Author: SeniorWomenWeb

  • Protecting the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Oil and Gas Development in This Area Would Permanently and Irreversibly Disrupt the Ecological Integrity of the Refuge

    From the National Wildlife Refuge Association

    For 37 years, the Refuge Association has fought to keep this refuge closed to oil and gas development. In landmark 1980 legislation, an agreement was struck to open Prudhoe Bay for oil and gas exploitation and to expand the Arctic Refuge to 19.6 million acres and to create a vast wilderness area. In the coastal plain of the refuge, Congress mandated a study to determine whether the area should be wilderness or opened for oil and gas development. While there is oil in the coastal plain, experts agree that oil and gas development in this area would permanently and irreversibly disrupt the ecological integrity of the refuge.  

    Polar bears | Gary Kramer/USFWSPolar bears | Gary Kramer/USFWS

    What Makes the Arctic Refuge So Special?

    Abundant Wildlife
    The Arctic Refuge is home to an incredible array of biodiversity. While the Arctic Refuge is perhaps best known for its resident polar bears, this landscape is also one of the few places on Earth where polar, brown (grizzly), and black bears can be found coexisting.

    Polar bears could possibly go extinct in our lifetimes. Only 30,000 or so bears exist today, and roughly 50 bears come into the Arctic Refuge each year in September, with denning beginning in the late fall. These bears are part of the Southern Beaufort Sea population, which numbers about 900 animals. The USFWS says the Arctic Refuge is the only national conservation area where polar bears regularly den and the most consistently used polar bear land denning area in Alaska. The refuge is critical habitat for these animals, particularly as concerns mount over species loss due to the reduction of sea ice due to climate change.

    More than 200 species of birds utilize the Arctic Refuge, and whether or not you have visited the refuge, odds are good that you have seen one of these migratory species in your own backyard. Birds migrate from the Arctic Refuge to every state and territory in the United States, and some even venture to other continents! This remote corner of Alaska is truly connected to all ends of the Earth.

    Hundreds of thousands of caribou roam the Arctic Refuge, comprised of several distinct herds. The Porcupine Caribou Herd, the largest within the Arctic Refuge, returns to the refuge?s Coastal Plain each spring to calve and raise their young. It is this Coastal Plain, also known as the “1002 Area”, which would become the site of drilling operations were to proceed in the refuge.

    Along with the species mentioned above, wolves, muskoxen, and a multitude of other species of wildlife can be found in the Arctic Refuge. For a more completelist, check out the US Fish and Wildlife Service’s website.

    Arctic National Wildlife Refuge | Steve Chase/USFWSArctic National Wildlife Refuge | Steve Chase/USFWS

    Wild and Untouched Landscape
    Approximately eight million acres of the 19.6 million-acre Arctic Refuge has been congressionally designated as wilderness. A wilderness designation under the Wilderness Act of 1964 is the highest level of land protection that can be awarded to our public lands, and is reserved only for the wildest and pristine landscapes that remain “untrammeled by man.”

  • For Addicted Doctors, Confidential Treatment That Works

    By Christine Vestal, Stateline

    Dr. Michael Wilkerson

    Dr. Michael Wilkerson discusses a patient’s case with a nurse at a Bradford Health Services addiction treatment facility in Warrior, Alabama. When doctors become addicted to drugs or alcohol, confidential state programs must balance doctors’ welfare and patient safety. © The Pew Charitable Trusts

    The day Dr. Arthur Green (not his real name) checked into his rustic cabin here at Bradford Health Services, he said he doubted he could beat his decadeslong struggle with alcohol and find joy again in treating patients. Three weeks later, he said, he was convinced otherwise.

    For Dr. Mary Waters (not her real name), it took six weeks to see a way out of her depression, anxiety and addiction to prescription painkillers. But now she says she’s confident and excited to return to practice.

    They are among hundreds of physicians from across the country who come to this quiet, pine-shaded retreat 25 miles north of Birmingham, where they can get mental health and addiction treatment without jeopardizing their medical licenses.

