
Author: SeniorWomenWeb
-
Jo Freeman Writes: Why There Is a Run-Off Election in Georgia on December 6th
By Jo Freeman
Georgia is one of only two states to require that elections be won by at least 50 percent of the vote. Neither Democrat Raphael Warnock nor Republican Herschel Walker received the necessary 50 percent in the November general election, when only 57 percent of Georgia voters cast a ballot. It’s ironic that both are Black men because the original purpose of the requirement for an absolute majority was to keep any Black person from being elected to high office. An electoral procedure crafted to keep Blacks out of higher office now requires that Georgia voters choose between two Black men to be their US Senator. In August of 2021 former NFL player Herschel Walker moved his residence from Texas to Georgia so he could run in the Republican primary for Senate. That’s why there will be a run-off election in Georgia on December 6.Prior to 1960, Georgia had a very complex system for selecting winners of the Democratic primary that favored small rural counties. Since the Democrat inevitably won in November, it sometimes happened that candidates for statewide office who had won a bare plurality of the state primary vote would win the office. It was even possible to win a majority of the popular vote in the primary and still lose the nomination if that vote was from the urban counties. The federal court invalidated this system in 1962. In 1964 the legislature revised the election code, both to conform to the federal court decisions and to bring all of the disparate election laws on the books into one title. At that time, Blacks were almost 30 percent of the state population but barely 15 percent of all voters.A good deal of public and private debate took place on how to limit the black vote. It was called the “bloc vote” on the assumption that all Blacks would vote as a bloc for whomever their leaders designated. The requirement that candidates receive a majority of votes cast in a primary to win nomination was extended to all state offices, necessitating run-offs. The purpose was to keep Blacks from winning an election if too many white candidates split the white vote. A run-off would allow the white majority to coalesce behind the most popular white candidate. At that time, the only primary was for the Democratic nomination; the Republicans nominated their candidates at conventions until 1970.Over the next few decades Georgia became a purple state. Most whites left the Democratic Party as most Blacks became registered voters who favored the Democratic Party. Run-off elections became partisan as well as racial. The percentage required to win without a run-off was lowered to 45 percent, then raised again to 50 percent in 2005. Party competition meant that whichever party gained control of the state legislature altered the law to favor its candidates.In 2020 Blacks were roughly a third of all voters, but enough whites voted Democratic to elect two Democratic Senators – in a January run-off. The state legislature remained under Republican control. After the 2020 Census, Georgia kept its 14 Representatives to the US House though it did alter some of the district lines. After the 2022 election, it still has 8 Republicans and 6 Democrats. All the Republicans are white but only one of the Democrats.In August of 2021 former NFL player Herschel Walker moved his residence from Texas to Georgia so he could run in the Republican primary for Senate. He was encouraged to do this by former President Donald Trump and several national Republican leaders. They believed that a prominent Black man had a better chance of beating Democratic incumbent Raphael Warnock than anyone else. Walker won the primary, but there were three candidates in the November 8 general election. The Libertarian candidate got 2 percent of the vote. Walker received 48.49 percent and Raphael Warnock got 49.44 percent.An electoral procedure crafted to keep Blacks out of higher office now requires that Georgia voters choose between two Black men to be their US Senator. That’s why there will be a run-off election in Georgia on December 6.Copyright © 2022 by Jo FreemanThe initial part of this article is based on her manuscript Tell It Like It Is: Living History in the Southern Civil Rights Movement, 1965-66. She’s still looking for a publisher. -
Rose Madeline Mula Writes: Brad Pitt and Me
Don’t be misled by the title. Brad Pitt is not my new boy toy.
Our connection is that I recently learned that he and I have something in common. Unfortunately, it’s not fame, fortune, talent or good looks. It’s a malady called Prosopagnosia. No, wait! You don’t have to move six feet away. It’s not contagious. And it’s not terminal. Unless one can actually die of embarrassment.
Prosopagnosia is face blindness, an inability to recognize people you’ve met before — in some cases, very good friends and sometimes even family members, especially when you see these people unexpectedly or in out-of-context environments. It’s extremely embarrassing.
“I know what you mean,” you say. “I don’t remember names.” Please! There is no comparison.
Say you’re shopping at Market Basket or Dunkin’ Donuts and in walk your Aunt Matilda and your friend Betsy who beat you at Scrabble last night. You immediately say “Hi!” — even if for some reason, their names escape you at the moment — and start chatting.
