participants noted that online harassment and abuse disproportionately impacts women, girls – especially women and girls of color – and LGBTQI+ individuals.  Participants also provided concrete recommendations to prevent and respond to online harms.   

    Senior Administration officials reaffirmed the Biden-Harris Administration’s commitment to preventing and addressing gender-based violence wherever it occurs, including online. They outlined key actions the Administration is already taking to address online harassment and abuse, and explained that the Task Force will provide a blueprint for action within 180 days with recommendations on additional steps the federal government can take. This blueprint will include a focus on expanding research to better understand the impact and scope of the problem, improving prevention efforts, increasing support for survivors, and strengthening accountability for offenders and technology platforms. Recommendations will also address the nexus between online misogyny, radicalization, and violence. 

    The Task Force will hold roundtables to hear from survivors, advocates, legal experts, law enforcement and other stakeholders in the coming weeks and months.  The Task Force is co-chaired by the White House’s Gender Policy Council and National Security Council and members include Cabinet officials, senior White House leadership, and the heads of department and agencies with policy and programmatic responsibilities key to preventing and addressing online harassment and abuse.  

    External Participants included:

    • Sloane Stephens, U.S. Open Tennis Champion, survivor and mental health advocate
    • Francesca Rossi, survivor and victim advocate/Licensed Clinical Social Worker
    • Matthew Herrick, survivor and advocate
    • Mary Anne Franks, Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, Professor, University of Miami Law School
    • Carrie Goldberg, victim rights attorney
    • Melissa Diaz, Chief, San Diego County District Attorney’s Office Family Protection Division

     

  • “Let’s start at the beginning” … Federal Reserve Post About Lessons Learned on Normalizing Monetary Policy: “Additional insight that only experience can bring”

    June 18, 2022

    Lessons Learned on Normalizing Monetary Policy

    Federal Reserve Governor Christopher J. Waller

    At “Monetary Policy at a Crossroads,” a panel discussion hosted by the Dallas Society for Computational Economics, Dallas, Texas

    In addition to the Federal Reserve’s emergency lending programs, the monetary policy actions taken during this time were deemed extraordinary. We swiftly lowered the target range for the federal funds rate to close to zero — the effective lower bound— and made an open-ended commitment to purchasing securities. It was only the second time that the Fed had taken such dramatic steps. But the first time for these actions was scarcely a decade ago, and there is good reason to think such a response may not be extraordinary anymore. Structural changes in the economy have tended to lower interest rates and limit the room that the Federal Reserve will have to cut rates during a slowdown.2 I hope we never have another two years like 2020 and 2021, but because of the low-interest-rate environment we now face, I believe that even in a typical recession there is a decent chance that we will be considering policy decisions in the future similar to those we made over the past two years. Because of that likelihood, it is especially useful to consider the lessons learned.

    Let’s start at the beginning, when the United States was faced with the economic shock from COVID-19. Over several weeks starting in early March 2020, the FOMC lowered the target range for the federal funds rate to the effective lower bound and began purchasing Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS). Meanwhile, the Fed established numerous liquidity and credit market facilities.3 All these actions were taken to support liquidity in the financial system and keep credit flowing to households, businesses and state and local governments. Asset purchases were undertaken in response to disruptions in financial markets, particularly in the normally stable U.S. Treasury market. Besides supporting smooth market functioning, asset purchases also aided in the transmission of monetary policy to broader financial conditions.

    Financial markets stabilized relatively quickly. Over the course of 2020, the Fed’s liquidity and credit facilities saw reduced demand and most of the emergency programs were decommissioned around year end. Perhaps the most straightforward takeaway for monetary policy is that in times of severe stress, lending facilities, along with sharp cuts to the federal funds rate and the introduction of large-scale asset purchases, are very effective in reviving the economy.

    There are some other lessons, I think, from the experience of tightening monetary policy, a process which was put in motion by the guidance that the FOMC issued in 2020 about how long it would keep the federal funds rate at the effective lower bound and continue asset purchases. In September and December of 2020, the FOMC provided criteria or conditions in the meeting statement that would need to be met before the FOMC would consider raising interest rates and begin to reduce asset purchases, respectively. These conditions were, in effect, the FOMC’s plan for starting the process of tightening policy. This guidance was short term, specific to the task of when to tighten policy in this current cycle, and focused on specific tools.

    Let me make an important distinction here. A bit earlier, in August 2020, the Committee completed a multi-year review of our overall strategy for achieving and sustaining our economic goals. The strategy statement is very different than the tightening guidance — it is about longer-run goals, not specific actions related to the current circumstances. The goals in the strategy statement apply in all economic circumstances and don’t include any details on the settings of policy tools. I mention this distinction because some have argued that the FOMC’s new strategy was a factor that led the Committee to wait too long to begin tightening monetary policy. A bit later, I will explain why I do not believe this is the case, and I will explain how the guidance for tightening policy, laid out in the FOMC’s post-meeting statements, was the basis for our decisions.