    Bradford’s addiction treatment regimen isn’t unique ? more than a dozen other addiction centers across the country offer similar programs but when combined with other services offered by state organizations known as physician health programs, it is extraordinarily effective.

    Studies have found that these confidential programs have about an 80 percent success rate, far higher than the typical success rate of 50 percent for the general population. Researchers believe its rewards-based strategy and extensive follow-up care could help many more of the roughly 20 million Americans who suffer from opioid and other drug and alcohol addictions.

    The average person who is addicted to opioids and other substances relapses multiple times before maintaining long-term sobriety, even when treated with highly effective addiction medications and evidence-based behavioral therapies. In an opioid epidemic that is killing more than 170 Americans every day, finding effective addiction treatment can make the difference between life and death.

  • From FactCheck.org: Trump Nixed Gun-Control Rule: The Obama administration estimated that the reporting requirement would cover “approximately 75,000 people each year who have a documented mental health issue”

     Pres Elect Trump and President Obama
    President Barack Obama meets with President-elect Donald Trump in the Oval Office, Nov. 10, 2016. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)
    Q: Did President Donald Trump repeal a rule that aims to block some people with mental disorders from buying guns?

    A: Yes. The Social Security Administration is no longer required to submit the names of certain mentally disabled beneficiaries to a federal agency that conducts gun background checks.

    FULL QUESTION: Is it true that President Obama passed a bill that prohibited mentally ill people from purchasing a gun and that President Trump rescinded this bill?

    FULL ANSWER:  The deadly mass shooting in Las Vegas has again brought attention to legislation signed by President Donald Trump that eliminated a Social Security Administration reporting requirement regarding beneficiaries deemed to have a mental impairment.

    FactCheck.org readers have asked about the measure, and comedian Jimmy Kimmel referenced it during the opening monologue of his nightly talk show on Oct. 2.

    “President Trump spoke this morning, he said he was praying for those who lost their lives,” an emotional Kimmel said. “You know, in February, he also signed a bill that made it easier for people with severe mental illness to buy guns legally.”

    The late-night host was referring to H.J.Res. 40, which became law on Feb. 28.

    That joint resolution didn’t affect “all people with severe mental illness”, as Kimmel’s comment may have suggested. It rescinded a Social Security Administration rule requiring the agency to report to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System disability applicants unable to manage their finances due to a mental health condition.

    The rule applied to “a narrow group of people who have been determined by the Social Security Administration to lack the capacity, on the basis of a mental disorder, to manage their affairs, specifically their benefit payments,” wrote Lindsay Nichols, federal policy director for the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, in testimony to Congress in February 2017.

    First, let’s look at how the background check system ? which was launched in November 1998 ? works.

    Under federal law, individuals “committed to any mental institution” or “adjudicated as a mental defective” by a court, board, commission or other lawful authority are prohibited from purchasing or possessing a gun.

    Adjudicated as a mental defective means people who ?  “as a result of marked subnormal intelligence, mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease”  ? lack the mental capacity to manage their own affairs, or are a danger to themselves or someone else. It also includes people found insane by a court in a criminal case, or found incompetent to stand trial, or not guilty by reason of lack of mental responsibility.

    States can report those individuals to the NICS database used by federally licensed firearms dealers to screen for prohibited gun buyers. As of Dec. 31, 2016, there were more than 4.6 million active records in the NICS database for people with “adjudicated mental health” issues, according to FBI data.

    When a customer applies to buy a gun from a federally licensed firearms dealer, the seller initiates the required background check by phone or online. NICS then runs the would-be gun buyer’s name and other identifying information against several nationally held databases to determine if the applicant is legally permitted to buy a gun. In addition to mental health records, those databases contain criminal records, court records (such as warrants and protection orders), as well as immigration and naturalization records if the applicant is not a US citizen.