What might I do in a similar situation? Ignore them completely and just walk by, leaving Betsy to think I’m a very poor sport and upset by my Scrabble loss, while Aunt Matilda makes a mental note to reconsider her will.
No, that’s not an exaggeration, though I realize it’s hard to believe. And, no, it’s not related to aging. I’ve had this affliction since childhood, and I learned only recently that it is an actual condition, shared by relatively few, that has a scientific name.
It does help a bit to know I am not alone. I read that Brad often foregoes invitations to large parties where he knows he would inadvertently snub and risk offending many good friends.
I feel his pain. I wrote him (a letter which I’m sure he will never see) that in the highly unlikely event our paths should ever cross, I know he will understand if I don’t recognize him.
Meanwhile I continue to cope by relying on secondary characteristics — voices, mannerisms, hair styles… Also, I identify many of my neighbors in my condo building by their dogs when I see them together. Yes, I do recognize furry, four-legged creatures; and, thankfully, I am able to associate each one with its proper owner. But if you don’t have a dog — or purple
dreadlocks — please don’t be upset if I don’t recognize you the next time we meet.I am hoping that Brad Pitt’s admission to being a victim of this curse will help publicize it so people will better understand.
Maybe you could spread the word, too. Most likely no one will believe you, but it’s worth a shot.
©2022 Rose Madeline Mula for SeniorWomen.com
-
Women’s Congressional Policy, Weekly Legislative Update November 21, 2022; Bills Introduced: November 14-18, 2022
Bringing women policymakers together across party lines to advance
issues of importance to women and their families.
Weekly Legislative Update
November 21, 2022
Bills Introduced: November 14-18, 2022
Right, Senator Lisa Murkowski
Family Support
H.R. 9319 — Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD)/Agriculture (11/16/22) — A bill to provide for the reissuance to households Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to replace benefits stolen by identity theft or typical skimming practices, and for other purposes.
H.R. 9323 — Rep. Nydia Velazquez (D-NY)/Oversight and Reform (11/16/22) — A bill to establish a task force on child and family economic security and stability for economic growth.
S. 5116 — Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS)/Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry (11/17/22)—A bill to require the authorization of frozen fruits and vegetables under the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC).
Human Trafficking
S. 9 — Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)/Judiciary (11/17/22)—A bill to provide for the vacating of certain convictions and expungement of certain arrests of victims of human trafficking.
International
H.R. 9291 — Rep. Andre Carson (D-IN)/Foreign Affairs (11/14/22)—A bill to require a report on the death of Shireen Abu Akleh.
S. Con. Res. 49 — Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT)/Foreign Relations (11/17/22)—A concurrent resolution expressing support for the Geneva Consensus Declaration on Promoting Women’s Health and Strengthening the Family and urging that the United States be added as a signatory.
Violence Against Women
S. 5087 — Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)/Indian Affairs (11/15/22)—A bill to extend, and provide additional support for the activities of the Department of the Interior and the Department of Justice Joint Commission on Reducing Violent Crime Against Indians, and for other purposes.
Women’s History
S. 5079 — Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)/Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (11/14/22)—A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 202 2nd Avenue in Oklee, Minnesota, as the “Coya Knutson Post Office.”
H.R. 9308 — Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-CA)/Oversight and Reform (11/17/22)—A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6401 El Cajon Boulevard in San Diego, California, as the “Susan A. Davis Post Office.”
-
Statement by President Joe Biden On Speaker Nancy Pelosi Stepping Down from Democratic Leadership in the House of Representatives; “When I think of Nancy Pelosi, I think of dignity”
When I think of Nancy Pelosi, I think of dignity.
History will note she is the most consequential Speaker of the House of Representatives in our history. There are countless examples of how she embodies the obligation of elected officials to uphold their oath to God and country to ensure our democracy delivers and remains a beacon to the world. In everything she does, she reflects a dignity in her actions and a dignity she sees in the lives of the people of this nation.
In 2007, she made history as the first woman Speaker, but that was just the beginning of the history she has made during her four terms. I know because I’ve seen her in action during my career as Senator, Vice President, and now as President. With Nancy, you see a father’s daughter who learned by his side how to win and govern. With her leading the way, you never worry about whether a bill will pass. If she says she has the votes, she has the votes. Every time.