  • Images of Screwdrivers, Lockpicks, Business Cards, Surgical Gloves, a Room Key for the Watergate, the Now-infamous ChapStick Microphone: Watergate Trial Records Digitized Ahead of Scandal’s 50th Anniversary

    Prior to the digitization project, the trial records were open in full and available for viewing in person at the National Archives at College Park. The artifacts were not easily accessible, however. 

    Making the new images of the holdings also posed logistical issues.Ellsberg Filing Cabinet

    “Artifact photography can present unique challenges, which require on-set problem-solving to find the best way to position and photograph an individual item,” said Digital Imaging Specialist Jennifer Seitz, who was responsible for photographing the Liddy trial exhibits.

    To that end, the Liddy trial exhibits were photographed using a high-resolution studio setup at the National Archives at College Park.

    “In this case, some handling and condition issues limited the possibility to get the clearest or most visually appealing images — items bound tightly by string, objects with plastic coverings, or the presence of exhibit tags,” Seitz explained. “We attempted to get the best images possible while leaving the original condition undisturbed. In most cases, multiple views of each artifact were captured in order to provide our researchers with the most complete view possible when viewing the item in the Catalog.”

    In addition to the newly digitized records, more research and documents related to the Watergate scandal are available through the Richard M. Nixon Presidential Library and Museum.

    The filing cabinet of the psychiatrist of Nixon administration “enemy” Daniel Ellsberg who leaked the Pentagon Papers, broken into by Liddy and others in 1971, on display in the Smithsonian National Museum of American History

    An overview of the Records of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force is also available.

     For the first time since the Watergate scandal broke nearly 50 years ago, the paper records, exhibits, and artifacts from the United States v. G. Gordon Liddy trial are digitized and available to view in the National Archives Catalog.

    new website serves as a portal to browse the newly digitized records as the country marks the 50th anniversary of the break-in on June 17, 1972, an event that rocked the U.S. political landscape and led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon.

    Among the records are images of screwdrivers, lockpicks, business cards, surgical gloves, a room key for the Watergate, and the now-infamous ChapStick microphone.  chapstick microphone

    “Our staff worked diligently in recent months to expand access to these records,” said Amber Forrester, communications coordinator for the agency’s Research Services office. “We wanted to ensure some of our highest-profile documents are easily viewable by any researchers or interested members of the public through the National Archives Catalog.”

  • Federal Reserve issues FOMC statement; Overall Economic Activity, Job Gains and Inflation: “The Committee is strongly committed to returning inflation to its 2 percent objective.” 

    June 15, 2022 

    Overall economic activity appears to have picked up after edging down in the first quarter. Job gains have been robust in recent months, and the unemployment rate has remained low. Inflation remains elevated, reflecting supply and demand imbalances related to the pandemic, higher energy prices, and broader price pressures.

    The invasion of Ukraine by Russia is causing tremendous human and economic hardship. The invasion and related events are creating additional upward pressure on inflation and are weighing on global economic activity. In addition, COVID-related lockdowns in China are likely to exacerbate supply chain disruptions. The Committee is highly attentive to inflation risks.

    The Committee seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run. In support of these goals, the Committee decided to raise the target range for the federal funds rate to 1‑1/2 to 1-3/4 percent and anticipates that ongoing increases in the target range will be appropriate. In addition, the Committee will continue reducing its holdings of Treasury securities and agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities, as described in the Plans for Reducing the Size of the Federal Reserve’s Balance Sheet that were issued in May. The Committee is strongly committed to returning inflation to its 2 percent objective.

    In assessing the appropriate stance of monetary policy, the Committee will continue to monitor the implications of incoming information for the economic outlook. The Committee would be prepared to adjust the stance of monetary policy as appropriate if risks emerge that could impede the attainment of the Committee’s goals. The Committee’s assessments will take into account a wide range of information, including readings on public health, labor market conditions, inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and financial and international developments.

    Voting for the monetary policy action were Jerome H. Powell, Chair; John C. Williams, Vice Chair; Michelle W. Bowman; Lael Brainard; James Bullard; Lisa D. Cook; Patrick Harker; Philip N. Jefferson; Loretta J. Mester; and Christopher J. Waller. Voting against this action was Esther L. George, who preferred at this meeting to raise the target range for the federal funds rate by 0.5 percentage point to 1-1/4 percent to 1-1/2 percent. Patrick Harker voted as an alternate member at this meeting.

    Implementation Note issued June 15, 2022

    Implementation Note issued June 15, 2022