    The dealer can complete the sale if there is no match for the applicant in the system. But if there is a match, the gun purchase can be delayed for up to 72 hours while examiners review the case and determine if the person is indeed prohibited from purchasing a weapon.

    The SSA’s final rule, which was issued in December 2016, was created to comply with the reporting requirements mandated by the NICS Improvement Amendment Act of 2007, which was signed into law in January 2008 by President George W. Bush. The law required federal agencies to report individuals prohibited from acquiring guns to the NICS.

    After the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, President Barack Obama issued a presidential memorandum advising the Justice Department to make sure that federal agencies were complying with the 2008 law by reporting relevant records to the national background check system.

  • GAO Study: Voters With Disabilities; Observations on Polling Place Accessibility and Related Federal Guidance

     GAO image re polling places + disability

    Observations on Polling Place Accessibility and Related Federal Guidance

    Why GAO Did This Study

    Federal law generally requires all polling places for federal elections to be accessible to all voters, and each polling place to have a system for casting ballots that is accessible for people with disabilities. GAO?s work during the 2000 and 2008 general elections showed mixed results on polling place accessibility. GAO was asked to examine voting access for people with disabilities during the 2016 general election.

    This report examines in-person voting before and on Election Day 2016. GAO examined (1) the extent to which selected polling places had features that might impede voting access; (2) actions states took to facilitate voting access; and (3) guidance DOJ provided on the extent to which federal accessibility requirements apply to early in-person voting. GAO examined features at a nongeneralizable sample of 178 polling places, identified by selecting 21 counties in 12 states and the District of Columbia (DC). Counties were selected for variation in population size, geographic location, and type of election administration. GAO did not assess legal compliance with federal or state laws. GAO also surveyed state election officials in 50 states and DC (with 98 percent responding); reviewed federal laws and guidance; and interviewed local, state, and federal officials.

    What GAO Found

    GAO examined a nongeneralizable sample of 178 polling places during early in-person voting and on Election Day 2016. At these polling places, GAO examined a number of features outside and inside the voting area. Outside the voting area, GAO was able to examine features at all 178 polling places and found that 60 percent (107) had one or more potential impediments. The most common were steep ramps located outside buildings, lack of signs indicating accessible paths, and poor parking or path surfaces (see figure).

    Of the 178 polling places, GAO was able to fully examine voting stations inside the voting area at 137. Of these 137 polling places, 65 percent (89) had a voting station with an accessible voting system that could impede the casting of a private and independent vote. For example, some voting stations were not set up to accommodate people using wheelchairs, which might have required someone else to help them vote. GAO was not able to fully examine voting stations at 41 polling places due to voting area restrictions.

    Most states that completed GAO?s survey reported taking actions during the 2016 general election to facilitate voting access for voters with disabilities, including having accessibility requirements, providing election worker training, and conducting oversight. For example, 44 states reported having accessibility standards for polling places, and 48 states reported conducting at least one oversight activity, such as analyzing accessibility complaints.

    The Department of Justice?s (DOJ) guidance does not clearly specify the extent to which certain federal accessibility requirements are applicable to early inperson voting, an increasingly common form of voting at a designated location before Election Day. In this context, GAO found some variation in the extent to which accessible voting systems are provided for early in-person voting. GAO found one county without accessible voting systems at five of its early in-person voting locations. Also, officials from four states said that these systems are not required by their state laws for in-person voting before Election Day. Given that voting has evolved since federal accessibility requirements were enacted, studying the implementation of these requirements in the context of early inperson voting could position DOJ to determine the extent to which any changes to its guidance are necessary

    What GAO Recommends

    GAO recommends that DOJ study the implementation of federal accessibility requirements in the context of early inperson voting and, as necessary, make changes to existing guidance. DOJ generally agreed with GAO?s recommendation. 