History will record her leadership with President Obama to rescue the economy in crisis from the Great Recession. With her sheer will, passing the Affordable Care Act to ensure health care is a right not a privilege. Ending Don’t Ask Don’t Tell so patriotic Americans can serve the country they love no matter who they love. The list goes on, including her leadership in defending democracy and advancing human rights around the world.Jo Freeman Reviews Thank You For Your Servitude: Donald Trump’s Washington and the Price of Submission
Jo Freeman reviews:
Thank You for Your Servitude: Donald Trump’s Washington and the Price of Submission
By Mark LeibovichPublished by New York: Penguin Press, 2022, 339 pages, $29 hardcoverThis spooky, scary season is a good time to read Leibovich’s spooky, scary book. Mostly anecdotal, it portrays otherwise sane people who descended into “servitude as they made their deals and swallowed their pride.” Truly scary.A long-time Washington correspondent for major publications, Leibovich writes “from the view of the Trump Hotel, if not always physically,” as he describes the many Republican politicians who despised Trump, but became his lackeys. The Trump Hotel refers to the Old Post Office Building at 1100 Pennsylvania Ave. which opened as the Trump International Hotel in September of 2016. A few months later the owner of “DJT Holdings, LLC” began his “side hustle.”In snappy language with prodigious puns, Leibovich paints a picture of King Trump and his Servants. Or were they Nannies, charged with keeping the Royal Toddler happy, while cleaning up his messes? Leibovich describes a particularly revealing Cabinet meeting a few months into 2017, where the “Alpha Lapdogs” competed to pay homage to the boss. Mike Pence “was the unquestioned maestro of this top-level symphony of sycophancy” showing that DJT had chosen “the perfect doormat” when he asked Pence to be his VP. Pence “stood by his man in the most nakedly servile of ways.” Only one Secretary said something else; it wasn’t negative (heaven forbid!) but Trump was noticeably unhappy.Not all the Trumpsters were elected officials needing a pat on the head to feel fulfilled. Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani was the “master creature of the Trump Swamp.” Reince Priebus was a “zookeeper”for the six months he was Chief of Staff. Jeff Sessions gave up a safe Alabama Senate seat he had held for 20 years to become Trump’s first Attorney General. Trump eventually fired the “dumb Southerner.”Then there are the lies. We’ve all learned that Trump lives in a fantasy world in which he is the biggest and best at everything. Leibovich describes how he pulled everyone else into that world, over and over again.Having studied politics and politicians for sixty years, I know that they all lie. They lie because they have to lie to get and keep their jobs. But the normal range of political lies is one Pinocchio. Normal for Trump was four Pinocchios. Under his tutelage, that became the norm for those who served him.GAO: Weapon System Sustainment: Aircraft Mission Capable Goals Were Generally Not Met and Sustainment Costs Varied by Aircraft
Weapon System Sustainment: Aircraft Mission Capable Goals Were Generally Not Met and Sustainment Costs Varied by Aircraft; GAO-23-106217 Published: Nov 10, 2022. Publicly Released: Nov 10, 2022.
Fast Facts
The Department of Defense spends tens of billions of dollars annually to sustain its aircraft fleets. But how many of those aircraft are ready for takeoff and able to complete missions?
We looked at 49 types of military aircraft and found that only 4 types met their annual mission readiness goals from FY 2011 through FY 2021 — an overall decline over time. Program officials gave us various reasons for these results, including aging aircraft, maintenance challenges, and issues with getting parts and supplies.
We also reviewed the costs of sustaining these aircraft — which varied by aircraft type and age, fleet size, and number of flying hours. An Air Force F-22 Raptor Lit for Night Maintenance in Virginia; An Air Force F-22 Raptor in a lighted hangar at night.
What GAO Found
GAO examined 49 aircraft and found that only four met their annual mission capable goal in a majority of the years from fiscal years 2011 through 2021. As shown below, 26 aircraft did not meet their annual mission capable goal in any fiscal year. The mission capable rate — the percentage of total time when the aircraft can fly and perform at least one mission — is used to assess the health and readiness of an aircraft fleet.