    Full Report

    http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-18-4?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery

  • Jealousy, The Green-Eyed Monster As Constant Companion

     Circe Individiosa

    by Julia Sneden

    Whenever I attend one of my granddaughter’s swimming meets, I am seized with intense nostalgia that borders on jealousy. No, correct that;  it is jealousy, although it is mitigated by pride and delight as I watch her stroke down the lane in her beautiful, even crawl. The sight triggers memories of how it feels to be young and strong, and reaching for the rewards that effort and discipline can bring. Believe me, I am happy for her.

    Circe Invidiosa  (“Circe, abounding in envy”) by John William Waterhouse; Image of Circe, a figure from Greek mythology, who appears in Homer’s Odyssey. This painting shows a scene not from the Odyssey, but from Ovid’s Metamorphoses. A jealous Circe throws a magic potion into the well, where her rival in love Scylla is going to bathe; Wikipedia

    But it would be hard not to envy her that joy because as she comes into her own, I am increasingly aware that my physical and mental powers are slowly dwindling despite my earnest efforts to hang onto them.

    I’m an active person, but my balance is beginning to fray around the edges, and the strength in my hands is nowhere near what it was just a couple of years ago. Neither is my mental agility. Focus and swift recall are both showing signs of wear from my accumulating years.

    No, I don’t think I am developing Alzheimer’s. I do realize that memory lapses are common to anyone my age, and I take comfort in the fact that while the neurons and synapses function more slowly, they do function. If I can’t instantly recall a fact or a name, I know that if I just stop trying, it will float up when it’s good and ready (sometimes at 2 a.m., sometimes in the midst of an unrelated conversation, sometimes days later).

    I don’t waste time worrying about the problem. When my memory glitches, I tell myself that I simply know too much, and have overloaded my mental circuits. After all, when my computer tries to handle too much, it, too, slows down. Unfortunately, I can’t just go out to the computer store and buy myself a new brain.

    Poet Dylan Thomas’s advice on dealing with the diminishments of aging is:

    ‘Do not go gently into the good night…

    Rage, rage against the dying of the light!’

    That’s a breathtaking bit of bravado, but I’m not sure many of us can muster the energy to follow his advice. I could rage, I guess, if I really worked at it, but somehow I don’t want to go out of this world expending a lot of effort on anger.

    It seems to me that a sense of humor serves better. It’s true that having a good laugh at yourself requires the exercise of hard-earned perspective, but it’s not a bad alternate response to the fact that life is a terminal condition.

  • Reprising Kissing a Frog, A Math Problem for the Princess and A Mathematicians’s Guide to Mating

    Editor’s Note:  We found this 2008 maths essay again when trying to find something unique for Halloween … we had purchased a witch doll kissing a frog*, if you must know. In fact, in a post centering on the Scout Report, we ran their recommendation of +Plus Magazine. 

    Kissing the frog: A mathematician’s guide to mating by John Billingham, a Professor of Theoretical Mechanics in the School of Mathematical Sciences at the University of Nottingham

    After introducing the original fairytale, Professor Billingham posits another way to play the selection game. The paragraphs and link that follow are from a 2008 +Plus Magazine:

    How attractive is my frog? Kissed Too Soon?The Frog Prince

    I’m told that when men meet women, they sometimes rate each other on a scale of 1 to 10. Of course, mathematicians are far too intelligent and sophisticated do this. We rate people on a scale of 0 to 1. In our original mathematical model, all we could do was compare one possible frog with another. The numbers didn’t mean anything in themselves; they just told the princess whether one frog was “better” than another. Let’s change the fairytale slightly so that the 100 frogs are now labelled with numbers drawn randomly from those that lie between 0 and 1, with the handsome prince having the highest number. What’s the princess’s best strategy now?