Number of Years Selected Aircraft Met Their Annual Mission Capable Goal, Fiscal Years 2011 through 2021
a. For this aircraft, the military department did not provide a mission capable goal for all eleven years. Comparing fiscal year 2011 to fiscal year 2021, the average mission capable rate for the selected aircraft has fallen for the Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps, to varying degrees. The average mission capable rate for the selected Army aircraft has risen. For fiscal year 2021, GAO found that only two of the 49 aircraft examined met the service-established mission capable goal. More specifically, for fiscal year 2021, 30 aircraft were more than 10 percentage points below the mission capable goal in fiscal year 2021; and 17 aircraft were 10 percentage points or less below the mission capable goal in fiscal year 2021. Many of the selected aircraft are facing one or more sustainment challenges, as shown below. According to program officials, these challenges have an effect on mission capable rates.
Sustainment Challenges Affecting Some of the Selected Department of Defense Aircraft
Operating and support (O&S) costs totaled about $54 billion in fiscal year 2020 for the reviewed aircraft — a decrease of about $2.9 billion since fiscal year 2011 after factoring in inflation using constant fiscal year 2020 dollars. Maintenance costs became a larger portion of O&S costs — increasing by $1.2 billion since fiscal year 2011. Air Force and Army O&S costs have decreased, while Navy and Marine Corps O&S costs have increased. Based on our analysis and information provided by the program offices, these trends have largely been driven by changes in the size of aircraft inventory and reduced flying hours. Additionally, O&S costs have varied widely across aircraft fleets. For example, the total fiscal year 2020 O&S costs for the systems we reviewed ranged from about $97 million for the KC-130T fleet (Navy and Marine Corps) to a high of about $4.3 billion for the F-16 fleet (Air Force). Based on our analysis and information provided by the system program offices, cost variances were based on aircraft type and factors such as age of the fleet, the number of aircraft included in the inventory, and the number of flying hours flown by a fleet.
Why GAO Did This Study
The Department of Defense (DOD) spends tens of billions of dollars annually to sustain its weapon systems in an effort to ensure that these systems are available to simultaneously support today’s military operations and maintain the capability to meet future defense requirements. This report provides observations on mission capable rates and costs to operate and sustain 49 fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force. GAO initiated this work in response to continuing interest in the operational availability and O&S costs for major weapon systems. We also initiated this work as part of our response to a provision in section 802 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 for GAO to report on sustainment reviews conducted by the military services, with a specific focus on O&S cost growth. In addition to this report, GAO plans to issue additional reports in response to the provision. GAO reviewed documentation and interviewed program office officials to identify reasons for the trends in mission capability rates and O&S costs as well as any challenges in sustaining the aircraft.
For more information, contact Diana Maurer at 202-512-9627 or maurerd@gao.gov.
Full Report Highlights Page (2 pages)
Full Report (352 pages)
GAO Contacts Diana Maurer Director MaurerD@gao.gov
(202) 512-9627 Multimedia Mission-readiness of DOD Aircraft Mission-readiness of DOD Aircraft THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2022
A Wealth of Records Held by the National Archives That Document US Military Encounters From the 18th Century
Honoring Our Veterans
November 11 marks the annual observance of Veterans Day, a day on which we honor the courageous women and men who have served in the United States military.
Image from Records of the Office of Government Reports, 1932 – 1947, World War II Posters, 1942 – 1945, “Woman’s Place in War Weather Observer The Women’s Army Corps.” National Archives Identifier 513708
The National Archives is proud to have in its holdings a variety of military records, from photos to documents to searchable databases, which are available on National Archives News. NARA’s holdings regarding veterans and military records include:
- Veterans’ Service Records
- Genealogy Research in Military Records
- American Revolution
- Civil War Records
- World War I and World War II Records
We invite you to explore the wealth of records held by the National Archives that document U.S. military encounters from the 18th century through the 20th century, including the Veterans Day Military History roundup on the Unwritten Record blog, Eleven Military Stories Honoring Veterans at the National Archives from National Archives News, and our Veterans Day Resources on archives.gov.
Photographs of U.S. Army Operations in Vietnam, 1963 – 1973, Vietnam — Units — 101st Airborne Division-1966, Soldiers of the 327th Infantry, 101st Airborne Brigade, prepare to move across a rice field, 1/23/1966. National Archives Identifier 100310304
Start your research on History Hub
Have a question? Find your answer on History Hub!
From Navy Deck Logs to Army Unit Histories, History Hub’s Military Records Community covers a variety of military and veterans-related topics, including:
Check out our recent newsletter for more details, information, and instructions about using History Hub for your research.
Citizen Archivists, there’s a group just for you! You can share tips and strategies, find new challenges, and get support for your work. Get started with our poll: What kinds of records do you like to transcribe?
Make History Hub your first stop! You can ask—or answer—questions on History Hub, or see if your question has already been answered.
Questions or comments? Email us at catalog@nara.gov
National Archives and Records Administration
8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, Maryland
Note from Seniorwomen.com Editor Tam Martinides Gray: Vietnam War | National Archives
https://www.archives.gov › research › vietnam-warThe National Archives has a wealth of records and information documenting the U.S. experience in the Vietnam conflict. These include photographs, textual …Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Issues Guidance to Address Shoddy Investigation Practices by Consumer Reporting Companies
When consumer reporting companies and furnishers fail to investigate disputed information, consumers are left paying higher interest rates and face greater difficulty finding housing, employment
Today, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued a circular to affirm that neither consumer reporting companies nor information furnishers can skirt dispute investigation requirements. The circular outlines how federal and state consumer protection enforcers, including regulators and attorneys general, can bring claims against companies that fail to investigate and resolve consumer report disputes. The CFPB has found that consumer reporting companies and some furnishers have failed to conduct reasonable investigations of consumer disputes and to spend the time necessary to get to the bottom of inaccuracies. These failures can affect, among other things, people’s eligibility for loans and interest rates, for insurance, and for rental housing and employment.
“One wrong piece of information on a person’s credit report can have destructive consequences that follow a consumer for years,” said CFPB Director Rohit Chopra. “Companies that fail to properly address consumer disputes in accordance with the law may face serious consequences.”
When people identify inaccurate information on their consumer report, they can dispute it with the consumer reporting company. However, that important right is dependent on consumer reporting companies and furnishers conducting complete investigations. The CFPB’s supervisory exams suggest that consumer reporting companies do not always live up to their investigatory responsibilities. In some cases, the CFPB found consumer reporting companies ignored the results of their investigations and simply deleted disputed tradelines instead of correcting inaccurate information. Consumer complaints received by the CFPB highlight similar problems. In fact, inaccurate information and failures to investigate are the two most common consumer reporting complaints received by the CFPB.
Consumer reporting companies are required to investigate all disputes that are not frivolous or irrelevant. Consumer reporting companies and furnishers may be liable under the Fair Credit Reporting Act if they fail to investigate relevant disputes, and claims can be pursued by both state and federal consumer protection enforcers and regulators. Specific responsibilities for the investigations include:
- Consumer reporting companies must promptly provide to the furnisher all relevant information regarding a person’s dispute: After a person disputes the accuracy or completeness of information in their file, the consumer reporting company must notify the entity that originally furnished the information within five business days. In addition, the consumer reporting company must give the furnisher all relevant information provided by the individual.
- Consumer reporting companies and furnishers may not limit a person’s dispute rights: Consumer reporting companies and furnishers must reasonably investigate disputes received directly from individuals. For furnishers, they must reasonably investigate all indirect disputes received from consumer reporting companies. These requirements remain in place even if a person does not include or use the entity’s preferred format, intake forms, or documentation.
Consumer Financial Protection Circulars, such as the one published today, are intended to promote consistency in approach across the various federal and state enforcement agencies and regulators. They are also intended to provide transparency to partner agencies regarding the CFPB’s intended approach when cooperating in enforcement actions. The circulars provide background information about applicable law, articulate considerations relevant to the CFPB’s exercise of its authorities, and, in the interest of maintaining consistency, advise other parties with authority to enforce federal consumer financial protection law.
A la Frank Sinatra: “Come Fly With Me”, U.S. Department of Transportation Airline Customer Service Dashboard
U.S. Department of Transportation Airline Customer Service Dashboard
The U.S. Department of Transportation has created a dashboard to ensure the traveling public has easy access to information about services that U.S. airlines provide to mitigate passenger inconveniences when the cause of a cancellation or delay was due to circumstances within the airline’s control. A green check mark on the dashboard means an airline has committed to providing that service or amenity to its customers. A red “x” means the airline has not made that commitment. However, airlines with a red “x” may provide these services and amenities in some instances in their discretion.
Please click this link for an alternative text version of the dashboard.
These ten large U.S. airlines and their regional operating partners, which operate flights for them but do not sell tickets, account for approximately 96 percent of the domestic scheduled passenger air traffic.