    The Frog Prince by Paul Meyerheim, 1889; illustration for the fairy tale The Frog Prince. Wikipedia

    Well, the princess now has much more information to use. There is a highest and a lowest number (0 and 1), and the frogs’ numbers are uniformly, but randomly, distributed between the two. If the first frog to hop out is numbered, for example, 0.99, then she knows it’s a top quality frog, and could well be worth a peck on the cheek. What if the first frog is numbered 0.8? Is that good enough to kiss? It turns out that the best strategy is, as anyone aged over 25 knows, to start with high standards, and then lower them as the frogs keep on coming. We’re meant to be doing some maths here, so by “standards” I mean that for each frog there is a number, called a decision number, below which the princess shouldn’t kiss it (here’s how to calculate the decision number). If the frog is numbered above the appropriate decision number, and is the best frog so far, she should kiss it. This strategy nets her the handsome prince a whopping 58% of the time. In fact, if the first frog is numbered 0.99, she shouldn’t kiss it, because the first decision number for 100 frogs is about 0.992. She’s more likely to find Mr. Right by holding out for a more attractive frog.

    The best-looking frog … but he doesn’t fancy me .. and I don’t know why not!

    There are lots of other things that we could add to our mathematical model to make it more realistic. For example, in real life, if you kiss the second best frog, you don’t have to stay in the enchanted forest. Unless you’re an incurable romantic who thinks that there’s just one perfect person out there for you, you can be very happy with frog number 2. Maybe you’re more interested in avoiding a very bad frog. What’s more important, making sure you bag frog number 1 or avoiding frogs 51 to 100? The strategy you should choose depends upon what you’re trying to achieve.

    Read the rest of Prof. Billingham’s math essay at the +Plus Magazine site

    *A catalog appeared at our house during a Halloween season in the past that might supply another frog kissing witch doll: Olive & Cocoa

  • No One Is Coming: Hospice Patients Abandoned At Death’s Door

    Patricia Martin

     
     October 26, 2017

    A Kaiser Health News story

    As her husband lay moaning in pain from the cancer riddling his body, Patricia Martin searched frantically through his medical bag, looking for a syringe.

    She had already called the hospice twice, demanding liquid methadone to ease the agony of Dr. Robert Martin, 66. A family practice physician known to everyone as “Dr. Bob,” he had served this small, remote community for more than 30 years.

    But the doctor in charge at Mat-Su Regional Home Health & Hospice wasn?t responding. Staff said he was on vacation, then that he was asleep. Martin had waited four days to get pain pills delivered, but her husband could no longer swallow them. Now, they said, she should just crush the drugs herself, mix them with water and squirt the mixture into his mouth. That’s why she needed the syringe.

    “I thought if I had hospice, I would get the support I needed. They basically said they would provide 24/7 support,” she said, shaking her head in disbelief, three years later. “It was a nightmare.”

    The Martins had entrusted the ailing doctor’s final days to one of the nation’s 4,000-plus hospice agencies, which pledge to be on call around-the-clock to tend to a dying person’s physical, emotional and spiritual needs.

    Yet the hospice care that people expect ? and sign up for ? sometimes disappears when they need it most. Families across the country, from Alaska to Appalachia, have called for help in times of crisis and been met with delays, no-shows and unanswered calls, a Kaiser Health News investigation shows.

    A KHN analysis of 20,000 government inspection records reveals that missed visits and neglect are common for patients dying at home. Families or caregivers, shocked and angered by substandard care, have filed over 3,200 complaints with state officials in the past five years.

    Those complaints led government inspectors to uncover problems in 759 hospices, with more than half cited for missing visits or other services they had promised to provide at the end of life, KHN found.

    The horrifying reports, which do not include victims’ names, describe a 31-year-old California woman whose boyfriend tried for 10 hours to reach hospice as she gurgled and turned blue, and a panicked caregiver in New York calling repeatedly for middle-of-the-night assistance from confused hospice workers unaware of who was on duty. In Michigan, a dementia patient moaned and thrashed at home in a broken hospital bed, enduring long waits for pain relief in the last 11 days of life, and prompting the patient?s caregiver to call nurses and ask, “What am I gonna do? No one is coming to help me. I was promised help at the end.”

    Only in rare cases were hospices punished for providing poor care, the investigation showed.

    Using death records and public records searches, KHN identified some victims of the worst abuse detailed in the complaints and interviewed surviving family members.

    I thought if I had hospice, I would get the support I needed. They basically said they would provide 24/7 support . . . It was a nightmare.

    Patricia Martin of Wasilla, Alaska, widow of hospice patient Dr. Bob Martin

    Contacted by KHN, Patricia Martin tearfully said she?d given up hope that anyone would take seriously her complaints about her husband’s care. She had enrolled him in hospice when the metastatic prostate cancer reached his brain, expecting the same kind of compassionate, timely attention he had given his own patients.

    But Bob Martin had the misfortune to require care during a long holiday weekend, when hospices are often too short-staffed to fulfill written commitments to families. It took six days and three more calls before he received the liquid methadone he needed. Hospice denied his wife’s requests for a catheter, and she and her son had to cut away his urine-soaked clothing and bedding, trying not to cause him additional pain. The supervising hospice doctor never responded. A nurse who was supposed to visit didn’t show up, saying she was called for jury duty.

    Bob Martin died just after midnight on Jan. 4, 2014. Six weeks later, his wife filed a complaint against Mat-Su Regional with the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services. An investigation concluded that the hospice failed to properly coordinate services, jeopardizing his end-of-life care. Hospice officials declined interview requests.

    “It was just sheer chaos,” Patricia Martin said. “It makes me wonder about other people in this situation. What happens to them?”

    Patricia Martin looks through old photographs of her husband on April 14. Bob Martin, a family practice physician, died in 2014. (Heidi de Marco/KHN)

    Ross Martin, Patricia Martin and Emily Martin with the family dog, Mabel, at their home in Wasilla, Alaska, in April. (Heidi de Marco/KHN)

    Hospice’s Holistic Promise

    Hospice is available through Medicare to critically ill patients expected to die within six months who agree to forgo further curative treatment. The care is focused on comfort instead of aggressive medical interventions that can lead to unpleasant, drawn-out hospital deaths.

    It?s a booming industry that served about 1.4 million Medicare patients in the U.S. in 2015, including over a third of Americans who died that year, according to latest industry and government figures.

    Although many people think of hospice as a site where people go to die, nearly half of hospice patients receive care at home, according to industry figures.

    The mission of hospice is to offer peaceful, holistic care and to leave patients and their loved ones in control at the end of life. Agencies receive nearly $16 billion a year in federal Medicare dollars to send nurses, social workers and aides to care for patients wherever they live. While the vast majority of hospice care is covered by Medicare, some is paid for by private insurance, Medicaid and the US Department of Veterans Affairs.

  • Ferida Wolff’s Backyard: Halloween and Spiders, Young Hungry Deer and More Deer

    Halloween and Spidersspider web and pumpkin

     
    Halloween is here again. Houses are decorated with witches, pumpkins, ghosts and goblins. And, of course, with spider webs. I coated our front bushes with white webs and put up wire webs on the garage doors. It’s fun to decorate for the holiday.
     
    But Mother Nature outdid all the webs in the neighborhood. A spider worked its way down from the roof of our garage and spun a magnificent web that made my attempts laughable. It anchored the bottom of the web on a bush and then sat in the middle waiting around for a meal to be caught. 
     
    Spider webs are well constructed. The spider has a plan. It mixes non-sticky threads with sticky ones in a symmetrical design. And it does it fairly quickly for such complexity. A spider might be small but don’t diminish its capabilities: it has spider smarts.
     
    The more I observe nature, the more I realize that everything has intelligence. Plants do. Insects do. Animals and birds are pretty darn smart. It may differ from how we think but it is functional for how to survive. If we diminish anything in nature we lessen our own understanding of life.
     
    So on this spooky holiday, when we say WOOOOO, let’s remember it is more than being scary, it is being observant.
     