Use the above dashboard to learn about the amenities that the U.S. airline that you are flying on has promised to provide should there be a controllable flight cancellation or delay. You can also use the dashboard to compare amenities that the airlines commit to provide in the event of a controllable flight cancellation or delay when deciding which airline to fly.
A controllable flight cancellation or delay is essentially a delay or cancellation caused by the airline. Examples include: maintenance or crew problems; cabin cleaning; baggage loading; and fueling.
Airlines are required to adhere to the promises that they make in their customer service plan, including commitments to care for customers in the event of controllable delays or cancellations. The Department will hold airlines accountable if they fail to do so.
Remember these commitments do not impact your entitlement to a refund. If an airline cancels a passenger’s flight or makes a significant change in the flight, regardless of the reason, airlines are required to provide a prompt refund to a ticketed passenger, including those with non-refundable tickets, should the passenger choose not to accept the alternative offered, such as rebooking on another flight. Learn more about your right to a refund. If you have a problem obtaining a refund that you believe that you are entitled to receive, you may file a complaint with the DOT. If you are an airline passenger with a disability looking for more information regarding your rights during air travel, please follow this link to our disability webpage.
See below for detailed information about airline customer service commitment plans.
Airlines’ Customer Service Plans
Justice Department to Monitor Polls in 24 States for Compliance with Federal Voting Rights Laws
JUSTICE NEWS
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEMonday, November 7, 2022The Justice Department announced today its plans to monitor compliance with federal voting rights laws in 64 jurisdictions in 24 states for the Nov. 8, 2022 general election. Since the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Civil Rights Division has regularly monitored elections in the field in jurisdictions around the country to protect the rights of voters. The Civil Rights Division will also take complaints from the public nationwide regarding possible violations of the federal voting rights laws through its call center. The Civil Rights Division enforces the federal voting rights laws that protect the rights of all citizens to access the ballot.
For the general election, the Civil Rights Division will monitor for compliance with the federal voting rights laws on Election Day and/or in early voting in 64 jurisdictions:
- City of Bethel, Alaska;
- Dillingham Census Area, Alaska;
- Kusilvak Census Area, Alaska;
- Sitka City-Borough, Alaska;
- Maricopa County, Arizona;
- Navajo County, Arizona;
- Pima County, Arizona;
- Pinal County, Arizona;
- Yavapai County, Arizona;
- Newton County, Arkansas;
- Los Angeles County, California;
- Sonoma County, California;
- Broward County, Florida;
- Miami-Dade County, Florida;
- Palm Beach County, Florida;
- Cobb County, Georgia;
- Fulton County, Georgia;
- Gwinnett County, Georgia;
- Town of Clinton, Massachusetts;
- City of Everett, Massachusetts;
- City of Fitchburg, Massachusetts;
- City of Leominster, Massachusetts;
- City of Malden, Massachusetts;
- City of Methuen, Massachusetts;
- City of Randolph, Massachusetts;
- City of Salem, Massachusetts;
- Prince George’s County, Maryland;
- City of Detroit, Michigan;
- City of Flint, Michigan;
- City of Grand Rapids, Michigan;
- City of Pontiac, Michigan;
- City of Southfield, Michigan;
- City of Minneapolis, Minnesota;
- Hennepin County, Minnesota;
- Ramsey County, Minnesota;
- Cole County, Missouri;
- Alamance County, North Carolina;
- Columbus County, North Carolina;
- Harnett County, North Carolina;
- Mecklenburg County, North Carolina;
- Wayne County, North Carolina;
- Middlesex County, New Jersey;
- Bernalillo County, New Mexico;
- San Juan County, New Mexico;
- Clark County, Nevada;
- Washoe County, Nevada;
- Queens County, New York;
- Cuyahoga County, Ohio;
- Berks County, Pennsylvania;
- Centre County, Pennsylvania;
- Lehigh County, Pennsylvania;
- Luzerne County, Pennsylvania;
- Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania;
- City of Pawtucket, Rhode Island;
- Horry County, South Carolina;
- Dallas County, Texas;
- Harris County, Texas;
- Waller County, Texas;
- San Juan County, Utah;
- City of Manassas, Virginia;
- City of Manassas Park, Virginia;
- Prince William County, Virginia;
- City of Milwaukee, Wisconsin; and,
- City of Racine, Wisconsin.