    A look at web-making:
    Get to know spiders:

     

    More Deer

    More Deer 
    I saw another deer, well, three actually. This time they were healthy and strong unlike the poor deer that wandered into my backyard last time. They ambled about hardly paying any attention to the humans mesmerized by their presence. I wondered what they were finding to eat. Did they like the tiny Rose of Sharon bushes that were trying to get started at the foot of the maple tree? Were they munching on the wild strawberry plants that tend to spread wherever they can?
     
    They wandered through the hedges into one neighbor’s yard, then moved to another. Then they moved on, to where I don’t know. I think it was to the woods a couple of blocks away from the elementary school. But to get there, they would have to cross a busy road and several streets. Surely someone must see them on the way.  I try to be on the lookout for wandering deer but they always pop up as a surprise.
     
    Perhaps it’s time to put up a deer crossing sign next to the school crossing sign. I want to protect any being, human or otherwise. But deer overpopulation is becoming a problem. The New York Times reported  that *New York City’s Department of Parks and Recreation has a deer sterilization program in the works in Staten Island. Will that take care of the problem? It takes time and will the deer population continue to grow in the interim? Here are some things to think about in this regard, researched by Koryos: http://www.koryoswrites.com/nonfiction/white-tailed-deer-overpopulation-in-the-united-states/ 
     
    *”At high population levels, white-tailed deer can pose significant challenges to human health and safety through deer-vehicle collisions and associations with tick-borne illnesses, and have a detrimental impact on both forest biodiversity and tree regeneration. Deer have no natural predators on Staten Island. Thus, a handful of recently arrived deer (presumed to have swum from New Jersey) have over the past few years quickly multiplied in number, and a 2014 aerial survey counted the deer population at 763.

    “The City has developed an integrated, non-lethal, site-specific management plan that will allow experts to take immediate steps to reduce future impacts of an over-abundant deer population. The four-pronged plan includes:

    Sterilization Study: A three-year surgical sterilization study focused on male deer. Past studies of surgical sterilization have demonstrated a 10 to 30 percent decline in annual population. We propose focusing on males for this research project for several reasons.  First, the procedure is simpler to perform and less invasive for the animal. Second, there are typically far fewer males than females in suburban populations. Third, males can be operated on year-round providing a broader implementation window. This is particularly important in an area as large as Staten Island. Finally, the island constricts immigration of males that typically are more transient in the landscape, thus making this approach more likely to succeed than in a more contiguous landscape.

    Traffic Safety Measures to reduce deer-vehicle collisions including signage, education, and deer resistant plantings on roadways.

    Extensive Public Education focusing on living safely with deer in an urban environment, including driver education to reduce deer-vehicle collisions, public health education to reduce the incidence of tick bites and tick-borne illnesses, and environmental education to discourage feeding and encourage the planting of deer resistant plants.

    Natural Resource Protections include new fences around planted forest, tree guards on new trees, deer-resistant plantings and further protective measures.”

    Have any thoughts on the issue?
     
    Editor’s Note: We have a well-established dynasty of deer around our home in Berkeley and have tried the usual deterrents, including human hair, scarecrow water sprinklers and bars of soap.
     
    Lately, however, we’re employing a Predator Guard Solar-Powered deterrent: it has a fox-like-head silhouette that emits a red flashing light during the evening mounted on a post and night hours.  We move it every few weeks so the deer think there’s some actual movement to the ‘animal’; it seems to be working well as the flashing lights seem more effective than sprays (ewww!) that have to be renewed after any rain storm.
  • FAQs About the National Archives Records: Additional Documents: President John F. Kennedy’s Assassination Records

    The First Family at Mass in Palm Beach

     

     

     

     

     

    The Kennedy family departs a private chapel at the residence of Ambassador Joseph P. Kennedy, Sr., in Palm Beach, Florida, following Easter Sunday service. President John F. Kennedy holds Caroline Kennedy’s hand; First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy carries John F. Kennedy, Jr.; White House Secret Service agent, Bill Greer, stands at right (behind. White House Photographs, JFK Library car) National Archives and Records Administration. 22 April 1962

    JFK Assassination Records – 2017 Additional Documents Release: October 26, 2017:  2,891 documents

    The National Archives is releasing documents previously withheld in accordance with the JFK Assassination Records Collection Act.  The vast majority of the Collection (88%) has been open in full and released to the public since the late 1990s. The records at issue are documents previously identified as assassination records, but withheld in full or withheld in part. Learn more

    These releases include FBI, CIA, and other agency documents (both formerly withheld in part and formerly withheld in full) identified by the Assassination Records Review Board as assassination records. The releases to date are as follows:

    Accessing the Release Files

    To view or download a released file, follow the link in the “File Number” column. You can also download the full spreadsheet with metadata about all the documents. The files are sorted by NARA Release Date, with the most recent files appearing first. The previous withholding status (i.e., formerly withheld in part or formerly withheld in full) is identified in the “Formerly Withheld Status” column.


    The President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection

    John F. Kennedy was killed on November 22, 1963. Almost 30 years later, Congress enacted the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. The Act mandated that all assassination-related material be housed in a single collection in the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).   The resulting Collection consists of more than 5 million pages of assassination-related records, photographs, motion pictures, sound recordings and artifacts (approximately 2,000 cubic feet of records). Most of the records are open for research.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    En Español 


    I’ve heard that some of the records are sealed? Why? When will they be opened to the public for examination for my research?

    It is a common misconception that the records relating to the assassination of President Kennedy are in some way sealed. In fact, the records are largely open and available to the research community here at the National Archives at College Park in the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Record Collection.

    Congress created the Kennedy Collection when it passed the Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. This statute directed all Federal agencies to transmit to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) all records relating to the assassination in their custody. The Kennedy Act also created a temporary agency, the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB), to ensure that the agencies complied with the Act.

  • Klimt & Rodin: An Artist Encounter Breaking the Reigning Aesthetic Boundaries of the Time

     

    Klimt














    Gustav Klimt, The Virgin,1913, Oil on canvas, 190 x 200 cm, National Gallery Prague

    The Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco are presenting Klimt & Rodin: An Artistic Encounter at the Legion of Honor until January 28, 2018 on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the deaths of Auguste Rodin in November 1917 and Gustav Klimt in February 1918. The exhibition will celebrate the legacies of these two pioneers, who each broke the reigning aesthetic boundaries of the time to find new vocabularies and create powerful agendas for modern painting and sculpture. Arranged in dialogue with the Legion of Honor’s acclaimed collection of Rodin works, Klimt and Rodin will provide an incredibly rare opportunity for American audiences to see a range of signature works by the Austrian master Klimt, many of which will travel to the U.S. for the first time.

    “This will be an exceptional and breathtaking opportunity to experience the art of Gustav Klimt in San Francisco,” says Max Hollein, Director and CEO of the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco. “And as a native Viennese, I am especially proud that we are able to present the beloved works by Klimt at the Legion of Honor. With our important Rodin collection, we are perfectly situated to engage Klimt’s masterpieces in dialogue with Rodin’s oeuvre.”

    This first major Klimt exhibition on the West Coast surveys the span of the artist’s practice. Among the 33 works by Klimt exhibited are iconic paintings, such as Nuda Veritas (1899), Klimt”s response to the conservative views of the art establishment, on loan from the Österreichisches Theatermuseum; Upper Austrian Farmhouse (1911), in his landscape style, loaned by the Belvedere in Vienna;  Portrait of Ria Munk III (1917) from the Lewis Collection; and The Virgin (1913), loaned from the National Gallery in Prague, in which Klimt’s use of color is on full display.

    Sonja by Klimt

    Gustave Klimt, Portrait of Sonja Knips, 1898; oil on canvas. Osterreichische Galerie Belvedere, Vienna, Austria

    “This exhibition … provides an insight into leading art developments in Europe at the turn of the century through the lens of two of its most important artists,” adds curator Tobias G. Natter. “It marks the very first time a survey of Klimt’s works with some of his most outstanding masterpieces will be exhibited in California.”